Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Curtis Yarvin Profile picture
Curtis Yarvin
@curtis_yarvin
More cool stuff at https://t.co/G2E1HeSdVf
2 subscribers
Jan 3 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
As AJP Taylor said, if Hitler had died in 1939, he would have been remembered as one of Germany’s greatest leaders.

Even at war, there were things H got right that most of his generals got wrong. Also the reverse ofc.

Surprising how many Weimar enjoyers you see in 2025 Most of Hitler’s mistakes, including his anti-Semitism, came from his provincial and poorly educated background. He just did not understand how the world outside Central Europe worked.

Easy to see why a person like this could think the US and UK were run by the Jews
Jan 1 • 12 tweets • 3 min read
It’s neither design nor accident.

Libs do think they’re doing the right thing. They have a variety of ideas, some naive, some Machiavellian or even Nietzschean, that tell them so.

But these ideas evolved not to be reasonable, but just to feel powerful. And often be powerful Libertarian memes cannot find a level playing field in the marketplace of ideas—not when the outcome of the market is in any way connected to power.

Before Wikipedia mattered, it was generally libertarian. Once it mattered, it became hard leftist. This was not a coincidence
Dec 3, 2025 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
They call the replacement a “conspiracy theory” because in their own narcissistic narrative they are genuinely motivated by helping the migrants.

They can never see that they are only emotionally attracted to causes that make them collectively more powerful This addictive desire is so powerful that it easily overwhelms any instinct for collective self-benefit or even self-preservation.

In the ruling class created by a century of this unbridled libido dominandi, any politics meant to benefit “self” or “us” is a social faux pas
Oct 14, 2025 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Not going to be contributing more text to this platform. I’ll use it to post links, promos, etc In almost all situations in which you are offered the choice between money and power, you should choose money.

This is only because in most cases the power is illusory, and in most of the rest it is just plain evil. But—
Sep 28, 2025 • 37 tweets • 7 min read
Using nonlethal munitions to brawl with these people is EXACTLY what they want. It will make their numbers grow week after week. It will make their dicks, for those possessing that organ, hard as tire irons.

Here’s why they’re not being rounded up & processed: cowardice. Thread If you arrest and don’t prosecute, that’s another lose.

They emerge grinning. They’re martyrs, like Jesus, but if Pilate had handed down a really stiff sentence like 30 days of probation and a 1000 shekel fine (instantly paid by some rich disciple)
Sep 25, 2025 • 12 tweets • 4 min read
It is so difficult to process the difference in orders of magnitude between the power of the left and the “power” of the right, even in office, that the pinpricks of the right are easy to paint as gigantic and unprecedented.

That’s why big things are easier than small things You simply can’t compare “Trump made a comment about a comedian who put a straight-faced lie about murder on the air” to “the Biden administration ordered the systemic censorship of social media.”

If we ramped our power up 100x, anyone could see that theirs was still 10x greater
Sep 14, 2025 • 11 tweets • 2 min read
Hey man I love Dilbert and hate cancer.

But nothing is as nauseating as the bloviating impotence of the normiecon.

Grok should have a “translate to English” button on this post. It would read:

“Surely someone is going to do something” Oh, we’re doing something. We’re getting a bunch of dickwads fired.

That’s great, especially when it lets us point out “cancel culture” was treating any evidence of dissent as if it was a sociopathic celebration of murder.

But it’s still a fundamentally rhetorical act
Sep 11, 2025 • 20 tweets • 4 min read
Everyone should read Bryan Burroughs’ Days of Rage and remind themselves that 50 years ago, in America, hippies were setting off like a bomb a day.

This didn’t end because the hippies lost. It didn’t end because they mellowed out. It ended because they won Image Our universities became hippie universities. Our kindergartens became hippie kindergartens. Our government became a hippie government and even learned to wage hippie war. Which involves a lot of JAG hippie commissars and doesn’t work very well.

Woke is just John Lennon hippieism
Sep 11, 2025 • 29 tweets • 5 min read
The Institute for Effective Democracy (IED) is a new nonprofit which builds open-source software that helps voters take back control of their governments.

This app, “Ulysses,” (after President Grant) could in theory be used anywhere in the world. Its first use case is the US How can we make democracy more effective?

Democracy meqns the voters control the government. The more power the voters have, the more democratic the country.

But the voters don’t have infinite energy. The more efficiently we use their energy, the more effective our democracy
Sep 10, 2025 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
Chris, the anon right isn’t patrolled. It’s curated.

A curated space is based on reputation, formal or informal. Noise in the space is just annoying. Bad ideas only matter if they infect good people.

A patrolled space is—what you’re used to. You can nutpick all day long and idc What you are really asking the anon right to do is “read the room,” certainly always a professional necessity in any patrolled space. The admin is a patrolled space, and it has to be.

But as they say: you can read the room, or you can lead the room
Sep 7, 2025 • 17 tweets • 3 min read
Notice the “othering” of “Democrat Party”—an exonym. Democrats say “Democratic.” Always.

Anthropologically, exonyms are a normal aspect of martial hostility. What puzzled me when I started noticing this 20 years ago was an anomalous absence of hostility—given these circumstances Carlyle called it the “Universal Sluggard-and-Scoundrel Protection Association.”

This was in 1850. Odds are, if you’ve had a disease for 175 years, it’s a pretty serious freaking disease.

I used to be firmly against using martial rhetoric and it’s not really to my taste. But
Sep 6, 2025 • 19 tweets • 4 min read
All the pathologies of hardcore normie conservatism shine in this exchange.

One: delusional optimism. This chart shows the AfD *losing* in Saxony-Anhalt, a province of East Germany, 61 to 39.

The whole point of the AfD is that all the other parties are one party! Even in their stronghold, for Americans idk Georgia, these Neanderthal Ossies cannot get it up to crack 40%.

Even with what is being done to them. The “rape of Europe.” A *statutory* rape, I’d say

But still: incomplete combustion. Near total failure to activate the population
Sep 3, 2025 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Indeed the paper shows “how easily transmissible hepatitis B can be”: not easily at all!

That you’re defending this, as though any reasonable person would expect your link to refute, not support, your argument, is depressing. I actually expected you to correct and apologize Image And it really shows the shitty, shitty state of ethical praxis in science today, because you’re obviously on the right side of the bell curve when it comes to genuine scholarship.

I dropped out of my PhD program 30 years ago when I realized people thought stuff like this was ok
Aug 9, 2025 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Progressivism is a decentralized religion.

Our definition of “religion” points toward centralized/Catholic forms, away from decentralized/Protestant forms. And toward the supernatural.

Remove both magic and authority, and you’ve dodged the immune system. Unitarianism = cancer Neutralizing the political immune system, by eliminating both magical entities/rituals and religious authorities/doctrines, lets the cell line flourish on a third energy source: secular power

Harvard has been Unitarian for 200 years Image
Jul 30, 2025 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Fundamentally, conservative donors focus on issues. Liberal donors focus on people.

When you’re focusing on issues, you’re taking a basically VC like approach in which impact replaces profit. When you’re focusing on people, you’re like: is this a person I want to own? So for a liberal donor, what matters is the scale and quality of their private army—and scale is more important than quality. This is the Mackenzie Bezos vibe.

For a conservative donor, philanthropy is about specific objectives, and (as in VC) quality is the most critical thing
Jul 30, 2025 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Imagine thinking you could change this without plenary authority.

Conservatives used to think they owned the country. Then they thought they had to stop the train. Now they think they have to just give it a nudge, and the wheels will go back on the track. My brother in Christ Conservative billionaires be like: freedom of speech will solve it! We’ll just have a big New England town hall, but on the Internet. And reason will prevail.

You haven’t lived till you’ve had to nag a billionaire to pay a $5000 research tab to some broke grad student. Seriously
Jun 5, 2025 • 16 tweets • 5 min read
You can’t even tell if these people:

(a) deny that civilians were held in fields behind barbed wire for months

(b) believe they flourished in these conditions, with suburban death rates

(c) believe the stats are a lie but only by 10x, not 100x

(d) believe it was a big oopsie They can reason logically through these points, but it makes no impression, because it does not match the vibe—their narrative of 1945.

Nothing like this could happen in their Marvel-movie 1945. I might as well have Logic that says a man-eating rabbit ate a million people
Jun 4, 2025 • 33 tweets • 9 min read
GM are you ready for some Content. Special welcome to New Yorker readers. It’s Wednesday but this Wednesday won’t be like the others.

I would like to experiment on your brain. A very special History—made from just one Wikipedia page.

You will be the same, but better. Thread It’s the Wikipedia page titled “Rheinweisenlager.”

DON’T read it until after the experiment. We’ll be using only screenshots. Elon won’t let me link.

Also it just messes with the procedure. (Don’t worry I’ve treated many IRL. All still living)
May 12, 2025 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
“Evil.” Reminder that your institutions killed 20 million people and then covered it up. Spare me the pearl clutching.

What I learned: actually, no one cares enough ABOUT POWER to create alternative institutions, then install them. Like you, they would rather just preen The big lie from your fishwrap masters is that the libertarian billionaires they hate—because they are the only threat to the system—only care about power.

This is libs, who only care about power, projecting.

If I was trying to look good, I would be selling the same lie as you
May 11, 2025 • 21 tweets • 4 min read
I apologize for my ad hominem attacks on Scott Alexander.

I should not chastise him for once editing me out of his blog. I should praise him for mentioning me at all, thus unavoidably enduring a vast multiyear crapstorm. It’s Sunday and this is what Jesus would say.

Also Scott asks a perfectly fair question: why I used to pearl-clutch so hard about authoritarian populism in 2008, but am perfectly okay with the Trump administration in 2025–despite all its manifest errors, incompetences, and even cruelties?

Surely the answer is that I’ve Sold Out
Mar 16, 2025 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
Old regimes, like the Bourbons and the USSR, develop a suicidal energy. Nothing can harm them physically, yet they seem to want to harm themselves Glasnost was a terrible idea, for the USSR. So was calling the Estates, for the Bourbons. Many obscure regimes also die in this way, eg, Greek colonels