Compare to the active ingredients in Woman® Profile picture
Epistemic justice warrior. Rootless cosmopolitan. Crazy aunt. My cyborg uprising will be intersectional or it will be bullshit. they/themself Mx./Dr.
Jan 13, 2022 12 tweets 3 min read
"We must accept the reality that this will be with us forever as an endemic disease."

Fair enough.

I’m not an epidemiologist, but my understanding is that endemicity is an equilibrium situation.

[gestures wildly about]

DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A FUCKING EQUILIBRIUM TO YOU?

1/5
"You bleeding hearts just don't understand that every society needs to accept some number of preventable-in-principle deaths as a cost of doing business."

No, I fucking understand that.

I've been complaining to anyone who will listen about how we all need to accept that

2/5
Jan 13, 2022 5 tweets 1 min read
I feel like there's a lot of "but you promised that if we did everything we were supposed to it would be over by now". And, putting aside the thing where we collectively didn't do everything we were supposed to ... ... trying to bargain in this way with the people who offered in-hindsight-overoptimistic predictions involves this painfully obvious catastrophic misunderstanding of the basic causal structure of the situation.

And I am so tired.
Jan 12, 2022 4 tweets 1 min read
What the everliving fuck does "decadence" mean to this man? Screenshot of 2022-01-11 tweet by @DouthatNYT.  Text of twee And in what world is "Raya and the Last Dragon" not a love story?

Jan 11, 2022 4 tweets 2 min read
I'm glad there's been a movement on this, but if it was in their power to change it I don't understand why we're only seeing movement on this now. It's not like nobody noticed before. Holy shit they adjusted it once before sometime between 2006 and 2013, from must-be-white to preference-for-white. What the fuck was the rationale for changing it *exactly that much*?
Jul 12, 2021 7 tweets 2 min read
This is some hardcore Phyllis Schlafly garbage.

I realize that that describes everything they do, but this feels especially on-the-nose. Seriously OMFGs it's just this. Black and white photo of a number of people, most of whom ap
Jul 10, 2021 32 tweets 7 min read
🧵 Don't let them tell you that sexual violence comes mainly from "deviants" and "freaks".

Know that it comes mainly from "upright citizens", whom they will protect from accountability by pointing out how "normal" and "proper" they are. 1/8 Don't let them tell you that they're protecting you with norms of modesty and rules for who belongs where.

Know that they will always use these rules to discredit survivors by calling them immodest and asking what they were doing there. 2/8
Jul 9, 2021 6 tweets 1 min read
🧵 It's like the current wave of "GC"s/TE"RF"s encountered some unfair and unflattering caricatures of feminism in general and radical feminism in particular, and decided that the appropriate response was to enthusiastically embrace these views without a hint of irony. 1/5 A bitter MRA says "women want to be treated as equals but they also expect me to hold the door", and we start to explain that we are actually not fans of the door-holding, and then the "GC"s show up & insist on defending their sacred "sex-based right" to have the door held. 2/5
Aug 3, 2020 6 tweets 1 min read
I am unable to form a coherent response to this reply because my mathematics background, my linguistic semantics background, my phil language background, & my historical ling background are all yelling different horrified reactions. source: https://twitter.com/kavverz/status/12903478716367913 That's not how language change works! That's not how dictionaries work! That's not how mathematical definitions work! That's not how word meaning works! That's not how kind terms work! That's not how any of this fucking works!
May 30, 2019 7 tweets 4 min read
I am pretty seriously unnerved by the efficiency with which this conspiracy theory about stealing cis women's uteri has propagated through everybody's list of standard TE"RF" talking points for this news cycle. Like seriously ... the fuck?
Mar 31, 2019 13 tweets 2 min read
Will you entertain an analogy with me for a few tweets?

Suppose a woman - call her Rebecca - has had a long, misogyny-filled day, and in frustration she tweets that "men can all die in a fucking fire". (1/n) Now suppose someone with a grudge against Rebecca decides to report this as "Rebecca wants Jewish men to 'all die in a fucking fire'."

And suppose, further, that a number of Rebecca's detractors decide to promote this version of events ... (2/n)
Aug 27, 2018 10 tweets 3 min read
(thread)

This "don't call us TERFs" shit isn't special to TERFs.

Often enough, racists don't wanna be called racists, misogynists don't wanna be called misogynists, homophobes don't wanna be called homophobes &c.

(1/n) they're always "race realists"

or "nationalists"

or "just facing the facts"

or "recognizing biological innevitability"

or "traditionalists"

or "upholding family values"

or "just asking questions"

or "engaging critically with PC dogma"

(2/n)