2/ If the leaks are not given directly to Garret but to someone else, it strengthens the frontman hypothesis. You would never expose the person you get the sensitive information from that allows you to make hundreds of millions, especially in a delicate operation potentially linked to the CCP
2/ The timing and nature of a recent transaction clearly suggest it was based on privileged information. Who did the owner of the wallet track and got the info of the post from? It's a method those guys are using that makes it unlinkable with the White House 
2/ During August and September, he sold over 35,000 BTC for ETH, using both the SPOT and PERP via Hyperliquid/Hyperunit, employing a series of BTC wallets.
2/ From March to November 2016, @hellochow , provided confidential, non-public information about a potential merger involving Lattice and two firms (Firm-1 and Firm-2) to an individual referred to as CC-1. CC-1 used this insider information to execute profitable securities trades. This scheme constitutes insider trading, as Chow unlawfully shared material non-public insider information, enabling him to gain an unfair advantage in the stock market
2/ But what about Zachary? No one has exposed him yet, but $UAP found something interesting: @zachxbt is one of the biggest holders of corporate Telegram usernames. He’s been quietly building a side hustle while claiming to be the crypto watchdog. 😂 