J. R. Minot, M. V. Arnold, T. Alshaabi, C. M. Danforth, P. S. Dodds
We explore the dynamics of how Twitter users have responded to tweets made by Obama and Trump from their main accounts, @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump.
Mar 27, 2020 • 23 tweets • 6 min read
New NCOVID-19 paper thread:
“How the world's collective attention is being paid to a pandemic:
COVID-19 related 1-gram time series for 24 languages on Twitter”
1. We curate and share usage time series of 1,000 1-grams that have mattered in March of 2020 (words, emojis, hashtags, etc.) for 24 languages.
We hope other researchers can use these time series to connect with other data streams.
Feb 20, 2020 • 6 tweets • 3 min read
“Noncooperative dynamics in election interference”
New publication from our group in Physical Review E
journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/1…
Led by @d_r_dewhurst and inspired by Russian interference in the 2016 election, we simulate the timeless competition between red and blue
Jul 10, 2019 • 20 tweets • 8 min read
Now, we stretch out words naturally when we speak.
But stretched words (sometimes called elongated words) are fairly rare in book and other text corpora, and they aren’t represented well in dictionaries (if at all).
So we thought, let’s science this.
Stretchfulness in written text arrived in an abundant, accessible source with Twitter (along with the possible end of civilization but that issue is beyond the scope of our current project).
Dataset: 10% of all (140 character) tweets from September 2008 to the end of 2016.
Jul 10, 2019 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
New paper threeaaad!!!
Soooooo, we went exploring for stretchable words on Twitter, and we uncovered a strange and amusing realm of language:
“Hahahahaha, Duuuuude, Yeeessss!: A two-parameter characterization of stretchable words and the dynamics of mistypings and misspellings”
Stretchable words are undeniably real:
Oct 17, 2018 • 11 tweets • 5 min read
1/5 Op-ed in @nytimes uses Google n-gram data to claim "most religious and spiritual words have been declining in the English-speaking world since the early 20th century.” 2/5 While this statement could certainly be true, raw n-gram data is not able to support the claim due to underlying non-stationarity. The author is likely referring to trends like figure 5h in the original Culturomics paper, “God” is decreasing.