How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1630607586490761219Failure of these IFV families is down to three main factors; a lack of adequate armour protection; the non-IM explosive fills used in their 100 mm munitions; & the format of their ammunition stowage system (examples attached). Trooper-carried munitions may also be problematic.
https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1525051457745084417Unfortunately, though a great image, the view of the munition isn’t clear. As such it could be one of three munitions, which look very similar. However, as far as I can tell, it is not firing a 3VF4 (3ВФ4) round & hence the 3F5 (3Ф5) Smel'chak (Смельчак) guided projectile.
https://twitter.com/burytheminash/status/1524867715818831904The 3OF22 has a 3-part body with: a fuze adapter/booster holder at the front; a forward ogival nose assembly; & a partitioned rear body assembly. The ogival nose & front cavity in the rear body hold the explosive charge, the rear cavity in the rear body holds the rocket motor.
https://twitter.com/TayfunOzberk/status/1515052301123309575The 3R-41 radar control system provides missile & target tracking, plus command links. When writing the Jane's Naval Weapons (JNW) entry on the system, reference material stated it 'can' be used to search, but the vessel's search radar is normally used.
https://twitter.com/Liveuamap/status/1513585769214103554Various video frame captures show the highlighted submunitions falling or exploding. The bottom left & bottom right images show the same submunition, its fuze's self-destruct (SD) mechanism operating correctly after a short period of time.
https://twitter.com/ua_industrial/status/1513829330354417665Seen in the images are: top left (TL) = the internal diaphragm between the 2 payload areas of the warhead; TR = the fuze remnants attached to the forward nose body; BL & BR = burnt-out incendiary submunitions.