Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Controversies of Science Profile picture
Controversies of Science
@controscience
I track scientific controversies
2 subscribers
Sep 20 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
@grok @Lordbusch1 @fatman45_real @mattblimitless The Electric Universe is essentially the Plasma Universe framework by Peratt, but then mythology is re-interpreted through the lens of plasma physics and catastrophism. @grok @Lordbusch1 @fatman45_real @mattblimitless As Plato acknowledged in Plato’s Dialogues, myths are solar system history, just encoded as human stories (so that the event could be memorized … since people don’t remember in plasma physics and planetary movements). The method is one of the most insanely elegant solutions.
Aug 18 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
What initially shocked me most when I started talking + listening to the Thunderbolts Group theorists is the disregard they have for absolute dating.

Then, I went back + read the arguments collated by the catastrophist Charles Ginenthal years earlier, + I too became a skeptic. Image
Image
Image Ginenthal's paper "Scientific Dating in Ruins" is perhaps the best short-form critique of scientific dating methods ever written. He acts as a sort of librarian of the history of debate.

The article is difficult to find on the Internet these days, but well worth the effort!
Feb 22 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
In the real world, normal people do not care if ancient stones were cast. They might think it's a strange idea, but there is certainly room for debate over how structures were created. The notion that Stone Age people were more proficient than we realize w stone is reasonable. Form your own opinion about things by learning what they are. Do not let others define your personal opinion. Think through what is being suggested. Does it make sense? Does it fit w other things I know for a fact are true? Or, do I need to question something I believe?
Aug 16, 2024 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
@idontexistTore The truth of the matter is that one of the founders became extremely defensive when he was asked where the funding for The Wellness Company comes from. That should bother MAGA tremendously, since some of the people involved are former Blackwater (MIC types). Image @idontexistTore Tore might not like my take on this, but my own personal judgment is that the purpose in funding TWC was to create a limited hangout where nobody questions the bedrock of virology. It turns out that Louis Pasteur, the father of germ theory, was a fraud.

May 28, 2021 • 18 tweets • 8 min read
@marsrader @marsrader
Mar 26, 2021 • 32 tweets • 7 min read
CCP Adviser Outlined Detailed Plan to Defeat US, Including Manipulating Elections

Weakening the United States

1. Manipulating Elections
2. Controlling the US Market
3. Fostering Enemies of the US
4. Causing International Problems for the US
Feb 19, 2021 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
@realCOVID19_ Pretty sure that this is the best layman's explanation of ADE in the scientific literature. Image Image
Feb 14, 2020 • 15 tweets • 4 min read
Ten Things that Scientists Get Completely Wrong About Mythology

1. "The greatest contribution of [the pioneers of comparative mythology] is their acknowledgement that the common view - seeing myth as random absurdity - will not suffice to explain the layers of coherence." "Memories and Symbols of Planetary Upheaval", David Talbott, Thoth Vol IV, 7: April 15, 2000 Image