A thread on Pfizer's Process 1 & Process 2. And why it matters that their vaccine was tested only.. on 252 persons - inconvenient truth revealed thanks to @joshg99 & @RetsefL
As a preamble, let's let @DrPaulOffit explain the rule of the industry: "The process is the product". 1/
The rule emerged in the 70s, due to the high complexity of biopharmaceutical & became widely adopted in the 90s, with p.e the 1987 FDA's guidelines on General principles of Process Validation, in order to reduce the risk of variability in drugs quality. 2/ fda.gov/files/drugs/pu…
Sep 29, 2023 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
With the sunglasses and the cap on, I hope ?
I'm watching your video as you suggested (I'm meticulous like that) - and so far this is a pure abuse of my time, John. You really need to learn to synthesize and trust your audience.
Where should I jump to hear something I don't know?
Might be related to the nano-tech junk @sasha_latypova was pushing 🤔
One might think that someone who spent her life in the pharma industry & studied the shots compo. would have mentioned "scale" or "sugar crystals" when showed most pictures, but nah.
We made a dive with Geoff Pain in the Pfizer Trials, in an attempt to reproduce the famous 95% Efficacy, which didn't exactly verified in real life testing.
Has someone succeeded before in that endehavour? openvaet.org/studies/review…
Thanks to @TheJikky for "its" precious lights!
1/
We're sharing the current status, along with a lot of data (and of course with the code used to generate it) in the hope it'll shorten the suffering of other researchers wishing to make sense of this data.
