Developing Story!

Pro-vax doctor Dr. Shivam trolls and discredit 20 year practising clinician and calls him an loony antivaxxer!

Then gets threated with legal action...

Now he is begging to "let it go..." 😂

Please update us on the court case, Dr. Manigreeva and good luck!
@manigreeva

Should Dr. Manigreeva "let it go"???
Maybe enough is enough!

@DocAhmadMalik @CartlandDavid Oof! Calling a 20 year old practicing clinician a data entry clerk... yikes!

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥
Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury.

This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely.

I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience.

Here's the first hour of the testimony.

----------------------------------
My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy.

In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil.

In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity.

...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves.

And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant.

Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine.

In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice.

One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine.

The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications.
I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case.

A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo.

These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine.

On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment.

Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests.

And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public.

I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine.

The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest.

Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open.

A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines.

Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years.

Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated.

The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry.

At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues.

Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine.

For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated.

Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption.

To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC".

This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid.

One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard.

The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website.

The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800.

Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800.

In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place.

In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines.

From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine.

This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry.

For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated.

Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved.

I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines.

I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health.

Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture.

Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits.

I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is.

Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.

I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence.

The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step.
----------------------
@DrAseemMalhotra
H/T: @TiinaKeskimki WRITEUP AND EMAILABLE FORMAT
aussie17.com/p/dr-aseem-mal…

🚨🚨🚨 HAPPENING TODAY IN JAPAN
Thousands attend public demonstration against WHO and New World Order across multiple locations in Japan!

Pre-demonstration speeches:
Prof: Masayasu Inoue: ...there indeed exists something very evil. It's often dismissed with a single phrase as a 'conspiracy', but in reality, conspiracies have been part of our genetics and culture since the Age of Exploration, continuing to this day. I came to realize this. In that sense, my message for today is about vaccines that use our genetics to make our bodies produce pathogens or proteins, even if they're disguised as vaccines, for example, next could be influenza. And now, there's panic over sugar and various other things, but the strategy to use messenger types for everything has become the basic strategy of American global pharmaceutical companies. To everyone here, among friends and acquaintances, introducing genetic vaccines into the body should not be done, regardless of the type. Take this as the key message home; by doing so, I hope you can protect your children and grandchildren. In this sense, half a century later, what was then WHO, has over these last four years been guiding us through some absurd directions. Upon investigation, over 85% of WHO's budget turns out to be funded by pharmaceutical companies and stakeholders like Bill Gates Foundation, indicating that it's being directed towards their interests. This means our health is being used as a weapon, and now we're in the midst of a third world war fought with information, questioning whether responsible adults are aware and able to protect themselves accordingly.
----------------------------
Let's stop the third atomic bomb with our hands, in the hands of the Japanese people. Shall we not? This national movement actually has four objectives. First, a pledge and declaration. Here, we vow to protect our children, to protect Japan. We stand against WHO, global totalitarianism, pandemic treaties, submarine IHR, genetic vaccines, plandemic, control of information, and declare to eliminate all these. Figures such as Tedros, Gates, Schwab, Biden, representatives of the New World Order. One of their primary agents, Fumio Kishida. And Kamikawa, further, Japan's Fauci, Takemi, Takemi, Takemi. The term New World Order came up earlier, but though it has 'New' in its name, it's actually an old order. It's an order that should collapse. Message from Japan to the World
aussie17.com/p/a-message-fr…

🚨🚨🚨🚨
A Developing Scandal in Germany!

Germany's Federal Ministry of Health, BMG (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit), is walking on thin ice as 2000+ pages of documents from the RKI (Robert Koch Institute, which is the German federal government agency and research institute responsible for disease control and prevention), were released a few weeks ago.

The RKI documents showed that the so-called pandemic was generally considered low risk to the population and severe lockdowns were not recommended, yet it is alleged that bureaucrats followed orders FROM OUTSIDE to lockdown and cripple the economy.

WHO is "giving orders" to countries???

Watch the uncomfortable exchange between investigative journalist Florian Warweg (@FWarweg) and the BMG here!

Transcript--------------------------
Florian Warweg: The question is directed to the BMG. From the public records of the RKI protocols, which were also a topic on March 25th, it is revealed that the RKI internally assessed the risk to the population as still low on February 24, 2020. This leads me to question the basis on which the BMG Deputy Director for Health Security,Heiko Rottmann-Großner on that very same day at the BMG meeting, recommended to several state secretaries of the Interior Ministry that the economy must now be shut down and preparations need to be made for lockdowns of an undetermined duration. As I am interested, as said, in the basis for that particular in the basis of that recommendation.

BMG: Well, as you know, these are internal RKI protocols and as the BMG, we generally do not comment on them as the BMG.

Florian Warweg: Okay, my question wasn't about the RKI protocols, but about the statements made by the BMG Under-Secretary. But then I'll try with a different question. It has also been emphasized repeatedly, both by your side and from the ministry's side, that the tightening of the risk assessment from March 17, 2020, was based on the lockdown decision within the RKI following a scientific debate was based on the lockdown decision within the RKI following a scientific debate and not, as partly reported by the media, due to political orders from the outside. Against this backdrop, I am again curious why, according to the RKI -lawyers, there are no documents or protocols to substantiate this debate, so to speak. I would also be interested to know how the BMG explains that the agency directly under it has no protocols about this scientific debate on this scientific debate concerning risk tightening.

BMG: I can say it again, these are internal RKI protocols and everything has been said on this topic, no matter how often you ask.
------------------------------------- SOURCE TWEET

https://x.com/SHomburg/status/1777562056662614374

🤯🤯
Wow! 3rd footballer collapsed on live TV this week!

30 year old Egyptian National Footballer Ahmed Refaat collapsed on the pitch during a match between his club Modern Future FC and Ittihad.

The Egyptian international suffered a cardiac arrest and was taken to hospital. After an hour, his heart started beating again.

Club's medical supervisors claimed doctors hadn’t seen something like it before. 👇

https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1769555754057609534

Oh my god, second footballer collapsed on live TV in two days.

Estudiantes’ Javier Altamirano suffers a seizure during match against Boca just a day ago, another collapse

https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1769515307889287522

🚨🚨🚨
Open Letter from Mike Yeadon to Metropolitan Police

Please share!

==========================
From: MikeYeadon
Date: On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 22:56
Subject: Fw: Dr Mike Yeadon: Introductory statement about serious crimes per Mark Sexton communication
To: Ben.Bates@met.police.uk Cc: Mark Sexton

Dear Ben Bates,

I have been asked by former policeman, Mark Sexton (copied) to introduce myself to you & to indicate the fields in which I have unequivocal evidence of criminal activity.

Let me begin my outlining my credentials to have realised that the areas I will outline were incorrect in the first place.

My name is Dr Mike Yeadon. I am the most senior, former “big pharma” & biotech research executive speaking out about several serious crimes in relation to what I call the “Covid era”.

My original training was in Biochemistry & Toxicology, in which I was awarded the strongest first class joint honours degree that the School of Biomedical Sciences had ever awarded at the time (1985, University of Surrey).

Part of my undergraduate training involved research placements at the Chemical Defence Establishment, Porton Down, Wiltshire, where I was a small cog in the long term development of injected antidotes for nerve gas poisoning to protect British troops. I also worked at the then Central Laboratory of the Forensic Sciences Service, Aldermaston, Berkshire, adjacent to the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment. While with the Forensic Science Service, I received training on several precision analytical methods including mass spectrometry, then a highly technically complex method.
As far as I recall, I had security clearance for both establishments. Porton Down, then as now, is a top security facility with an international reputation.

My PhD, in the field of Pharmacology was “On the effect of opiates on respiratory function” (1988) and this was sponsored by the MOD.

After securing my PhD, which gave me a sound training in several additional subdisciplines of biology, chemistry & drug metabolism, I joined the pharmaceutical industry.

I spent 24years with “big pharma”, starting at Wellcome Research Laboratories, where I briefly worked alongside a Dr Patrick Vallance (who became Chief Scientific Advisor to the British
Government).
For the longest period, I was in charge of Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics. I left Pfizer in 2011, having reached the level of Vice President, because the company had decided to exit their large R&D base in Kent. The parting was cordial. Before leaving, I sought to find new homes for the portfolio of exploratory medicines I had helped create & was gratified that Mylan U.K. Ltd, the world’s second largest generics company, acquired much of my former portfolio soon after I had left.

I later founded & lead as CEO a highly successful biotechnology company, Ziarco Pharma Ltd. Pfizer and four other venture capital firms were investors in my company, which was acquired by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, in 2017.

📷My accomplishments are considered by some to have been unusual. So much so that a former Pfizer board member & previously worldwide head of R&D, Dr John LaMattina, wrote up my last venture in Forbes, a leading business magazine (February 2017).


In summary, I have had a very strong training in multiple disciplines and over 30 years leadership experience in the field of inventing and testing new medicines for respiratory illnesses. I have an excellent analytical background and I can claim to be at least the equal of anyone advising the government in science.

I have no history of “conspiracy theory” or political campaigns or protests. I don’t believe I made a single public comment on anything prior to 2020.

My accomplishments in applied biomedical sciences qualify me to be taken seriously.

I ask that the evidence I marshall is evaluated thoroughly. I am confident in my assessments, which have been tested by dozens of others, internationally well known scientists and doctors.
I have filed numerous legal statements as affidavits used in court proceedings in several countries.

I’m going to introduce just two topics at this point. To cover everything would be simply too overwhelming to read, let alone absorb & understand at a single sitting. I’m simply going to make statements. I’m not going to attempt to prove them in this short communication. Rest assured I have done so however, on dozens of occasions. I’ve given upwards of 250 full length interviews.

I must warn the reader that even this deliberately limited information is going to be shocking, if

you hadn’t already realised that something without precedent in the world was going on. Please also note that ordinary searching on the internet, often colloquially as “googling”, is not going to find many of the sources upon which I have drawn. The major search engines have been manipulated such that the results exclude material troubling to the authorities.
The two areas are:
1. The claimed pandemic.

2. The injections, purporting to be vaccines.
The main claims are stark.
1. Put simply, there has been no pandemic. There was the normal range of illnesses in the early part of 2020 as in any other year. What was different about 2020 was that all governments, lead by the WHO, engaged in coordinated lying to their citizens. This continues to this day. Everyone was told there was a pandemic was coming. The illusion was created by deliberate misuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person “had covid”. There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease. A positive test was called “a case”. Anybody dying within a few weeks of a positive test was declared “a covid death”. All that was needed was to roll out such tests rapidly in early 2020 & the carefully planned result, an apparent “pandemic” was created. Government & media lies was initially all it took to maintain the illusion.

Crucially, the epidemiological evidence shows that there was no additional illness or deaths compared with the same period in any other year. Numerous scientific papers and authors will present their evidence on this point, including university professors qualified in epidemiology.
The WHO played their part in the crime, by declaring a “public health emergency of international concern”, or a “pandemic”. Immediately after WHO’s fraudulent declaration, changes in medical procedures were imposed everywhere. These changes caused the deaths that were held up to the citizens as proof that we were in a pandemic. We have a long list of witnesses to these changes being inappropriate and often fatal. Notice my PhD was on the effects of opiates, like morphine, on respiration. I knew that what was being prescribed was definitely inappropriate.
So, no pandemic. Only the deliberate illusion of one. This was accompanied by changes in medical practise that would predictably result in large numbers of deaths in hospitals, care homes and the community. No one will fail to appreciate the severity of the charges here.

I cannot be sure the motivation for this deception was. But the effects of it has been to severely damage the economies of scores of countries, with financial transfers counted in trillions of pounds, from the poorest & the taxpayers to the wealthiest elites. Civil society has also been severely disrupted and has never been allowed to begin to heal.
Other, less speculative motivations became apparent as 2020 wore on & this brings us to my

second, shocking charge.

2. The materials that are being called “covid1U vaccines” are obviously not vaccines. Note, there has been no pandemic.
My entire career has been in the field of designing and testing new arrangements of atoms to create what we hope will be new potential medicines. In addition to bringing about desired changes in the body, the main concern is to avoid unwanted effects, in other words, toxicity or harms.
My training in mechanistic toxicology was repeatedly useful in helping teams foresee, avoid or understand such problems.

So I understand deeply how to design molecules and also how to interrogate them for their prospects to bring about desired effects and crucially to discern risks of harms. I don’t think it’s too great a claim to say that there isn’t anyone better qualified than I am to do this in relation to these novel treatments.

I’m going to go directly to the charges.

These injections have been carefully designed to intentionally cause toxicity in those injected with them.

I can detect at least three, separate features of these injections which would be expected to injure, to kill or to reduce fertility in survivors. These are not mistakes. Each are so obviously deliberate to anyone who has a history of involvement in rational drug design for new medicines.

At least two features are common to every injection purporting to be a “covid vaccine”. First, the mRNA nature of the major products. Second, the lipid nanoparticle nature of the formulations in which they are encapsulated.

The mRNA is genetic code for a chosen protein. Regardless of what the protein is, once the human body is caused to express it, it will be recognized as foreign and attacked by their own immune system. Depending on details we cannot know, just by looking at the glass vials, some people will be injured as a result of this lethal autoimmune attack. Others will be killed, the time taken to die & their suffering before they die will vary. It’ll look like the normal range of illnesses. There will simply be more of them.

Because of the lipid nano particle formulation, some of the injected materials will accumulate in the ovaries (possibly also the testicles). This homing property in reproductive tissue has been known about for more than a decade. The effect will be a lowering of fertility affecting every stage of reproduction.

I can bring detailed rationales for each of these claims as well as several others.

I also have an usual piece of evidence, given the crimes I claim have been committed. I had worked out part of this assault before any purported vaccine had received its fraudulent authorization.
Having done so, with another author, I wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Authority in early December 2020, which is attached below. In it, we warn of the harms which we anticipated. It has been more than upsetting to watch them come true, the last taking a year, the adverse effects on fertility.
All-causes mortality is elevated almost everywhere in the world that these products have been widely used and live births sharply reduced.


I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you in considerable detail about these and other charges.
I will publish this letter on my Telegram site, where 20,000 followers will no doubt be interested to learn what the Met Police does with this information. If I may be so bold, I would invite you to think about how you plan to describe your next actions to your family and, if you have them, your children and grandchildren.
With best wishes and thank you for your attention.

Dr Mike Yeadon
------------------- LINK 1 forbes.com/sites/johnlama…

I don’t have Truth Social - Did this really come from Donald Trump??

“The Vaccines that saved us from COVID are now being used to beat Cancer.”
9 Months approval time vs 12 years that it would have taken you.”

Would love to see the comments !

ht: @SaiKate108 @SaiKate108

😱😱🚨🚨🚨
Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy.

Highlights
All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene.

The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on?
.....
Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there?
....
There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go.
...
This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering.
....
they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination.
.....
52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections.
....
They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious.
....
And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report. Full subtitled clip, writeup and emailable format here

aussie17.com/p/popular-yout…

🚨🚨🚨
Bombshell Press Joint Statement from 3 eminent Thai doctors!

---------------
A highly regarded neurologist-scientist, Prof Dr Thiravat Hemachudha, director of the Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre at Chulalongkorn University, among other accomplishments establishing a World Health Organization research unit at a major Thai hospital, along with Panthep Puapongphan, dean of Rangsit University’s College of Oriental Medicine, and a psychiatrist on the Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine Dr. Atapol Sughondhabirom issued an ominous joint statement—a call to action to healthcare professionals.

Points Joint Statement
1. Excess deaths are occurring not only due to long COVID but also due to the COVID-19 vaccines

2. COVID-19 symptoms lasting over three months equals long COVID, with both cardiac and pulmonary symptoms. But many other symptoms are possible: Brain, nervous and muscular system. Also, inflammatory dynamics across skin, tendons, fascia, muscles joints as well as are possible, plus outbreaks of new or dormant viruses/disease. These outbreaks can include shingles but also herpes, even cancer.

3. A movement to conceal critical health data/facts associated with the COVID-19 vaccines and those affected, including mortality, has led to underreporting of these affected by the vaccines. This includes the well-known blocking of such information on social media as well as other applications involving access to information.  Consequently, the majority of Thai society for example are left in the dark about such matters. Their condition may be vaccine related but they will not know thus making any true quest for care impossible

4. A study conducted by the Emerging Disease Health Science Center Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn Hospital In collaboration with the Department of Internal Medicine and the Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University interpret the data based on follow-up of people affected by both COVID-19 disease and vaccination. In nearly 100 people vaccinated in Thailand over a year, inflammation and protein levels were found to show signs of dementia. Both asymptomatic and already having symptoms. The researchers anticipate high risk of population problems associated with these findings.

5. A study from the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Published a report in the journal Nature Scientific Report on January 15, 2023, it discussed the issue of vaccination after the third dose that may cause T-Cell immunity to become exhausted. This means that over-vaccination may cause the body to have a weakened immune system.

6. Because persons with ongoing conditions from either long COVID or the vaccines cannot know at this time what is the underlying cause (due to the factors mentioned above including concealment, the collaborating Thai universities are establishing a research network to both collect data from the public, analyze and report on findings in a bid to improve the health of the Thai people.

7. The network established above will expand investigation into both long COVID and treating long Vax with both modern medicine and alternatives to compliment known COVID-19 regimen; this means that  the new research network again formed by College of Oriental Medicine Rangsit University and the Emerging Disease Health Science Center-- Chulalongkorn University will work to collect remedies and treatment methods, conduct research and disseminate them to the public with findings. They are open and will include supplements, herbs and traditional Thai and Chinese medicine.
----------------------------------- SOURCE
trialsitenews.com/a/thai-medical…

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
"UNPRECEDENTED SIDE EFFECTS"

Press Conference from Japan's "Vaccine Issues Study Group", January 11, 2024.

---Highlights---
Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima from Kyoto University:
A systematic review of the literature has revealed some surprising facts. Thousands of papers have reported side effects after vaccination, which affect every organ without exception. Ranging from ophthalmology to general medicine to psychiatry.
These documents have been preliminarily investigated by a group of volunteer physicians. They have looked into how many cases have been reported by Japanese academic societies. This kind of reporting on drug side effects or the like is unprecedented.

For example, the age-adjusted mortality rate for leukemia has increased. And there are significant findings for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and so on.
We will share the relevant information with everyone as we advise and request the government on how to proceed.

Regarding medical censorship with the vaccines:
Japanese doctors are trying hard, but they face various obstructions. There's this negative sentiment of 'Why report something like vaccine damage?' There are interferences. Such actions themselves hinder academic freedom, and in some academic departments, censorship is taking place.
Such as in conference presentations and paper publications. This is happening globally.
Some journals are effectively practicing censorship.

Regarding Brain related adverse events :
mental disorders, psychiatric symptoms, depression, mania, anxiety...etc
About the spike protein sequence, within the genes, you know, he(Luc Montagnier) was warning that if there's a prion-like sequence, it could be very dangerous.
Many scientists were warning. I too said it could be hazardous because of the possibility of prions. I discussed it with prion experts.

Professor Yasufumi Murakami from Tokyo University of Science:
Regarding adverse effects of the vaccines: One thing I want to say initially is that it is clear how the adverse effects occur, which is still holding many victims today. I believe it should be stopped immediately.
The mechanism by which adverse effects occur is well understood; the spike is toxic. It's very clear what happens when you administer a toxic gene to a human.
Another point is that the Lipidnanoparticles also induce very intense reactions, so this is also toxic.
The major problem is, we are injecting two toxic substances into people, one of which being that human cells are producing spike proteins. Since the immune system will attack this, this causes very violent genetics reactions to emerge.
There are cases that occur within one or two weeks after injection, but there are also many cases that appear after one or two years.

Regarding IgG4 antibody:
Usually with vaccines, if an IgG4 antibody is induced, it is considered a failure, however, with the current messenger-type vaccines, a significant amount of IgG4 is being induced. When this happens, it plays tricks on various immune functions. Therefore, we want to thoroughly investigate what ratio of Japanese people are inducing this, and we aim to carefully examine what level of IgG4 that reacts with the spike protein is present in each individual.

Regarding failed vaccines:
Vaccines that have failed are still being administered, and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare recognizes these failed vaccines. So I would like them to stop immediately, and even though I speak out in various places, they don't stop at all, so we will clearly present evidence and publish it as articles one by one.

Professor Masayasu Inoue who is Emeritus Professor at Osaka City University School of Medicine:
So, we are working with Dr. Fukushima to create this database, and so far, about 201 types of diseases and 3,071 papers on side effects have been reported. It is unprecedented in human history for a single vaccine to have this much literature out on it.
With this, we plan to present it to the nation and the Japanese government in the form of solid science that no one can dispute.
...you will find diseases of the heart, kidney, thyroid, diabetes, liver, skin, eyes, blood, nerves, systemic diseases, brain, lungs, diseases across all medical fields have been reported, and as Professor Fukushima stated,
The characteristic of the side effects of this vaccine is
As for the data, when diseases such as those of the heart, kidney, endocrine, and liver are taken simultaneously with the range in which they occur, it turns out that a tremendous number of papers are reported over many pages.
-------------------------------------------

H/T:@JINKOUZOUKA_jp @midfado_22 Write up & Full subtitled press conference here
aussie17.com/p/japan-vaccin…

🚨🚨🚨
Whoops!

Austrian TV station ServusTV "Talk im Hanger-7" talks about DNA plasmid contamination. (Dec 14 2023)

Pro government medical journalist looked uncomfortable during the segment.

"...before you If you ever say that you are calling on people to get vaccinated again, you should think carefully look at what you have learned in the last few years. And you learned, for example, back in February, this year it was published for the first time that the vaccine was contaminated is, namely with plasmid DNA.

And that's not false information, but these are facts. There are independent laboratories have found plasmid residues in a much higher concentration than that specification provides.

And you also have to say, you also have to question things, is that true? this specification, these famous 10 nanograms per dose, because it involves naked DNA. Here The DNA is just like the messenger RNA, it is packaged in the lipid nanoparticle, With that it also goes into the cell. And that's not even said. And I want that too because of my biotechnical experience as well as being an analyst, and I worked very, very closely also with the development, and the production, question whether this is actually the right one limit is.

And the authorities are silent about it. It hasn't been tested either. Yes, that's the next thing one has to tell people.They sent the test certificate further. It was at best paper control. And the control labs have barely performed any analyses. Yes, they did four parameters, including clarity, color, content, but they didn't test for all the important things regarding contamination.

And we've known that since February. There are now reports again, also from Germany, from Tuesday. And this is not being covered by mainstream media media. And there is where it needs to be reported, Before anyone thinks about further vaccination recommendations.

So the famous PlasmidGate, as it is also called, yes, if you've heard of it. And that's not any, not just any idea that someone has, but this is real data from laboratories, repeatedly shown that we are there have a huge problem. And that was in the MDF the day before yesterday. And the authorities are silent. And this is a scandal, in my opinion.
-------- SOURCE servustv.com/aktuelles/v/aa…

🚨🚨🚨🚨
For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine!

---------Transcript-----------

We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated.

"With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion."

Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells.

Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König.

This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this.

In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new.

Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous?

Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus?

That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern.

Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona.

However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate?

The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König.

"I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it."

The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine.

Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response.

So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study.

The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex.

But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA.

Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA.

However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report.
-----------------------------------

H/T: @Aquarius3_0 SOURCE
mdr.de/video/mdr-vide…

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Obstetrician-gynecologist Dr Kimberly Biss shares her observation on miscarriages.

From 4% on average to a high of 30% after vaccinations!

----------------------------------------------------
My name is Kimberly Biss, and I am an obstetrician-gynecologist practicing here in the state of Florida. We're going to discuss pregnancy and the COVID shots. How do I know about the pregnancy? Before we dive into this discussion, I want to outline my qualifications and experience for our viewers. I have no research publications in my name; however, I have been practicing for over 25 years. Including my residency training, I've cared for about 8,000 pregnant women. There are certain trends I am currently observing that I have not seen before, and they began when the COVID injections were introduced.

In November of 2021, a non-clinical staff member approached me, mentioning, "Dr. Biss, do you realize we've had eight miscarriages this month?" In my practice, which typically sees 20 to 25 deliveries a month, eight miscarriages is an abnormally high number. This prompted me to start tracking the data loosely. Approximately a year ago, I reviewed the data from January 2020 through to November 2022. I took note of not only the miscarriages within our practice but also the number of new pregnant mothers registering with us. What I found was a doubling of miscarriage rates year over year, and the number of new obstetric patients was decreasing annually. This could indicate early pregnancy losses or an increase in infertility, which seems to correspond with the timing of the injections being administered.

To provide you with specifics, the miscarriage rate at my practice in January 2020 was 4%. Obstetric textbooks often state that the normal miscarriage rate is around 13% to 15%, a figure I've never clinically witnessed. More recent literature, about four years old, suggests that the normal rate in the first trimester is approximately 5% to 6%. Those numbers are a bit higher than what I usually experience. Yet, my documentation shows that the average month-to-month miscarriage rate in 2020 was 4%. It jumped to 7-8% in 2021 and then increased further to an average of 15% per month in 2022. In December of 2022, it reached about 27%, and in January and February of this year, it climbed to 30%. It didn't normalize back to 4% until June of this year.

It's particularly concerning that the majority of these patients received their injections in 2021 and early 2022, with very few having more than three shots. This suggests that we're seeing persistent effects, despite the passage of time since the vaccinations were administered.

Regarding the timing of the miscarriages: they are predominantly occurring in the first trimester, around six to ten weeks. Most of these women had received the COVID shots at some point, either during or before their pregnancy. It's challenging to track the exact timing of inoculation for those I saw in 2022 and this year, as their vaccinations would've taken place back in 2021. Yet, there seems to be a continuation of factors that correlate with an increased likelihood of miscarriage.

I can share that 60-65% of my obstetric patients have been vaccinated, mainly with Pfizer, around a 70% to 30% split with Moderna. I haven't precisely matched the vaccination brand with every patient I've tracked because, regrettably, I'm the only one in my practice who systematically asks each of my gynecology patients whether they've received any injections, which type, and if they've had COVID. This has become a part of medical history, whether we like it or not. If we don't have that data in their charts when they experience a pregnancy loss, it becomes difficult to gather that information without making them feel responsible for the loss of their baby, which is something we want to avoid.
------------------------------------------ Emailable format
aussie17.com/p/florida-ob-g…

🚨🚨🚨🚨
Whoops! Swiss Federal Office caught manipulating Health Survey but Private Health Insurance data shows a staggering increase of population receiving cancer drugs!

"If you do the comparison, the one that wanted to be made in the health survey, calculate the increase from 2017 to 2022, then the value increased by 94%. So there were 94% more recipients of cancer drugs."

Professor Dr Konstantin Beck from University of Lucerne raises alarm in his recent presentation.

------------------------------------------------------
Hello everyone, my name is Konstantin Beck, I am a health economist at the University of Lucerne. We are asking the question, how healthy was Switzerland in the year 2022?

The reason for this is because in November '23, some publications, official releases appeared that have been partially retracted, which were very differing in their statements and the confusion on this point is somewhat significant at the moment. So, it's about sorting out these different statements. To the fact-checkers online, all statements made here are actually just those of the Federal Office of Public Health, and later of the Helsana insurance, the own calculations are kept within narrow limits. And if you are interested in this type of video, please subscribe and activate the bell so that you are informed when there is a new video as YouTube's algorithms sometimes do not make these videos easily findable. Let's start with the Health Surveys 2022.

This is conducted every five years by the Federal Office of Statistics. It receives high attention and is the basis for many scientific studies. And to this, the Federal Office states in its press release on November 3rd, when the health surveys were published, In the year 2022, 85%, so the vast majority of the Swiss population, felt healthy and 83% described themselves as happy. However, more than one-third of Swiss people live with a permanent health problem. However, these health problems cannot have been that great, because at least half of this third describes themselves as happy. The only negative that emerges here is the mental strain, which has increased compared to 2017 and especially in the younger age groups of 15-24-year-olds and there particularly among young women. Then there are a few details on smoking and alcohol consumption. And then, as I said, these are important results of the Swiss Health Surveys 2022 of the Federal Office for Statistics. So, even after the corona pandemic, the Swiss population is predominantly in good health according to their own assessment. This would actually say it all and solve the problem.

Now, the surprising thing is that at the same time, in the database of the Federal Office, a statistic with detailed information on the health survey could be found.

This was published under the abbreviation given here, and I believe I queried it on November 4th. And there you find answers to the question, have you ever had one of the following three diseases or health problems in your life? The questions were about heart attack, stroke, and cancer. And I will display it right away. What comes next has already been retracted by the Federal Office. But originally it stated that in 2017, approximately 33,000 reports of ever having a heart attack, nearly 28,000 a stroke, and about 117,000 cancer. And when you look at the figures for 2022, it increases to 170,000, 124,000, almost 461,000. So it rises by a factor of 4 to 5. It's a dramatic increase. However, I have corrected that. I calculated how much is due to age. We have immigration as well. Clearly, we have more cancer cases if more people live in Switzerland. But this gives corrections in the range of 2,000 to 9,000 cases.

So according to this statistic, we would have a third of a million more cancer cases in Switzerland, than one would expect based on age, sex, and immigration. And quite honestly, if this were the case, and I first believed these data too, they are from the Federal Office, then our cancer care and our cardiac infrastructure would probably be at their limits, if not collapsed. So at the latest by November 14th, at that time I realized this, you could no longer call up these numbers. The Federal Statistical Office erased the data for 2017 with the note that the health surveys of 2017 and 2022 are not comparable. No more information was provided. One had to inquire back. So if you have such a severe error, then it would perhaps be better or desirable that the error would be communicated better. Upon inquiry, it was then found out that in 2017 the question was, did you have any of the following diseases last year? And in 2022 the question was, have you ever had any of the following diseases or health problems in your life? Of course, that's a huge difference. Many people who didn't have a problem last year may have had the problem over the last few years. So understandable that then the second number will be larger than the first and also understandable that they are no longer comparable.

Not quite comprehensible, why you would change this question and thereby torpedo the comparability. Another argument, I won't go into it in so much detail now, is that the significance in many sub-evaluations was not given and they therefore wanted a larger sample, more 'yes' answers. Those are technically convincing arguments. But when you know that these are very sensitive questions because the vaccine critics expect that the negative impact of the vaccination could be shown and then just these data are first published to the institution and then retracted, it does not contribute to the trust in the Federal Office, unfortunately. Well, there remain open questions. Why was the obviously wrong comparison published? How did it even come about that the office, even though the difference is known, why did the office refrain from a detailed error communication, as I have already said? But why also does the press release of the Federal Office contrast so greatly with the development of chronic diseases? So there isn't even a mention that there was an increase here and what one doesn't know at all is, what is the actual situation concerning the increase or decrease of cancer diseases?

And fortunately, besides the office, there are also private providers. There's the drug reporter Helsana, which was published on November 30th and which specifies for each year the number of persons who, projected onto Switzerland, have taken cancer drugs that year. And we see, if we look at 2013 to 2016, it rises from 90,000 to nearly 107,000. Then it goes down again and then goes up a bit. So it fluctuates. In the pre-pandemic period, it fluctuates. Then it rises slightly in the year 2020 and then increases very sharply to 152,000 respectively 154,000 in the year 2022. If we present this graphically, we see this brown curve, fluctuations within two standard deviations from a growth area and then a massive increase in the year 2021, 2022 to over 150,000 cases. If you do the comparison, the one that wanted to be made in the health survey, calculate the increase from 2017 to 2022, then the value increased by 94%. So there were 94% more recipients of cancer drugs. In the year 2020, so in the pandemic year, when I have not had so many cancer drug recipients, we have plus 9%, but then we have plus 95% from the long-term trend and even plus 106%. So in short, we have a doubling of the number of cancer cases. This is not five times more as in this distorted statistic of the Federal Office, which has also been retracted, but it's not nothing. It's a very high value when we have twice as many people who are dependent on cancer drugs and cancer treatments.

Then immediately the question arises, is vaccination the cause? For the vaccination as the trigger for the cancer cases speaks to the timing pattern, that this spike begins precisely in the year of the vaccinations. If now, however, Corona were the trigger for cancer cases, why is the corresponding increase missing in the year 2020? Does it take that long until Corona has an effect? And also then one must say, yes, then but the vaccination was not able to prevent the severe courses that lead to cancer. So even then, the vaccination doesn't turn out convincingly. If a third factor were responsible, which cannot be excluded but then what could that be? What could explain this sudden and extremely significant increase?

I hope to provide a bit more clarity there. I thank Helsana for the fact that they did not alter their statistics in 2022 so that a time series emerges that can still be interpreted today and I thank you for your attention.
--------------------------------------

Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 7 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised and official data appears to be massaged.
Whoops! I called up my friends in the pharma industry for some cancer sales data... Here's a preview of what they shared!

🚨🚨🚨
Dr. Robert Malone's @RWMaloneMD address to the Members of UK Parliament (4th December 2023).

"On the current data of somewhere between 700 and 1000 peer-reviewed studies regarding the safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events I'm just gonna list them myocarditis including tachycardia, reproductive health damage women all over the world know about the damage to their menstrual cycles ... blood clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to peripheral ocular and central nervous systems including stroke, immunologic and oncologic harms which cold is going to be speaking about and the biggest adverse event of all, death"

TRANSCRIPTION FOR LOCAL TRANSLATION----
Thank you, Pierre, and now I call on Dr. Robert Malone to give his evidence.

So I'm Robert Malone. I'm a physician and scientist, and I need to acknowledge that my middle name is Wallace, and Andrew has assured me that I will not be drawn and quartered for what I'm about to say.

First off, I wish to speak extemporaneously to you rather than slides. There is an unmet need for a rapid response capability to allow a global capacity to mitigate the risks of emerging infectious disease and engineered pathogens. That is a valid concern. The technology has developed to a state where almost anyone with an undergraduate degree in biology can weaponize pathogens. We know, here in the United States, as somebody with security clearance in the biodefense industrial complex for the DOD, that the binary weapons that were developed by the U.S. military for deployment, potentially as a countermeasure against the Russian tank threat, can be readily reproduced by virtually any biologist in their garage currently. So there is a valid threat. There is an unmet need.

Ostensibly, this technology has advanced this mRNA or modified messenger ribonucleic acid based gene therapy vaccination technology was advanced on short notice because there is an unmet need for a platform technology that would allow a rapid response capability. That's the justification.

Furthermore, the justification was that we had a pathogen based on modeling here in the U.K. at Imperial College that had a 3.4% case fatality rate. And we would potentially be seeing mass graves, people dying in the streets, vans full of bodies outside of hospitals, et cetera.

That was all a lie. We knew that was a lie very early on, but the people that spoke the truth that actually gathered the data, such as happened at Stanford, that demonstrated that we had a case fatality rate of about 0.02%, okay? Not 3.4%. Despite having that knowledge, having it available in the first quarter, early in the first quarter of 2020, there was a concerted effort to justify the imposition of this technology in a rapid fashion on the basis of the thesis that there's a 3.4% case fatality rate associated with this virus.

What transpired in that rush was a fundamental breach of both ethics and regulatory norms that have been developed over decades. We're all familiar with this. We're all familiar with the policies that have been put in place since World War II in Nuremberg, that humans, human beings, have the right to informed consent. And what was done here in a haphazard way under the justification ostensibly that we had to, we had to essentially reject, throw into the rubbish norms that had been developed over decades, both for assuring vaccine safety and for assuring informed consent in patients, was all, all had to be jettisoned on short notice because of the threat of a 3.4% case fatality rate and the need to move a potential countermeasure forward without the due process that normally would take place.

That's what transpired. And I can tell you, you know, I'm labeled as far right in all the pejoratives that we're all so familiar with, including being a conspiracy theorist, but all I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology when I was a young man back in 1987 to 1990. I'm very, very familiar with the technology, worked as an academic to try to advance it until I determined that I could not overcome the toxicity associated with it and abandoned it for other technology platforms, which I also developed.

But in this case, what, what I have objected to is that as a physician and scientist who is well-trained in clinical research and regulatory affairs, that we have decimated my, my discipline. We have rejected the knowledge that myself has, have contributed to and all of my peers and colleagues over decades about how one should do this, how one should act, what steps one should take in order to ensure that we have safe and effective products for humans.

It's that simple. And furthermore, that we have rejected the norms that have been developed since World War II to respect human dignity, to ensure that human beings are treated as, as humans. They are, their, their autonomy, their sovereignty is respected, that they are provided with informed consent. Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products and their developmental state, their immature developmental state, we were given a series of lies.

Those lies included that these products were safe and effective, of course, without actually qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall safe and effective was repeated again and again and again without stating what that meant, okay? That's neuro-linguistic programming. That's psychological operations. That's propaganda. We also received the propaganda that these products would remain at the site of injection and the draining lymph nodes.

That was known to be a falsehood before these products were ever deployed into humans. Furthermore, and that's revealed by the, the non-clinical data packages from Japan and from Australia that have now been disclosed, okay? So we knew that these products deployed all through the body. We knew that they didn't stay where they were injected. We were also told the falsehood that these products in, had a molecule, this modified ribonucleic acid, which would only last in your body for a short period of time. We now know that these products remain in your body, remain biologically active for an undetermined period of time of at least weeks and probably months, another lie.

We were also told that these products were, it was necessary that none of us would be safe until we were all safe. This was part of a propaganda campaign to insist that we all accept these products. And that was done, by the way, in violation of well-established norms. That involved coercion, compulsion, and enticement. Ice creams for children to take your jab, or hamburgers, or whatever the enticement was, that is illegal. That is not something that is allowed under standard, well-established bioethics, okay? So this, this series of lies was used to justify deployment of these experimental products, truly with great profit margins, no doubt, which were intended to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of a vaccine platform technology that then, according to a hearing of the WHO in 2020, as I recall, headed up by Margaret Liu, 2019? 21. 2021, thank you, Jill, was, were established that this would become a platform and all that would be necessary in the future would be to swap in a new RNA sequence, okay?

Now, what we need to resolve the controversy regarding the toxicities associated with this, because we now clearly know that these are neither safe nor effective. We knew at the time, Pfizer knew at the time, these products would not prevent infection. They would not prevent replication and spread of the virus. Now the data is suggesting they don't even augment, they certainly don't protect against death or prevent against death and disease. We all know that. But that was what was asserted at the time and what we need to resolve all the controversy that swirls around these products and whatever the latest data disclosure is, is for governments to just be open and transparent.

That's my core message. All I'm asking for is that we be allowed to access, in an open and transparent fashion, the data which NHS and the healthcare agencies of the world have acquired, so that those data can be analyzed. So we no longer have to wrassle over whether this data is good or that data is good. has this flaw etc etc let's all disclose in an open transparent way so that the world's scientists can evaluate that data and put to rest this controversy about whether or not these products are safe and effective. On the current data of somewhere between 700 and 1000 peer-reviewed studies regarding the safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events I'm just gonna list them myocarditis including tachycardia, reproductive health damage women all over the world know about the damage to their menstrual cycles that's now these are all things that are widely acknowledged peer-reviewed multiple hundreds of studies reproductive health coagulopathy including stroke that means blood clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to peripheral ocular and central nervous systems including stroke, immunologic and oncologic harms which cold is going to be speaking about and the biggest adverse event of all, death so in conclusion what we've had here is a rushed product a rushed technology a failure to provide respect for humans in not allowing them to have informed consent and furthermore actively deploying the most massive propaganda campaign in the history of the modern world to suppress the ability of the public to gain access merely to have the knowledge of what the adverse event risks are and I come to you with one request open the books let's see the data and let's allow those data to be examined so we no longer have to have this you know these little fights over these little details we can actually get to the bottom of one of the most important questions the world is facing right now where these products actually safe and effective?

Thank you for your time!
--------------------------------
Emailable format here for those outside X

aussie17.com/p/important-dr…

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨💥💥Wow!!
Health Minister of Colombia, Guillermo Alfonso Jaramillo slams experimental vaccine in an astonishing outburst!

------------------------------------
We are playing with the lives of Colombians, we cannot be a factor of experimentation. All of us who are vaccinated today, today, with the exception of those who took Sinovac,

I have three from Sinovac, all the new technology is a technology and all the vaccines entered here without permission, we went and became an experiment.
All Colombians who are vaccinated served for the largest experiment that has been carried out in the entire history of humanity.

We cannot continue experimenting with the Colombian community, much less with the indigenous people, with the blacks and with the poorest of this country, with the peasants.
-----------------------------------

Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 2nd Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.
Mr. Jaramillo, who is also a surgeon, during his appearance before the First Commission of the Senate of the Republic, said “Every vaccinated Colombian has contributed to the largest experiment ever conducted in human history.

Read more here
aussie17.com/p/experimental…

🚨🚨🚨
Important Whistle-Blower information coming out of New Zealand - 30th November 2023.

It's an hour long clip but I edited some highlights and key analysis. Please watch!

------------------------------------------------------
I was involved with building a project, helped with implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called a pay per dose system. So that means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it, I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated.

"the chances of that occurring naturally by chance is almost impossible."

"Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that people were dying almost straight away after being injected. So that sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I love science. It's my all time favorite. I've got a master's degree in science."

"Because it's a payment system and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with one database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good in I.T., I was able to manage and build the system and be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it would be very difficult for one person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of its size and because it's got really good I.T, I happen to be the one."
-------------------------------------------------------

Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 30 Nov 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.
Full video rumble.com/v3yqgsf-liz-gu…

🚨🚨🚨
Malaysia's top MSM newspaper (New Straits Times) reporting ...

Vaccine side effects lawsuit against Ministry of Health, Pfizer, Astrazeneca to be heard in High Court today.

(There's no Moderna in Malaysia).

-------------------------------------
November 28, 2023
Lawsuit over Covid-19 vaccine effects involving the government and KJ to be heard today

KUALA LUMPUR: A lawsuit involving claims of side effects from Covid-19 vaccine filed against the government, Health Ministry (MOH), and former Health minister will be heard today.

The scheduled hearing for the related lawsuit is set to take place at the High Court here via a video conference at 9 am.

Besides the government and MOH, the lawsuit also involves former Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin Abu Bakar, former Director-General of Health Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah, and three Covid-19 vaccine producers: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Pharmaniaga.

The plaintiffs demanded that the defendants be held responsible for the side effects of the Covid-19 vaccine injections, including severe complications leading to death, permanent disability, and other complications resulting in losses.
Moreover, the plaintiffs insisted on all subsequent vaccines undergoing clinical trials, with complete reports on the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines in controlling the pandemic's transmission.

The plaintiffs also called for a temporary restriction on administering the Covid-19 vaccine to Malaysians until clinical studies are conducted with detailed reports presented.
Source nst.com.my/news/crime-cou…

🚨🚨💥💥
Phillipines launches investigation into EXCESS DEATHS in the country.

We are shocked to find out that there were 262,000 excess deaths on 2021 alone.

By comparison there were only 66,000+ covid deaths from 2020 to Nov 2023

Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Philippines Dan Fernandez:
-----------------------------------------------------
The copy of the said resolution, this is about a 260,000 excess deaths that we experienced in this country.

We'll be showing a graph coming from the Philippine Statistics Authority. In DOH (Department of Health) they also have copies that have been submitted. We are shocked to find out that there were 262,000 excess deaths on 2021 alone.

After that, 2022, still had 67,000 excess deaths
These are all unexplained deaths (non-covid)
---------------------------------------------------------
aussie17.com/p/breaking-phi…

🧵
1. I worked in Pharma for almost 20 years - mainly with the covid vaccine manufacturers as a commercial director.

The vaccines are not safe and effective so I didn't take them.

Please read the threads below to get an insider's view of how the Big Pharma machinery works.
2. Here's how we calculate Net Patient Value

(How much we can make per patient)

https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1610627264038707200