SACRED CHORAL MUSIC 🧵

Here's a collection of some of my favorite sacred choral music of all time. It's chronological and by no means comprehensive! Certain classics like Handel's Messiah and standards like Silent Night aren't included but only because they're standards.
Enjoy🙏 In dulce jubilo (13th c.)

A traditional Christmas carol from the Middle Ages, the text is by German mystic Heinrich Seuse c. 1328. According to folklore, Seuse heard angels sing these words and joined them in a dance of worship.

Arr. Robert Pearsall

King's College Choir (2021)

The Men Who Killed Kennedy - Part 1: Coup d'État The Men Who Killed Kennedy - Part 2: Forces of Darkness

If you received the "polio" vaccine between the 50s to the 90s, you were likely given a cancer-causing bioweapon.

It's why we have a soft-tissue cancer epidemic today.

They've known this for 60 years. Dr. Bernice Eddy tried to warn the world and they destroyed her career. Dr. Eddy discovered that the monkeys in which the polio vaccine had been cultured were carriers of a cancer causing monkey virus.

NIH blocked her from publishing her findings and stripped her of her regulatory duties and laboratory.

ahrp.org/1955-1963-sv40/

This is Judyth Vary Baker.

She was a prodigy in the field of cancer research.

She was also the girlfriend of Lee Harvey Oswald.

Judyth's connection to the mysterious death of Dr. Mary Sherman could be the key that unravels the JFK assassination.

And Judyth is STILL alive!! 🧵 A focal point of this story is the grotesque death of prominent orthopedic surgeon Dr. Mary Sherman in 1964.

Initially blamed on a "sex-crazed lesbian," the details of her demise were hidden from the public for over 30 years. Dr. Sherman's entire arm and right side were missing!

This is Ruth Paine. She's a CIA agent who was Lee Harvey Oswald's handler for the Kennedy assassination (Lee was a patsy).
Ruth is STILL ALIVE and one of the main reasons why the JFK files are still sealed. This is a supremely evil human being. Here's a full documentary about Ruth Paine from 2022:

https://x.com/foundring1/status/1859991391985889494

This is Robert Mueller's wife, Ann.

Ann's grandfather was Charles Cabell, the #2 at the CIA (under Allen Dulles)...until JFK fired them after Bay of Pigs.

His brother was mayor of Dallas when they hit JFK.

Mueller covered up Waco, Oklahoma City, 9/11 etc.

The swamp runs deep. Investigator Jim Garrison almost publicly accused Charles Cabell of conspiring to kill Kennedy. He was even trying to confirm that Cabell stayed in Dallas that night. And that's the last we heard about that...

SANDY HOOK MEGATHREAD 🧵 This man is an expert on school safety and school shooting protocols. They destroyed his reputation and career for asking VERY valid questions about the SH response. This is one of the most damning documentaries the "debunkers" refuse to touch.

https://x.com/foundring1/status/1838992578693529638

Sandy Hook "witness" Gene Rosen pre-recorded an AUDITION TAPE for his role in the staged event 🚨🚨🚨 Introducing the WORST crisis actor in history, Gene Rosen.
If you can't spot this, you're an NPC.

https://x.com/foundring1/status/1838757081031282805

🚨ITALYGATE 🚨

The US 2020 election was STOLEN by Obama and the former PM of Italy, using satellites from Leonardo aerospace.

A sworn affidavit from the hacker involved was delivered to Congress on J6. Italygate is one of the most aggressively buried conspiracies of all time.🧵 Here's the testimony of Maria Zack, Chairwoman of , a government accountability advocacy group: NationsInAction.org

The Columbus Conspiracy 🧵

Was Columbus the illegitimate son of Pope Innocent VIII?
Was he an agent in the race to control the New World?
Did the financial powers behind Venice want it kept hidden?
Why has his story been manipulated, marginalized and memory-holed?
👇👇👇 Venice once controlled the world's finances for centuries. The Council of Ten was the main governing body of Venice, acting behind the scenes.

In 1204, the Fourth Crusade was manipulated by Venice. Instead of reclaiming Jerusalem, they sacked the city of Constantinople instead.

Sandy Hook was fake as fuck. 🧵

https://x.com/foundring1/status/1783868443466588162

🚨DEEP FAKE POTUS🚨

Is "Joe Biden" really president? 🧵 Let's start with his "inauguration" in January, 2021.

Was it staged? Was it prerecorded? Are there multiple versions?

What happened to the girls in the white and pink masks?

Doug Mills, who took the "one in a million" bullet picture, is the same guy who just happened to be on hand to catch the iconic moment Bush learned about 9/11. Huh.

👀
This picture of Bill Clinton was taken by Doug Mills in 1993.
The caption reads: "Clinton plays frisbee as a pair of unidentified children do underwater handstands in the ocean off the Kahala Hilton Hotel during a vacation in Honolulu, Hawaii. | Doug Mills/AP Photo"

🚨WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?🚨

Evidence of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11

PART FOUR: STAR WARS & PSYOPS

Many express disbelief that energy weapons exist outside of science fiction, until they're reminded of the Star Wars Program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

"The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) was set up in 1984 within the US Department of Defense to oversee development.

An array of advanced weapon concepts, including lasers, particle-beam weapons, and ground and space-based missile systems were studied, along with sensor, command and control, and high-performance computer systems needed to control a system consisting of hundreds of combat centers and satellites spanning the globe and involved in a short battle.

Reagan called upon American scientists and engineers to develop a system that would render nuclear weapons obsolete. Elements of the program reemerged in 2019 with the Space Development Agency (SDA)."

Energy weapons do exist and have been developed for over 100 years, and most of this technology is classified information. It can also be assumed that such technology exists in multiple countries.

In 2018 the US Department of Defense published the following:

“Directed energy weapon systems employ lasers, microwaves and particle beams against enemy targets. Each of these systems has its own advantages and each has its own disadvantages. We should not lose our way with some of the other technologies that were pioneered in the ’80s and early-’90s and now stand available for renewed effort.”

Since this tech was being developed in the 80s (and earlier), it would be very reasonable to presume it was ready to use on a grand scale in 2001.

The evidence from 9/11 rules out a Kinetic Energy Device (bombs, missiles, etc.) as the method of destruction as well as a gravity-driven "collapse."



defense.gov/News/News-Stor…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic…
The "Bathtub"

The World Trade Center was built on terra firma protected by an underground "bathtub" or foundation ring down to bedrock seven stories below the surface of lower Manhattan.

This sturdy enclosure some call the "slurry wall" shielded the foundation of the Twin Towers as well as WTC buildings 3 & 6. According to Wall Street Journal architecture critic, Ada Louise Huxtable, this structure "…saved lower Manhattan from the waters of the Hudson River" (WSJ 9-28-06, p. D8).

Many observers worried about whether the wall would continue to do its job to prevent flooding but "to the relief of the engineers, there is no evidence that the 70-foot-deep retaining wall around the basements has been damaged or breached, although the collapse of the towers left one section perilously unsupported."

In the SPIKE TV documentary about the iron workers at Ground Zero, one remarked, "You know, it was amazing, it didn't really damage [that much]...if they had fallen over sideways, could you imagine the damage to Lower Manhattan?"

There was no significant damage to the bathtub on 9/11. This picture looks west-northwest, from the center of the WTC 1 footprint.

🚨WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?🚨

Evidence of Directed Energy Technology on 9/11

PART THREE: HURRICANE ERIN & THE HUTCHISON EFFECT

Is there a connection between the Field Effects associated with hurricanes and energy effects involved in the destruction of the WTC Complex on 9/11? Hurricane Erin was "born" on about September 1st, 2001, and traveled up towards New York City. Hurricane Erin was closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before). Close-ups from photos of Erin on 9/11 clearly show the plume of material from the destroyed WTC.

Although Hurricanes Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), the media reported very little about the potential risk Erin posed around the time of 9/11, compared to what was reported regarding Katrina – even before Katrina made landfall.

The development of “super cell” storms and their structure is similar to that of a Tesla Coil (used to create high voltage electrical discharges). The electrical properties of large storm systems may have some similarities to those of Tesla coils and there is a possibility that technology exists to utilize or manipulate the energy in these storm systems for “secondary” purposes.

Hurricane Erin on September 11, 2001

This is a very important thread. Here’s why.

Was Sandy Hook a conspiracy? If so, what was the goal? If it was for more gun control (as is often claimed), it really wasn’t that effective. But what if Sandy Hook wasn’t some conspiracy to take away your guns? What if it was an assault on your right to freedom of speech? Was it orchestrated to criminalize skepticism and intimidate you from questioning the “official” narrative?

This picture of the Parker family could be the key that unlocks Sandy Hook. That’s because you might not even be looking at a “real” picture. And yet, this was an official press release of the Parker family from 2012. Emilie Parker (on the right) is said to have been one of the victims at Sandy Hook. So why did this post go viral? And why now?

Granted, these “AI image detectors” are notoriously inaccurate, but that’s NOT why this particular picture is so provocative. Forget the eerie digits and facial expressions…THE LITTLE GIRLS DON’T HAVE LEGS! You cannot convince me that there’s room for FOUR legs that can fit with their father. If true, that means this image has been artificially generated. The implications of this are astonishing.

There has been speculation that the victims actually survived. One theory takes this further by postulating that some of them were never even real in the first place. While this may appear to be in the realm of "high octane speculation" it certainly shouldn't be *criminal* to go there. Was “Emilie” a digital construct, crafted with inspiration from her flesh-and-blood sisters? Is that why she’s awkwardly placed on the side of so many family photos? Could this explain why her father Robbie was seen laughing and smiling after her supposed death? Who (or what) is Emilie Parker? This line of inquiry may be extremely agitating to some, but it would be disrespectful to her memory to NOT ask this question in light of all the surrounding evidence.

In 2012, the public had tools like Photoshop, but NOT the “AI” image generating tech we enjoy more than a decade later. In addition, the mother in this picture once admitted she HAD used Photoshop to insert her daughter Emilie into other family photos in the past. This curious admission is even stranger because THIS one was presented as being unaltered. The problem is, it really can’t be. The next problem is that this was probably NOT created by some mom using Photoshop in 2012. If it was, this wouldn’t have been presented as a real photo by the family and press. So if this is an artificially-generated image, figuring out WHO did it and WHY could lead directly to the perpetrators behind the deception. That’s why this is so potent.

I’ve shared this picture before but it didn’t get enough people to REALLY look at it. Using one of these less-than-accurate AI detectors ended up being a great way to get people to stop and actually examine this picture. It might already emit that certain uncanny valley vibe, but the nudge from the “detector” was a great additional visual cue that indeed something is amiss here. This created the perfect storm.

The result? This became my most viral tweet ever with 1 million+ views in a day. I also earned my very first community notes, which changed several times before ultimately being removed completely. The claims of the community notes ended up being just as revealing as the reception of the thread itself.

As a pattern recognition guy, it’s hard to condense all of the anomalies about manipulated events like 9/11 into an accessible and consumable package for normies. It’s one thing to process loads of information after years of research, scouring news broadcasts, reading books/articles and watching documentaries. But when you start to hit a neophyte with everything at once, your efforts can have the opposite effect. They may just shut down instead. It can actually be better to focus on ONE glaring anomaly, but it has to be a REALLY good one or else it won’t work. Once the normies see it, they can never unsee it and their awakening is often inevitable. This picture is one such anomaly that could undo Sandy Hook.

As a brief aside, I find it very interesting that much of my genuine content still seems to be heavily regulated, even after the Twitter→X transformation (I was banned for 4 months last year and then reinstated on October 7). But every once in a while, one of my more salacious and provocative tweets will somehow “break through” and actually reach a broader audience. It’s almost like they’re trying to tarnish my reputation with selective censorship by promoting only the “crazy” or "offensive" stuff I say (but hey, I’m just a conspiracy theorist! I supposed I could also try not to say offensive or crazy things but that's dumb).

Regardless of why it happened, this thread immediately showed signs of going viral. They had let it slip through...and with a post on the most controversial and dangerous subject in recent history! But something new happened next. Although I was getting a small number of angry comments denouncing my brazen effrontery for questioning the Sandy Hook sacred cow, the VAST majority of the reactions were the complete opposite. I was stunned at how many people were actually on board. It’s like this post was artificially pumped to gauge the public’s reaction. Not only did most of the comments come from accounts that didn’t follow me, but they overwhelmingly agreed that something actually might be wrong here.

Well, the public was tested, and it seems that a LOT of people are receptive to the idea that we were lied to about Sandy Hook. If it reached an even bigger audience, that revelation could cause a significant and destabilizing chunk of the population to snap out of the Matrix in an instant.

Why did they double down on Sandy Hook? Why was that the ONE issue they chose to weaponize against “controversial” figures like Alex Jones? When viewed as a false flag, it could be that we’re dealing with one of the largest and most ambitious staged events in modern history. But it also occurred at the end of an era. In 2012/13, everything changed. Smartphones and instant access to the web connected us in a way that forced these live drills to evolve. Subsequent mass casualty events in places like Las Vegas and Uvalde are further examples of highly manipulated happenings, but they followed different scripts.

When viewing Sandy Hook as an extravagant grand finale of a bygone time, it also can be seen as an announcement of the next era of deceit. And yet its very ambition may have made it more vulnerable to exposure as being engineered, at least in part. Is that why the subject has become so emotionally (and legally) charged? Does it have little to do with protecting the legacy of “dead kids” and everything to do with a transparent attempt to dissuade rational people from considering that we’ve been lied to even about something as “untouchable” as Sandy Hook?

This may be the most important event in the last 20 years. Can it unravel even more decades of deception? Although the US government had long been employing propaganda and false flags against its population, in mid-2012 the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act officially allowed it to engage in "information and psychological operations" within the United States.

In the early 1990s, William Cooper warned that staged school shootings as “false flags” would soon be used in the US as psyops. In the aftermath of these highly emotionally-charged events, the public can slowly be swayed into relinquishing key rights. Cooper argued that the 2nd Amendment in particular was one of the single greatest impediments preventing the establishment of the New World Order. If you want to take over a country, a heavily armed population is not ideal.

Cooper’s warning turned prophetic after the Columbine shooting in 1999. Even that story is highly suspect, including many accounts of more than the official two shooters. In the time before ubiquitous smart phones and constant access to social media, it was easier to stage mass casualty events and pass them off as something else.

In 2012, I was well-versed with the research of Bill Cooper and staged school shootings. With all the hubbub surrounding the December 2012 “end” to the Mayan calendar, I was on the alert for a significant false flag instead. A book I was reading on occult rituals had predicted a false flag around Christmas 2012, so I took that prediction further and deduced a likely candidate would be 11 days *before* Christmas, since 11 is the number of magical rituals (according to Aleister Crowley).

On December 14, 2012, when news flooded in about a school shooting, I immediately suspected we were dealing with some sort of staged event. Many signs were immediately apparent that this was the case. A number of researchers have since produced a copious amount of documentaries and other exposés, so summarizing the extent of this evidence is outside the scope of this analysis. After all, we have to focus on a handful of BIG discrepancies to get the attention of the masses, and not overwhelm them with excessive data points.

Of all the inconsistencies swirling around this other-worldly event, perhaps the most jarring on its face is the footage of Sandy Hook parent Robbie Parker. Within hours of the alleged loss of his daughter Emilie, he was filmed smiling and laughing before “getting into character” by assuming a “grieving” disposition just in time for a live TV interview.

The footage of Robbie understandably went viral, particularly in the conspiracy research community. This was not the demeanor of a man who had just lost a child, at least to anyone with eyes to see. But it was far from “proof” of anything. The debunkers used it to double down, insisting (correctly, to be fair) that everyone has a different grieving process. While suspicious af, it wasn’t a hill to die on, and it certainly wasn’t proof of anything. But it made an indelible impression on everyone who watched it, even the skeptics.

That’s part of the reason why this picture is key. The Parker family has been elemental as a weapon in the persecution of those questioning the official story of Sandy Hook. But ask yourself: isn’t footage of a man clearly laughing and joking mere hours after allegedly losing his daughter worthy of further examination, particularly in light of an “official” family photo being suspiciously doctored?

Here’s where it gets extra spicy. The community notes on this thread started spazzing out. It was delightful and delicious to watch in real time. It should be noted that my original post was (inadvertently) quite clever for a viral thread. I made NO claims other than providing an image and a statement that Sandy Hook should be revisited. This presented quite the quandary for the snotty middleschoolers that have been weaponizing community notes. A Sandy Hook conspiracy thread was going viral, how could they “debunk” it? Their efforts ended up not only confirming my suspicions, but they even provided further elucidation!

I’ve never had a community note before. I was actually quite surprised by this. But I knew it was coming on this thread because it was being seen by more people than anything I had ever posted before. After more than six thousand likes and almost a million views, I was gifted my first community note, and it didn’t disappoint.

There were two “notes” on the debunk. The first stated that “AI image detectors are incredibly unreliable and often highly random and speculative.” As expected, the note doth protested too much. My post had nothing to do with the veracity of AI image detectors. The second was even more adorable. It read: “Sandy Hook really happened. Alex Jones, know (sic) prominently for pushing the Sandy Hook conspiracy theory, even admits to this.” Hilarious typo aside, the emotional appeal of “it super-duper happened” was inherently discrediting, especially considering that my original thread said nothing about it “not happening” and ONLY suggested it needed to be revisited.

I’ll admit I was disappointed by this note. I had been anticipating my community note cherry being popped for a while, but this effort was underwhelming. It was even more sophomoric than I’d envisioned. The best part was how it used Alex Jones of all people as a source, the irony of which was palpable.

The first lame note was soon replaced by another, which actually ended up being extremely revealing. It mentioned how “available commercial AI image detectors” have a 25% false positive rate. Again, this wasn’t really relevant because my original post had nothing to do with the accuracy level of AI image detectors. The one I used even showed that the picture had a chance (albeit small) of being real.

But the final “debunk” was way more intriguing. It read (citing Wikipedia): “Most importantly the Sandy Hook shooting predates capable generative image models by many years.” Did this note inadvertently let the cat out of the bag? Think about the wording here. It claimed that because certain technologies weren’t released to the public in 2012, this image couldn’t have been artificially generated. But what if it was made with tech that WASN’T officially released to the public? Or what if it was made with “available tech” by someone highly skilled (certainly not the mom)? Is this why they never tried to claim that the picture was photoshopped by a family member, like some of the others? Could the tech used to create it be connected to those who were deceptively crafting the larger narrative?

Interestingly, this second community note was soon replaced with the first one AGAIN and there appeared to be a brief tug-of-war between the two. The debunkers were desperate to get my thread noted (and therefore demonetized, which they stated was their goal because they wanted to punish “Sandy Hook denial." Pay attention to words like “denial” because they are often abused by bullies clinging to false realities). The next morning the note was still there, so I initiated the formal appeal process to have it removed for irrelevancy. To my legitimate surprise, a few hours later it was gone and never came back.

This was an important moment and an actual victory (for once)! In the wake of Sandy Hook, the chorus of debunkers shouted how conspiracy theorists were wrong for claiming it was staged to take away gun rights. Was this a deflection from the notion that Sandy Hook was engineered as an attack on free speech instead? You don’t have to look further than how the full weight of the establishment juggernaut was brought down on someone like Alex Jones, who had never even made Sandy Hook a big part of his research and conspiratorial persona. This was done not necessarily to destroy Alex, but as a warning to everyone else to not challenge the status quo. The emotional trauma inherent in these tragedies makes rational discourse just about impossible, and Big Tech in unison with Big Brother uses staged rituals like Sandy Hook to silence anyone who flies too close to the sun.

As our collective understanding of the deceptions of our world grows, and as our technology improves to the point where it becomes possible to seriously reexamine "confirmed history” under a new lens, it’s now more important than ever to reexamine the “taboo” happenings of recent memory. Sandy Hook is near the top of that list. No historical event is immune from further investigation and scrutiny, no matter how heinous or insensitive you might think it is to question the official narratives.

If we were lied to about Sandy Hook, will more fraudulent fairy tales and false flags like COVID, 9/11 and JFK be next, like a domino effect of unraveling conspiracies?

Until then...wtf is up with this picture?

Answer this and the rest will follow.

https://twitter.com/foundring1/status/1783868443466588162

This song was inspired by my neighbor (who I was named after).
He was killed serving in Iraq in 2003.
The antiwar message speaks for itself.
This was my 3rd video on YouTube.
There's a Big Tech "blacklist" for artists. This is the moment I made the list.
YouTube was *much* smaller then. New artists were easier to categorize and promote/suppress.
After the '08 financial crisis, I wrote a song about that too. Since that time, I've never been promoted organically by YouTube. It's like they flipped a switch.