Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Dan Hind Profile picture
Dan Hind
@danhind
Studying political philosophy at the University of York. Occasional publisher, writer, and podcaster.
William Hite Profile picture 1 subscribed
Jul 2 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
A month ago I was wondering out loud why the British establishment converged on austerity after 2008 and whether it was part of a coherent class project to protect capital from a population that might have drawn dangerous conclusions from the collapse of economic orthodoxy. While warbling about the role of the Treasury I was gently prompted by @aerondavis to read his book on the Treasury, and I did. It's well worth a look. I don't think we can yet say for sure whether the Treasury in the 2010s was as clear-eyed as it was in the 1920s.
Jun 28 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
We are drifting into another round of PFI boondoggles, in which energy and other essentials will generate rents for the world's laziest plutocrats. A movement for constitutional reform worth a damn would declare this illegitimate and campaign to stop it.

We *know* we need to invest heavily in renewable energy, in food security, and in all kinds of public infrastructure. There is no reason to rely on private rent seekers to finance it. To repeat, we should make it clear from the outset that any revival of PFI will be reversed.
Jun 17 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Interesting thread on the composition of panels on Question Time. Two points to note: 1. Lucas appeared more often than Farage because the study begins in 2014. An analysis of 2010-15 had a different result. theguardian.com/news/datablog/…
2. There's a startling absence of trade unionists among regular non-politicians, and an overwhelming preponderance of (right-wing) comment journalists. This results from the labour movement giving up its communicative assets after 1945, putting its trust impartial liberal media.
Jun 14 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
The most important left grouping in France is led by a former Socialist Party politician, Jean-Luc Mélenchon. I would have thought that a Popular Front in the UK would need the left in the Labour Party, including major figures, to walk away, like Mélenchon did. There's a very real chance that Labour will implode on contact with office. It's a brittle political project, and its own structures and broader institutional hinterland have decayed into cronyism, much like the Socialists in France. Starmer might be Labour's François Hollande.
Jun 1 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
🧵 What's always going to puzzle me is why the 2015-2019 leadership team didn't do everything they could to give the Guardian readers in Labour a crash course in what they were up against, especially when their head of strategy had worked at the Guardian for most of his career. They must have known that the Guardian wasn't going to tell their readers what was going on and what was at stake, would do their best to defeat them, so why didn't they do everything they could to displace it as the main source of information for most of their supporters?
May 6 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Yep, that's definitely what happened. No need for further analysis, let alone investigation. Another layer of journalistic lacquer on what happened in 2019, and we're left with half-formed questions and a vague sense that something untoward is going on. theguardian.com/books/article/…
Image Gosh, why would that be, and what does it tell us about the recent behaviour of both the duopoly parties? Fragmented and politically complex in what ways? Again we are left surrounded by question marks, like a concussed duck in a Loony Tunes cartoon. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Image
May 4 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Reform won 2 councillors in a Conservative borough this week, & lost their one councillor in a Labour city. The Greens beat Labour in every ward in central Bristol. They're the real opposition to Labour in many places, where's their BBC piece??bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi… Labour were also defeated in many places by independents, some of whom are former Labour councillors. Again, they look like a much more plausible "real opposition" than Reform. Where is the reporting on this, and on its implications for the general election?
Apr 15 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
We should never get tired of repeating that politics and the media in this country since the financial crisis has been monopolised by people who think that everything is basically fine, and that those arguing for an alternative to Thatcherism are dangerous extremists. This means that the pool of competent people to draw on to populate government and political journalism gets shallower all the time. Since 2010 our PMs have been a daft posho, an authoritarian weirdo, another daft posho, whatever Liz Truss was, and now a libertarian nitwit.
Mar 19 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
"As we did at the end of the 1970s, we stand at an inflection point ..." There's a bit of rote Democrat-copying going on here as usual: Reeves is referencing Thatcher as Obama referenced Reagan - working with the grain of media-induced amnesia ...
theguardian.com/business/2024/… But it is useful to remember what Thatcherism was: a carefully planned project to revive the investing class at the expense of the working majority. It was given space by the refusal of the centre left to recognise the limits of postwar social democracy, and move beyond them.
Nov 22, 2023 • 11 tweets • 2 min read
The UK Chancellor today is doing what Chancellors always do in the face of economic stagnation and declining living standards: giving state subsidies to private investors. The stated purpose of this is to encourage them to invest more and so improve productivity, wages etc. 🧵 The problem is that UK private investors aren't interested in, or good at, directing real resources towards domestic projects that will increase living standards for the majority who work.
Jun 24, 2023 • 26 tweets • 6 min read
The current mainstream debate on the economy mostly revolves around whether the BoE was too slow to raise interest rates, which sounds much like one 18th century doctor complaining that their rival waited too long before starting to bleed the patient. Inflationary pressure isn't coming from the great majority of middle and low income earners. Increasing the mortgage interest payments of people who are already have less discretionary spending won't do much to dent inflation caused by supply shocks and corporate price-setting.
Apr 4, 2023 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Thatcher's reckless pivot from industry to finance in the 80s was paid for by North Sea oil. We could have been the largest country in Scandinavia but those vandals turned us into a world leader in money laundering and real estate fraud, held together by vicious right wing media. Nigel Lawson is being talked about today as if he put us on the road to prosperity. And you only have to look around to see how preposterous that is. Until we can discuss the vast scale of his failure, our politics will be victim-blaming bullshit.
Dec 17, 2022 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Further to this, we need a Community Health Building approach. Publicly funded R&D would test large scale interventions that don't conform to the Pharma's patentable molecule approach. This could be funded by the surplus from NHS Generics (an idea proposed by Corbyn). These experiments, in diet and lifestyle interventions and innovations like universal basic services, as well as Virchow-type interventions in democratic self-determination as a treatment for diseases of despair, would provide an evidence base for broader policy-making.
Dec 11, 2022 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
One of the striking things about this graphic is how it shows that an excellent healthcare system can be embedded in an extremely unhealthy society. Until 2013 we were very well looked after, while many of us were incredibly unwell. Constant attacks on the NHS (billed as "reforms") serve as a distraction from the key question: what drives ill health at the level of the population? And the answer to that is economic, political and communicative oligarchy, which is to say Toryism in all its forms.
Dec 1, 2022 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
The Conservatives have been in power since 2010 and 100s now die every week because the NHS is understaffed and underfunded. The media have supported them all the way. If that doesn't fill you with dread, anger and zeal for a new way of doing politics, I don't know what to say. We are now in the media consensus comfort zone, where we can only get rid of the Conservatives by consolidating the power and laundering the reputations of the same people who undermined effective opposition to them in 2010, 2015, 2017 and 2019.
Oct 1, 2022 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
This is a fascinating exchange. A journalist asks how come everything is on fire. Someone asks if maybe the media's treatment of Labour 2015-19 had something to do with it. This, we are told, is "naive". Image We now learn that blaming media is naive because "it assumes that people are idiots." Note that no one has said this, and the argument that the media are influential absolutely does not depend on the idea that people are idiots. Saying it does is amazing. Amazing. Image
Sep 23, 2022 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
Remember when a very rich man, humiliated by a leading tabloid newspaper, set about putting it out of business, and in the process we discovered that much of the media were operating as a criminal syndicate, and then it all went away again? Fun times. We have no means to discuss public business as discursive equals. Every now and then a foreign news outlet - Al Jazeera, the New York Times - will document how hilariously bent our media-political institutions are. But at the moment there’s not much we can do.
Aug 7, 2022 • 11 tweets • 2 min read
In 2019 many people were persuaded that a Labour government under Corbyn would be a material disaster or a moral catastrophe, or both. Many more were convinced that he was 'just like the rest of them'. The result was a decline in the Labour vote and a Conservative victory. We ought to have a conversation about what happened, because it really matters that a political party offering an end to 40 years of neoliberal asset-stripping and spivvery was crushed in the polls by a government committed to more of the same.
Jul 23, 2022 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
So much politics this week in Westminster that there was no time to mention publication of the Forde Report, much less to debate its findings, including its claim that the elected leadership was as guilty of factionalism as the unelected bureaucrats who undermined them. At this point everyone who thinks that they are well informed about politics because they read the Guardian and the New Statesman and listen to Radio 4 are as deluded as the most distracted and impressionable Sun or Mail reader.
Jul 21, 2022 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
One of the joys of this platform is that it allows us to compare and contrast the analyses of politics professors at elite universities and anonymous accounts. And, I ask you, which of these two would you go to for political analysis, if your life depended on it? And it's not that the professionals of speech only come up short in a few one on ones. Elite discourse around politics in the media as well as academia has converged on a set of assumptions that downplay or eradicate the role of communicative power in shaping outcomes.
Jun 14, 2022 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
There was a flurry of irritation on the timeline a few days ago about all the lovely money the Trash Future podcast makes every month, and I thought I would use that as hook to hang my regular messaging about the need for a structurally left media system. First off, the stakes. If the left wants to win, it has to have its own media. If you don't believe me, ask Victor Orban, who told his conservative allies in the US that to win they had to "have their own media." There's no way round this, no objective material conditions, no charismatic leader.