Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
The FBI Nudged My Baby with Lies🍀🐦‍⬛🦤 Profile picture
The FBI Nudged My Baby with Lies🍀🐦‍⬛🦤
@bowlingnols
Person of Interest, probably. Substack: https://t.co/mRlQY72IjM Youtube: https://t.co/87wzVfj9qE
Jun 29 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Funny how if these people were consistent about this, it would mean that the allies couldn't bomb Germany or Japan during WW2, because that would be collective punishment & there were civilians in those countries who didn't want war & had no choice.
So the Axis powers would win. The point being, total avoidance of "collectivized punishment" is literally impossible if you define "collectivized punishment" as "political action that has negative outcomes for a group of people." Raising taxes & cutting benefits are both "collectivized punishments" for groups
Jun 18 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
As I touched on in another tweet, the Post-War Order's 2 moral imperatives (derived from being as unlike the new secular Satan, Nazis, as possible) were prioritizing minorities above majorities & to prioritizing individual autonomy over collective good.
The 1st overrode the 2nd. It was inevitable that the 1st would override the 2nd, for multiple reasons, including that it's more emotional & visceral, individual autonomy is inherently self-weakening, & only the West believed in the 2nd imperative while both West & East believed in the 1st.
Jun 16 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
To really properly answer these, we have to look at the time period where we were closest to having this happen. That's probably the 1970's.
To be blunt, the reason has more to do with drastically different social structures of the 2 "perpetrator minority groups" than anything. The US had a ton of "de-policing" and "soft on crime" policies and intelligentsia culture in the 70's. It was actually worse than the Woke era in this regard. With no internet, they could get away with far more. The movie Dirty Harry was a reaction to this. Image
Jun 15 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Christianity has been in decline as a political and social force for basically the entire 20th century. Heck, it had already started in the mid-19th, hence Nietzche's observations.
After WW2, its true replacement finally arrived: The Post-War Consensus.
Woke is a schism of that. The Post-War Consensus developed pretty much entirely as a reaction to the Nazis. Hence its obsession with minority rights & protections (even at the expense of the majority), and individuality & personal choice (even if they enable exploitation or cause total societal collapse).
Jun 1 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
This thread is full of leftists acting like they're having some kind of revelation about Woke working exactly how it was obviously designed to work.
Hear me out, maybe the "epistemic pitfall" wasn't a pitfall, because being racist against white people, for example, WAS THE POINT. Image Also LoL at Pot of Greed guy replying w/ the exact same thing OP is talking about. "Racism against white people was an excuse for MISOGYNY." Except it was mostly used by "women of color."
These people fundamentally haven't changed, they're just recalibrating the oppression stack.
Apr 29 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
The pairs up with a left wing behavior that is extremely prevalent and noticing should be commonplace:
"We say what we want to be true like it's a fact and act like it's fact, no matter how untrue it is." What has happened with "incel" is this tendency ran into semantic drift because the useful idiots picked it up without knowing that the emperor is naked & everyone is just pretending his suit is beautiful.
Useful idiots in this case being midwit and sub-midwit feminists.
Apr 22 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
This (the screencapped tweet) is such a dishonest framing of what happened. They weren't measuring the length of those women's swimsuits cause dudes would get boners if it was 1/4 inch short. They set a concrete, objective standard.
People push up on the standard to destroy it. So the ladies who want to push the boundaries wear something that's just a liiiittle shorter than the standard. The people who want no standard say, "Isn't this ridiculous?" Then it gets a little shorter. A little shorter.
Deconstruction to nothing by inches. We've all seen it.