I finished @DirectorMLK’s remarkable book last night and I really wish I had been able to read it sooner to incorporate it into my new Who Is a True Christian? book.

There are three key themes that connect to my work that I want to say more about. 🧵

https://twitter.com/dwcongdon/status/1768019203582280000

First, Martin's book demonstrates better than anything since @kkdumez's JJW the problems with the Bebbington Quadrilateral as a definition of evangelicalism. As Martin shows, Hoover did not fit the theology of evangelicalism, but he was an evangelical where it mattered: WCN.

I know it's #Oscars night, but I wanted to address a common objection I'm hearing from theologians in a brief 🧵

https://twitter.com/maklelan/status/1766534742697284064

The objection goes like this:

The "Angel of the Lord" concept is insufficient to address the theological concerns of the bishops at Nicaea. Something ontologically stronger is required to fulfill this purpose.

Put like this, I don't disagree. But there's a deeper set of issues.

Some brief theological thoughts on LOKI. A thread—with season 2 spoilers. Both seasons of Loki have explored this tension between predestination and free will, with the Sacred Timeline representing predestination and Loki and friends wanting to find some way to preserve free will.

1. THREAD on evangelicalism, "ancient/historic Christianity," and the antimodern discourse coalition of today's Christian Right—as well as a preview of my forthcoming @CUPReligion book, Who Is a True Christian? 2. As someone who knows Matt Milliner (@millinerd) from our days at Princeton Seminary, I have only good things to say about him as a person. But his latest piece in @commentmag is a perfect example of what I critique at length in my book. comment.org/waking-ancient…