Now that we know for certain that world leaders (the ruling elite) are trying desperately to maintain control of what we are allowed to speak/know, we should ask ourselves why that is.

Two Competing Theories: World leaders want to control what we know/speak. Why?

Two Competing Theories:

1. They have big hearts/they care about our well-being

2. They want to maintain and/or add upon their elite privileges (wealth, control, etc.)

Which one of these☝🏻two theories is most likely?

I distrusted certain experts who appeared to be more politically motivated than others… and that distrust served me well.

Why you would trust those “experts” who were propagating this nonsense [see below] is beyond me.

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1611736243104272385

This hilarious animated presentation of Fauci straining - presumably because of political agenda - to answer a simple, straightforward health related question, is a must watch.

Once the ruling class is able to silence honest doctors and scientists, SCIENCE™ can then be weaponized to further tyrannize an unwitting working class. This hilarious animated presentation of Fauci straining - presumably because of political agenda - to answer a simple, straightforward health related question, is a must watch.

Remember that time when Biden had a sudden moment of clairvoyance and was able to see that the late Jackie Robinson had taken possession of the Pope’s body? Look at that face— Jackie Robinson knew he just got busted.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐁𝐈'𝐬 𝐓𝐨𝐩 𝐓𝐞𝐧 𝐌𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭-𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐

1. The vaccine does not prevent spread

2. Natural immunity is real and, in fact, optimal

3. Ballot harvesting laws were changed in 2020 to give Dems a major electoral advantage 4. Biological men are naturally stronger than women.

5. This coronavirus most likely leaked from a gain-of-function research lab in Wuhan, China.

6. Placing every man, woman and child in lockdown will do more harm than good.

Is science supposed to vary according to the current needs of our ruling class? I wonder if government would also try to define, at its own convenience, “speech that espouses violence.” Of course they would, and they do.

Fortunately, there is no “hate speech exception” to the 1st Amendment.

This tradition of releasing tax returns is nothing but a scam that the establishment has been using for decades as a way to discourage outsiders and non-politicians from threatening their power. This pseudo requirement only benefits career politicians. Here’s why: If you’re a career politician (Biden, Clintons, Obama, Bushs, Newsom, etc) very early on in your life you’re going to structure every aspect of your financial life in such a way that when it’s presented on a tax return it doesn’t look different, or strange.

LIST OF BANNABLE SPEECH:

1. Natural immunity is preferred.

2. Current evidence shows that the vaccine does not prevent spread.

3. Ballot harvesting laws were changed in 2020 to give Dems a major electoral advantage.

(literally violence👇🏻)
4. Biological men can’t have babies. 5. This coronavirus most likely came from a gain-of-function research lab in Wuhan.

6. Placing every man, woman and child in lockdown will do more harm than good.

(also literally violence👇🏻)
7. A drag queen reading books to 6 year olds is sexually abnormal/grooming behavior.

Masks don’t control the spread of respiratory viruses. How do we know?

1. Widely studied and accepted prior to 2020.

2. Studies in favor of masking are shockingly weak.

3. Mountain of data from past 24+ months - if masks worked we would see some sign of it. But we don’t.
🧵 Fauci’s own words on the “science of masks”

How’s that “free” healthcare thing working out up there, guys?

🧵
The Left is trying to set the narrative that free-thinking journalists like @bariweiss & @mtaibbi are in it for the money.

If they were in it for the money they would be toeing the line & making nice with the Ruling Class/Washington elite, & Hollywood

https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/1601750976796319744?s=46&t=f7lTP3a9g9EVRJPEBQeuFQ

If money was their driving force, then they would just simply feed the machine what it wants; the way Ben Collins does it and Cenk Uygur, Jen Rubin, Jim Acosta, Sam Harris, Jimmy Kimmel, Joy Reid, and on and on and on…

I think this goes without saying but, corporate oligarchs, in collaboration with government officials, should definitely be the ones deciding what is & what isn’t safe speech. Anything else is clearly fascism and unsafe.

See below for examples of government-approved safe speech: Examples of government-approved safe speech:

DANGEROUS: The young are not at high risk & therefore should not be forced to get the shot.

SAFE: If little children don’t get the COVID vaccine then Grandma will probably die.

We’re looking at years and years of tyrannical one-party rule if we don’t somehow find a way to improve election security/integrity under these new COVID election laws. There’s no limit to corruption when politicians in power no longer need to be concerned with gaining and maintaining approval from their constituents. You can just win reelection by producing the necessary number of ballots even if it takes several days to do so.

Snide comments like these are objectively false. They’re also revealing.

I’ll tell you why: These comments are a result of the establishment still holding contempt & resentment for all the millions of us who voted for Trump. They’re still seething that Trump was able to dress Jeb (and the entire GOPe) in a clown suit. Trump exposed their true identity. They want revenge

I think this goes without saying but, Mark Zuckerberg - in collaboration with government officials of course- should be the only ones deciding what is and what isn’t allowed to be spoken online.

Anything else is clearly fascism.

🧵 Examples of safe speech:

❌ Mail-in ballot harvesting laws were changed to give Dems a major electoral advantage.

✅ Joe Biden is the most legitimately elected president in history.

-

❌ Biological men can’t have babies.

✅ Men are literally women if they feel like it.

[THREAD]
There are 19 counties who have voted the same as the rest of the country (no matter Republican or Democrat) with almost 100% consistency, in every single presidential election, going all the way back to 1984.

[continued] Number of times these same 19 counties did not match with the results of the general election going all the way back to 1984:

1984: 0
1988: 2
1992: 1
1996: 0
2000: 0
2004: 1
2008: 1
2012: 0
2016: 0
2020: 18 <———👀

In other words:

[continued]

It is now clear that the GOP Establishment made a concerted effort to make sure only establishment-friendly Republicans were given the best shot at winning, even at the risk of Republicans losing the Senate and/or the House. And I’ll tell you why:
1/9 Membership in the administrative state, the Washington establishment, the deep state, whatever you want to call it; membership in that club is truly special. There are perks to being an elitist in the Washington establishment.
2/9

For decades the Left has known that lazy & irresponsible people far outnumber the good and decent; that if they could just figure out a way to get them off their asses to register & vote they would have a lock on the electorate. They finally found it with dropbox mail-in voting. “Republicans are trying to make it illegal to have a miscarriage- sign here and we’ll drop your ballot off for you.” Neighborhood vote canvassing/harvesting. There’s no way to compete with that. And then on top of that, there’s no signature verification going on whatsoever.

It’s simply impossible. You’d have to have some kind of “well-funded cabal of powerful people” ranging across industries and united in purpose — “secretly” working behind the scenes under the guise of saving democracy — and that’s just crazy, tin-foil conspiracy koo-koo talk.

https://twitter.com/fake_news_u_r/status/1339260413096161290

time.com/5936036/secret…

I miss the happier days when Biden was just stumbling through the prompter, confusing Trump for George Lopez, wandering off the stage, bewilderedly looking for a voice in the rafters… This new raging, fascist Joe is just plane creepy. “George Lopez”

Science is showing that, against COVID, natural immunity is stronger and longer lasting than synthetic immunity. #PandemicOfTheUninformed
#FollowTheScience

deseret.com/platform/amp/c…

https://twitter.com/cdcgov/status/1374812266567241729

Ummm… what? This would only be true if a vaccine offers little to no protection against the virus.

Around 91.5 percent of children in the U.S. are vaccinated against the measles. Is it mostly vaccinated children who are testing positive for measles? It’s absurd!