1/ @megbasham , your vehement critique of Tim Keller’s "winsomeness" as merely a contemporary compromise with the "woke left"—a sentiment powerfully articulated in your June 2, 2025, X post—is not only incomplete; it represents a profound historical and ethical myopia. 2/It deliberately ignores, or perhaps conveniently overlooks, a far more deeply entrenched and historically pernicious phenomenon: the "winsome right."

An overlay of the 1984 teachings of @johnmacarthuron cumulative guilt and collective accountability as revealed through scripture in the filling of the cup of the fathers and the pouring out of the same on future generations, as they repeat, without repentance, the evil as good the collective of fathers who had governed in such over centuries.

Far too often Christians will give the false characterization of evil as being relevant for only that generation and that time where it was most explicitly pronounced. This ignores the longer view of implications scripture and Jesus conveys when recounting the range of time that Israel propagated normative evil in oppressing the poor and righteous among them and in rejecting Him. It also obscures the cumulative certainty spelled out by Jesus, in scripture, where the repetition without repentance impacts and implicates the progeny centuries after.

This was a pattern that they repeated for centuries, before Jesus finally declares that their intergenerational cumulative sins had filled the cup of their fathers and it would then break upon them. In the sermon by MacArthur, "Jesus' Last Words to Israel, 1984, this is expertly and theologically laid out for all. Lastly, this culpability is compounded, just as it was for the latter generations of Israel, by even greater revelation, greater light, better clarity of the truth of scripture, for the reformers, puritans, colonial settlers, American founders, Church fathers (Europe and North America):

Unrepentence (An unrepentant person knows that he or she has sinned and refuses to ask God for forgiveness or turn away from the sin. The unrepentant show no remorse for their wrongdoing and don’t feel the need to change. Unrepentance is the sin of willfully remaining sinful.) Inadequate &/or disingenuous repudiation of the style of living sin

Hypocrisy: (doing to others, even among them, what the Lord had times gone by, chastened or punished other for doing to them ; Egypt oppressing them as a poor people, the Israel oppressing the poor among them; assaulting & killing the righteous Jew and Israel doing the same to the righteous among them)

Knowing: having fuller light and revelation than their progenitors with each passing generation. This greater knowledge of what Jesus deems good and his regard for the righteous and the poor. Having this more that the prior generation, yet still declaring their faith as ardent while a life witness that testifies to the contrary.

Repetition: repeating the error of the collective of fathers who governed in evil as good in doing each of these. Here Macarthur covers each as it was reflected in scripture in the response of Jesus to this full cup of intergenerational error and their corporate accountability. Jesus' Last Words to Israel -

Analyzing MacArthur's Sermon and the Legacy of Racial Injustice

Introduction John MacArthur's sermon on Matthew 23 provides a powerful analysis of the doctrine of cumulative guilt and intergenerational accountability. When applied to the context of North America's history with racial injustice, this sermon becomes even more poignant. This analysis will delve into how MacArthur's insights can illuminate the cumulative guilt and collective accountability of those who, under the guise of Christianity, perpetuated racial doctrines and practices.

The Impact of Increased Knowledge Enlightenment and Abolition: Figures like McLeod and Spurgeon, with increased biblical knowledge, argued against slavery. McLeod, in his work "Negro Slavery Unjustifiable," used scripture to argue that slavery was against Christian principles. Spurgeon, while not directly addressing infant slavery, preached against all forms of slavery, emphasizing human equality before God.

Modern Knowledge: Today, with greater historical and sociological understanding, there's no excuse for ignorance. Yet, the persistence of racial disparities indicates a failure to apply this knowledge towards justice.

The Doctrine of Innate African Inferiority

A central theme in the historical justification of racial injustice in North America was the doctrine of innate African inferiority. This belief, often rooted in biblical misinterpretations like the Curse of Ham, asserted that black people were inherently inferior to white people. This doctrine provided a theological justification for slavery, segregation, and other discriminatory practices.

Implications of Partiality Along Racial Lines

The doctrine of innate African inferiority had profound implications for the treatment of African people. It justified their enslavement, dehumanization, and the denial of basic human rights. This led to a systemic oppression that extended across generations.

The Doctrine of Innate African Inferiority Biblical Misinterpretation: The doctrine of African inferiority was often justified by misinterpreting biblical texts, such as the Curse of Ham (Genesis 9:20-27), to suggest that black people were cursed to servitude. This was not only a theological error but a deliberate misrepresentation to support slavery and later segregation.

Theological Justification for Injustice: This doctrine allowed for the dehumanization of Africans, making it easier to treat them as property rather than neighbors deserving love. This theological justification was crucial in creating a societal norm where racial superiority was not just accepted but preached.

Historical Context and Collective Guilt MacArthur's reference to the "measure of your fathers" touches on a theological concept where the sins of the past generations accumulate, leading to a collective judgment. This isn't merely about personal sin but about a systemic, generational rejection of God's truth, which has been perpetuated through time.

Israel's History: From the Old Testament, we see cycles of faithfulness and apostasy. Prophets were often killed or ignored, reflecting a pattern of rejecting God's messengers. This pattern didn't end with the Old Testament but continued into the New Testament era with the rejection of Jesus.

British Monarchy and Colonial Settlers: Extending this concept, one could argue that similar patterns of rejecting divine guidance or justice have occurred in other historical contexts. The British monarchy, especially during times of religious turmoil (e.g., Henry VIII's break from Rome), and colonial settlers in America often mixed political power with religious authority, sometimes leading to actions contrary to Christian ethics (e.g., treatment of indigenous peoples, slavery).

American Founders and Church Fathers:
The founding of America, while rooted the quest for religious freedom, also saw compromises with Christian principles, particularly in the acceptance of slavery and the displacement of native populations. Church fathers, while spreading the Gospel, sometimes aligned too closely with political powers, leading to a dilution or misrepresentation of Christian teachings.

Implications of Partiality Along Racial Lines Infant Africans as Property: The notion that infant Africans could be owned as property directly violated Jesus's teachings on the sanctity of life and the inherent worth of every individual. This practice severed the most fundamental human connections, treating human beings as commodities.

Jim Crow Laws: Post-slavery laws like Jim Crow were enacted, which, while not directly enslaving, continued the systemic oppression by enforcing segregation and denying African Americans basic rights, further deepening the racial divide.
Stealing Connections: The systemic removal of Africans from their familial, cultural, and communal connections was a form of spiritual and psychological violence, directly opposing the Christian principle of community and love for one's neighbor.

Theological Implications Cumulative Guilt: The idea that each generation adds to the "cup of wrath" suggests that societal sins are not just individual but collective. This collective guilt isn't about personal salvation but about the state of a nation or group before God. Judgment and Redemption: While judgment is pronounced, there's always an underlying call for repentance and redemption. Jesus's lament over Jerusalem in Matthew 23:37 ("How often I wanted to gather your children together...") shows His desire for reconciliation, not just condemnation.

Leadership Responsibility: MacArthur highlights the Pharisees' role in leading the people astray. This extends to any leadership, secular or religious, that misguides people away from truth and justice. Leaders bear a heavier responsibility due to their influence. Cumulative Guilt and Collective Accountability The concept of cumulative guilt, as outlined by MacArthur, is particularly relevant to the context of racial injustice. The sins of previous generations, such as the enslavement of Africans and the subsequent enforcement of Jim Crow laws, normative slander of the infant African in church and state have had lasting consequences for current generations (what others were told of the African and what the African was taught of himself). This highlights the importance of collective accountability, recognizing that the actions of individuals and institutions can have far-reaching effects.

The Nature of Cumulative Guilt Cumulative guilt, as discussed, is not merely about the sum of individual sins but about a collective moral debt that grows over time. This concept can be applied to societal sins like racism, where each generation inherits and potentially exacerbates the injustices of the past.

Historical Context: In North America, from the colonial era through the 19th century, the doctrine of African inferiority was not just a belief but a systemic practice, deeply embedded in law, culture, and religion. This doctrine directly contributed to the cumulative guilt of society.
Generational Sin: Just as the Israelites were held accountable for the sins of their fathers, so too are the descendants of those who perpetuated racial injustice in America. The cumulative effect of these sins has created a legacy of systemic racism that persists today.

Church Fathers and Leaders: Many church leaders, through silence or active support, contributed to this racial hierarchy. Their failure to challenge these injustices or to reinterpret scripture in light of justice and equality added to the cumulative guilt.

Political and Social Leaders: From colonial settlers to American founders, many of whom were professing Christians, their laws and policies often reflected this racial bias, embedding it into the fabric of society.

The Role of the Church
The Christian Church played a significant role in perpetuating racial injustice. Many church leaders, through silence or active support, contributed to the doctrine of innate African inferiority. This theological justification provided a moral framework for discriminatory practices.

Reconciliation and Healing Reconciliation is another crucial aspect of addressing the legacy of racial injustice. This involves not just interpersonal forgiveness but also systemic changes that promote equality and respect for all. True reconciliation requires a commitment to healing the wounds of the past and building a more just and equitable future.

Conclusion

John MacArthur's exposition on the doctrine of cumulative guilt and intergenerational accountability offers a powerful and thought-provoking analysis of the consequences of sin. By examining the experiences of the Israelites, he provides insights into the cyclical nature of sin and the importance of repentance and obedience. MacArthur's analysis also highlights the enduring impact that our actions can have on future generations.

Israelites' Cumulative Guilt and Intergenerational Accountability:

The Historical Context of Oppression
The Israelites' experiences of oppression spanned millennia. They were enslaved in Egypt for centuries before their exodus under Moses. Upon settling in Canaan, they faced threats from various neighboring nations, including the Philistines and Ammonites. The Roman Empire later imposed its rule over Judea, resulting in further oppression and persecution.

The Cycle of Oppression and Sin

Despite experiencing centuries of oppression, the Israelites often replicated the very injustices they had suffered. They oppressed the poor among themselves, killed the righteous, and engaged in other sinful behaviors. This cycle of oppression and sin is a recurring theme throughout the biblical narrative.

God as Defender of the Righteous God is consistently portrayed in the Bible as a defender of the righteous, including the poor and the oppressed. He responds to their cries for help and intervenes on their behalf. When the Israelites sinned against their fellow Israelites, especially the vulnerable, they were violating God's principles and inviting His judgment. Scripture shows us that children (all Children are the Lord's). That He declares them innocent before him. Thus millions of infant Africans injured intentionally on the basis of race, over 5+ centuries, in a society governed by christians, were exactly that. Jesus and the infant African formed in His image were the righteous and poor professing Christians systemically and normatively denied neighbor (1400'2-1990's)

The Role of Jesus Jesus' ministry took place during the Roman occupation of Judea. For approximately three years, He offered protection and salvation to the Israelites. His teachings emphasized compassion, justice, and love for one's neighbor. However, the Israelites' rejection of Jesus and their continued sin eventually led to the end of His protection.

The Cup of Their Fathers
The "cup of their fathers" is a metaphor for the accumulated sins of the Israelites over many generations. This cup was filled to overflowing, signifying the fullness of their guilt and the impending judgment. The precise timeline is not explicitly stated in the Bible, but it is clear that the Israelites' sins had been accumulating for centuries. John MacArthur's sermon, when contextualized within North America's racial history, serves as a powerful critique of the doctrine of innate African inferiority and the systemic racism it perpetuated. It highlights the concept of cumulative guilt and the importance of collective accountability in addressing historical injustices. By calling for repentance, restitution, and reconciliation, MacArthur offers a path towards healing and a more just society.

SERMON EXCERPT- Jesus' Last Words to Israel, Part 1 Sermons Matthew 23:34–36 2364 Apr 1, 1984 - MacArthur :

"So the final answer of the religious leaders of Israel, which represents the mass of people, is we reject Jesus Christ and we refuse His message. And He says, “All right, fill it up. Fill it up. And just to be sure you do, I’m going to send more preachers and more teachers and more writers, and you’re going to fill it up by killing them, and the ones you can’t kill, you’re going to persecute. And then you’re going to fill that cup up so much that upon you” - verse 35 says - “is going to come all the righteous blood shed on the earth.” The whole thing is going to come apart. The dam is going to take only so much and it’s going to break on you. The cup of wrath will be filled. The word hopōs - hopōs - the beginning of verse 35 - hopōs means purpose, for the purpose that upon you may come the righteous blood shed. God’s purpose is to let this generation fill up the final act of atrocity against the righteous by massacring the Savior Himself and His followers, and then God’s judgment will pour itself out. It isn’t that God wills that men be lost.

God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. It is, however, that when men reject the Lord Jesus Christ and refuse to come to Him, it is when they do that, they bring upon themselves an outpouring of God’s wrath. And listen carefully to me. The longer they have rejected and the more information they have that they have rejected, and the more lessons given them from which they have not learned, the greater the guilt. You understand that? So that the people in Jesus’ time have greater guilt than anyone that ever lived before them. You say, “Well, their forefathers had the law of God.” Yes, but they had the law of God and the Messiah. They had the teaching of the Old Testament prophets and John the Baptist and Jesus and His apostles.

And not only that, they should have learned of God’s judgment on past apostates and past murderers of the righteous. They should have learned from them not to do that. So they had accumulated revelation and they had accumulated lessons from history, all of which they rejected. Therefore, their accumulative guilt is surpassing that of any generation prior to them. And so it all breaks on their heads. How can one generation be held responsible for all the righteous blood? Because of its constant rejection of full light, constant rejection of all the lessons of history.

I mean, we can see it in this covenant people clearly. I hope we can see it as clearly in our own nation because we are in the very process right now of filling up the cup of God’s wrath. And we’ve been doing it steadily. And this generation alive today is more guilty of doing it than any in the past because we have the accumulated testimony of God’s truth in this culture and we also have the accumulated lessons of why we should not act against a holy God. And the more we accumulate that data, the more guilty we become. And when it breaks, it’ll break on the generation that finally fills the cup to the brim. ...

And one generation which duplicates the sins of past generations and rejects the lessons of past history and rejects the revelation of God that it has brings upon itself a more profound judgment. So judgment is cumulative. And He says this to them, verse 35, this is a fascinating verse. It’s going to break on you all the righteous blood - that is all the blood shed when righteous people were killed.

When they persecuted righteous people and took their life, which, of course, is the greatest indicator of the rejection of God’s truth. I mean when you kill the righteous, you’ve gone the limit, right? That’s the worst you can do. So all of the worst of your evil manifest in the killing of righteous people, shedding their blood, it’s all going to come to fill the cup and break on you. And you’re going to be suffering the just punishment of all that blood from righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, son of Barachiah, whom you slew between the temple and the altar. From A to Z, from the beginning of the Old Testament, Genesis chapter 4, the first murder of a righteous man, who killed who? Cain killed - why did he kill Abel? Because he couldn’t stand a righteous man, right? He couldn’t stand him." .... "Don’t be shocked, they tried to killed Paul there. Read Acts 21. That may have been a place where they killed a lot of righteous people because that’s where the focus came clear, you see. You have unrighteous people running the place, and you have a righteous person who confronts them, that would be the place where they might kill. Think of the life of Christ. How many times did He go into the temple when they would have wanted to kill Him if they could have? So we’re not surprised by that. So I don’t believe Jesus made a mistake. I don’t believe He could. I’m not going to second-guess Him. I believe this takes us from Abel to Zechariah, the son of Barachiah, and Jesus is telling us that He, too, died a martyr like so many others because He spoke the truth of God. You slew him. Would you notice that when He says “whom you slew,” some of them would have said, “Wait a minute, we weren’t there. We didn’t do that.” But He sees the nation as one guilty nation, cumulatively filling up the cup through many generations, and the guilt of rejection and rebellion is increased by that accumulation of previous warnings, that accumulation of previous messages and preachings from the prophets and writings from the scribes.

They had so much information, they had so much knowledge, they were filling up the same cup to its brim. So the bloody flow of murdered martyrs from Abel to Zechariah, He says you’re guilty of it all. And I see you as one with your whole nation. You are guilty, as guilty as Cain. You are guilty, as guilty as those who slew Zechariah and everybody in between those two. You’ve accumulated all that guilt. What’s going to happen? Verse 36. We’ll stop with this verse. “Truly I say to you all these things shall come upon this generation.” All these things. All what things? All this guilt. All this guilt for righteous blood is going to break on your heads. It’s like in Revelation 17 when John sees the vision of the final world false church, you know the harlot, Mystery Babylon, the great prostitute, the false religious system of the tribulation time? And John says she was drunk with the blood of all the martyrs. It’s as if that false system, too, accumulates the guilt of all the slaying of the righteous there. So he says you’re guilty of it all, and because you are guilty of it all, the guilt is going to come down on top of you. It’s all going to break on you. This generation. What’s He mean? I think He meant the people right there. This generation. This Jewish group of people. This nation at this time and this place in history, you fill the cup up when you kill the Savior and His apostles. You’ve filled it up, that’s it. And God says, through Christ, it’s going to break on you. And it did, by the way. It did. The Lord was crucified as we shall see a few days later. And it wasn’t but a few years after that in, 70 A.D., that the judgment of God came, and that judgment physically that came in 70 A.D. against the nation Israel was only a symbol of the eternal damnation that came against those Christ rejecters.".... "We saw there that God says because you have rejected the Messiah, because you have filled up the cup of sin and guilt, because you’ve not only rejected the Messiah but all the prophets of the past, you have cumulatively rejected all of God’s revelation. You have all the Old Testament in front of you. You have all the preaching of John the Baptist. You have all the ministry of Jesus Christ. You’ve rejected it all. You’ve filled the cup, in verse 32, that’s the image there. You have filled the cup of wrath to the brim. This is it. And the cup that it took centuries to fill is going to take centuries equally to pour back out. They filled it up with centuries of sin; it’s being poured out with centuries of chastening. You say, “Well, how could this group of people be guilty of the sins of the past?” Because they knew the sins of the past and didn’t learn from them, they inherited their guilt. Because they not only didn’t listen to Jesus and the apostles, they didn’t listen to John before Jesus and the prophets before John. They accumulated the guilt of all of it because they followed in the sins of their fathers, never learning lessons their fathers’ pain and deprivation and punishment should have taught them. So they had a cumulative guilt.

They had rejected full light, full revelation. They had come so far as, in the words of Hebrews 6, to be exposed to the whole of the gospel, tasting the heavenly gift, being partakers of the Holy Spirit’s power and of the things of the age to come. In other words, they had a full revelation of Christ, and they rejected and said He was from Satan, He was from hell, He was from the pit. And they, therefore, became the apostates of all apostates, rejecting the accumulation of all revelation to them, which was summarized, epitomized, and maximized in the coming of Jesus Christ. So He says because of this, verse 36, all these things are going to come on this generation. This is the most guilty generation in the history of Israel because it rejected the light that had accumulated through thousands of years of divine revelation. And it’s all going to come on you."

@megbasham @ostrachan @DianeLangberg
@kkdumez @LizzieMarbach @RobertKennedyJr
@JDVance @kangminjlee @NeilShenvi @GavinNewsom @SusanNewson3 @Pastor_Gabe
@KamalaHarris @calvinrobinson @RealCandaceO
@pastordmack @WhitlockJason @JohnPiper
@DavidAFrench @VoddieBaucham @MattWalshBlog
@DustyDeevers @joe_rigney @ByronDonalds
@MichaelSteele @johnmacarthur @drtonyevans
@SpeakerJohnson @between2worlds @ScottAniol
@drmoore @ThomasSowell @RealDianeYap
@WarrenColeSmith @OsGuinness @Franklin_Graham
@elonmusk @TheRabbitHole84 @AnnCoulter
@ScottAdamsSays @jdgreear @BethMooreLPM
@pastoremase @LigonDuncan @KayColesJames
@Eric_Conn @jarbitro @tomascol @JoelWBerry


2/The Collective of fathers further explained:

https://x.com/guyschultz/status/1832958991841755503

This is actually completely false. The vast majority of white doctors have been afforded far more artificial advantages than any minority. It has to do with generational 100% white affirmative action. The barrier to entry into nearly every profession in America through the 1990’s was relatively zero for whites in comparison to blacks.

This ethic of HIE ( homogeneity inequity and exclusion) persisted for 5+ centuries in Europe & North America, in Church & state.

We can see this best by looking at the overwhelming representation of whites in medical and scientific leadership positions in America in comparison to Asians since the 1700’s. There are nearly no Asian medical school deans or heads of medical associations over that same period despite outperforming Whites in GPA & standardized exams . Also the presence of legacy &/or staff & faculty children or referral favored admissions impacts those immensely. Entry by association has been rampant among white students for centuries thru the 2000’s. Also Barriers for groups like African Americans elevated longer than any other on the basis of race.

In addition, entry on the basis of parental or familial financial contributions to programs is far more like for whites as well as paying for testing . These almost exclusively a feature leveraged by whites based on wealth advantage.

This is amplified by networking that has enabled whites to benefit from connections with powerful or wealthy members of the community for mentorships that whites and other minorities are only now able to leverage through the increase integration of minorities into race relations deemed until the 2000’s as disfavored, in particular by doctrines of innate African inferiority propagated by Southern Baptist, Southern Presbyterian, medical racism, scientific racism, Mormons, Catholics & even policing. These along with the faulty Tower of Babel that barred interracial dating, friendships & marriage in places like Liberty University, Bob Jones university , Sbc churches persisted in areas with dense black populations into the 2000’s when both Bob Jones & the SBC officially apologized & renounced them as error.

All of this amounts to 4+ centuries of a collective of fathers who professed a Christian faith governing in evil as good along racial lines. In this evil of the collective of fathers is promised in scripture to be visited upon the children to the 4th generation in the best case scenario & longer,if repeated by the progeny,as it has been for centuries.

As we know, to hold leadership in government through the 1960’s in America, required a Christian faith in most states. Those same individuals often ascended to federal leadership roles. Thus 80% + of Congress & executive branch have been Protestant Christians. Many groomed in biblical error that affirmed innate African inferiority as decreed by necessity by Jesus in perpetuity. These lies established the systemic taking of face of each infant African from 1526-2000’s in nearly every institution in American and European society. It set the compulsory tone of inadequacy & rightly subservient to the lowest white that provided license to erase the white lineage in all with a drop of black blood and set every opportunity to be afforded as furthest out of reach of every black before making any objective assessment of potential or capability in areas of academia. Auto enrollment in the shop track in schools rather than college persisted thru the 1950’s/60’s. My 98 year old cousin , physician with 2,sons who are physicians (both training medical students ;1 as the chief thoracic surgeon at UPenn for over a decade), was placed in such a tract until his parent intervened to say he would pursue medicine. These are rudimentary systemic barriers strictly on the basis of race.

@VirgilWalkerOMA not being dealt with in kind is a failure. It may be because he has a fraction of the visibility of @rightresponsem & the audience of evangelical speech is vastly non-black
2/More on this. 100% white affirmative action continued.

The claim that African Americans have received undue advantages is intellectually dishonest and evades the far greater extent of 100% white affirmative action. For centuries, white doctors have benefited from artificial advantages, a result of generational privilege. The barrier to entry in various professions was significantly lower for whites than blacks until the 1990s, exemplifying the ethic of Homogeneity, Inequity, and Exclusion (HIE).

In Asian cultures, 'face' refers to social standing and reputation. In North America, the systemic denial of opportunities to African Americans has resulted in the taking of 'face' from entire communities for over four centuries. This has been perpetuated through practices like auto-enrollment in trade or military pathways of learning for black students until the 1980s, limiting their potential.

The overwhelming representation of whites in medical and scientific leadership positions, despite Asians outperforming whites in GPA, SAT, MCAT (especially STEM components), and other metrics for decades, is a testament to this systemic injustice. The absence of Asian department heads in STEM education and research further highlights HIE.

Legacy admissions, staff and faculty connections, and financial contributions have further solidified white dominance. These advantages have been leveraged by whites for centuries, while African Americans have faced significant barriers based solely on race, perpetuating HIE.

Doctrines like the Curse of Ham, Curse of Canaan, Tower of Babel, and Mark of Cain have been central to the Southern Baptist, Mormon, Southern Presbyterian, and Catholic Church's perpetuation of innate African inferiority. Hypodescent has erased white lineage in African Americans, while scientific racism has deemed them cognitively deficient and incapable of white achievement levels and leadership.

Theories such as Social Darwinism, Eugenics, and Phrenology have also been used to justify racial hierarchy and discrimination.

In summary, the combination of 100% white affirmative action, HIE, & intergenerational African inferiority has resulted in systemic barriers that have limited the potential of African Americans for centuries. The practice of assigning black students to trade or military pathways of learning in grade school, rather than college preparatory courses, persisted until the 1980s, exemplifying HIE. Biblical doctrines illegitimately used to cement innate African inferiority include the Curse of Ham and the Tower of Babel. Those who profess to be Christians yet protect and encourage the ascription of honor, virtue, and godliness to white men who professed a Christian faith and unrepentantly kept or enabled the keeping of millions of kidnapped infant Africans as property and breeding them for more, minimize or dismiss the evil of doing such & perpetuate an ethic of innate African inferiority into the future. This is akin to setting evil as inconsequential, while deeming those who minimize the Holocaust or affirm Nazi ideology accomplices to the evil carried out by Hitler & his regime.

The perpetuation of HIE, intergenerational African inferiority, & 100% white affirmative action has resulted in a society where African Americans are systemically denied opportunities, & their potential is limited. The absence of Asian representation in leadership positions, despite their superior performance in metrics, further highlights this injustice. The use of biblical doctrines to cement innate African inferiority has been a central tenet of European and North American society, perpetuating an ethic of exclusion & discrimination. It is essential to acknowledge & address these systemic barriers to create a more equitable society. @pastordmack @johnmacarthur @JustinPetersMin @megbasham @tomascol @drantbradley @TheLeoTerrell @eji_org @AttorneyCrump @Yale @Harvard @PennMEHP @elonmusk @ScottAdamsSays @JSamuelsEEOC @andrealucasEEOC

1a/@elonmusk @TheRabbitHole84 @TuckerCarlson @johnmacarthur @pastoremase @drmoore @MichaelHorton_ @douglaswils @ProfGeorgeYancy @DavidAFrench @BillGates @BillAckman @JSamuelsEEOC @ConceptualJames @HPluckrose @jordanbpeterson the “Woke mind virus” Fallacy -historical e-reveal

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1780641693253169230

1b/This reveals why the very Universities that were instrumental in telling exponentially more of their history in Innate African inferiority ideology,have been targets of efforts to discredit them. In doing so,the aim is to distance them from America & veracity. @realchrisrufo

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1744575997012267124

@Hebro_Steele What this misses is that the systemic innate African inferiority most progeny of kidnapped infant Africans face is fruit of 4+ centuries of the largest denominations in the nation licensing such w/ illegitimate use of scripture. Dei is flawed as have been All other approaches 1

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1745794195007185145

@Hebro_Steele @ThabitiAnyabwil @SpeakerJohnson @newtgingrich @KayColesJames @MichaelSteele @bariweiss @pastordmack @ShaiLinne @ProfGeorgeYancy before children leave grade school,they are taught whose past is glorious & worthy of learning & whose is to be minimized & glossed over. Too that those men of virtue,who are their Hitlers,are godly despite unrepentantly slandering God & all Africans & keeping them as property 2/

@conservmillen Why 2020? There’re examples of social Justice engagement that equal/rival these by @ConceptualJames @albertmohler @realDonaldTrump @johnmacarthur @tomascol @DennisPrager @RealCandaceO @SenTedCruz @D_B_Harrison @bariweiss @SpeakerJohnson @larryelder @benshapiro from years earlier1

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1619067992888999936

@conservmillen @ConceptualJames @albertmohler @realDonaldTrump @johnmacarthur @tomascol @DennisPrager @RealCandaceO @SenTedCruz @D_B_Harrison @bariweiss @SpeakerJohnson @larryelder @benshapiro @conservmillen & evangelicals what is actually more striking are those who were silent up until 2020 in addressing what scripture assures us would be visited upon the children to the 4th Gen of a collective of fathers that govern in evil- the Church in innate African inferiority2

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1708449151988416646

1/@ThomasSowell It's interesting that Sowell
consistently begins from the
perspective of a deficiency in any
who pursue justice. It is in fact the
opposite, those who plays
Calhoun's name had a very low
view of integrity and virtue. @KayColesJames @CPAC 2/In fact
they were so desperate to exalt
someone that they chose a man
with such Vice. Sowell fashions himself as one who gets the mind of those in history. Yet he ignores the immutable standard of God they all were subject to.

1/Since segregation,Jim Crow & the black codes were licensed by followers of Jesus,aren’t they exponentially worse than the 9/11 attacks? @9Marks @SteveDeaceShow @VoddieBaucham @roddreher @tomascol @DavidAFrench @JohnPiper @albertmohler @johnmacarthur @pastordmack @drtonyevans 2/For evil affirmed as good by those who represent Jesus, over centuries grooms society to believe a false Jesus. @9Marks @SteveDeaceShow @VoddieBaucham @roddreher @tomascol @DavidAFrench @JohnPiper @albertmohler @johnmacarthur @pastordmack @drtonyevans @ostrachan

1/The very clear timing of calling this out while so many evangelicals celebrate & even affirm the virtue & Christianity of Queen Elizabeth III should not be missed. Racism & Abortion. @pastoremase @ShaiLinne @roddreher @VoddieBaucham @DavidAFrench @ThabitiAnyabwil @tomascol @TGC

https://twitter.com/pastordmack/status/1568553180123828227

2/The evil she allowed exceeds American abortion law. As Sovereign,has she used 70 years of Royal assent to stop it? @KayColesJames @pastordmack @ShaiLinne @JohnPiper @profyancey @DerryckGreen @D_B_Harrison @ostrachan @johnmacarthur @VoddieBaucham @RevKevDeYoung @timkellernyc

@scott_m_coley A deeper dive into “men of their times” this effectively is a systemic/structural application of grace ascribed to centuries of lying on Jesus by the Church. A time-adjusted assessment of the Holiness of Jesus in relations to the masses. @pastordmack @DavidAFrench 1/ @scott_m_coley @pastordmack @DavidAFrench The implications are systemic grace/innocence is declarable where it comes to owning kidnapped Africans & deeming them innately inferior unrepentantly. @albertmohler @johnmacarthur @tomascol @VoddieBaucham @DrStevenJLawson @SkyeJethani @DavidAFrench @KayColesJames @JohnPiper 2/

1/“Lionize: give a lot of public attention & approval to (someone);treat as a celebrity.”

John Owen
Johnathan Edwards
George Whitfield
Elias Boudinot
Benjamin Rush
James Henley Thornwell
Robert E Lee
Henry Lewis Dabney
Bob Jones
James P. Boyce 2/..Basil Manly Jr. William Williams
When we lionize figures of the past without accounting for their unrepentant failings then proceed to marginalize other figures of the past largely on the basis of the failings,where is the justice in that?This has been the mode of operation..

@davidwblight1 why aren’t the concepts of liberal & conservative applied beyond the abolition period in historical analysis? We don’t get a clear indication of left or right.Predates the concept,but not the real life presence of the @JemarTisby @woodyholtonusc @KevinMKruse Is this accurate? What would the Church have been ? How about founders?

@DerryckGreen Not at all. I disagree with the any number of issues on either side. I’ve split my vote in nearly every election. Voting mostly Republican prior to McCain and Trump. It was then where the white church jettisoned character and social concerns as central to platform. @DerryckGreen Ok with McCain Budweiser connection, Trump episcopal same sex, gambling and abortion position. Also, the resistance to female head of state shifted with the Palin push. So , those things set aside by the @GOP made this not the same GOP.

1/It is important to consider the full history and assess the guidance the Church provided in the way of the impending damage to the witness of Jesus in a 2016 Trump election. @D_B_Harrison @DerryckGreen @JoshBuice @EWErickson @marklevinshow @9Marks @SteveDeaceShow @tomascol 2/Continued- impending damage to the witness of Jesus in a 2016 Trump election election. @D_B_Harrison @DerryckGreen @JoshBuice @EWErickson @marklevinshow @9Marks @SteveDeaceShow @tomascol @ostrachan @johnmacarthur @hwseleutheroi @tombuck @VoddieBaucham

@ThomasSowell this is not a meaningful analysis. Merely hypotheticals. Why not state the economics of an immoral while lawful commerce. @NRO @KayColesJames @ShaiLinne @FoundersMin @VoddieBaucham @tomascol @DavidAFrench capitalismmagazine.com/2005/02/bedroo… 2/This is sex work & it is not morally neutral, neither is economics. It is exactly why some alternatives are prohibitive. capitalismmagazine.com/2005/02/bedroo… avoiding a vital input such as ethics/morality is highly incomplete & evasive. @drtonyevans @RealCandaceO @KayColesJames @pastordmack

1/Firing Line w/ Thomas Sowell "The Economic Lot of Minorities" confirmed ... @TheThomasSowell via @YouTube @VoddieBaucham @KayColesJames @pastordmack @Hillsdale @johnmacarthur @benshapiro @DavidAFrench @philvischer @drtonyevans @D_B_Harrison @tomascol 2/Here @TheThomasSowell looks to explain the economic disparities among minorities in America. In referencing that among African-Americans, he acknowledges the mandated dependency of kidnapped enslaved Africans over centuries under American rule. It is called out as a distinction

1/ I guess telling anyone who doesn’t like injustice in America to “shut up, go back to where they came from and fix that country, then come & tell us ho to do it” is not telling Americans looking to make America its best to “shut up or leave.” @SenTomCotton @CPAC @KayColesJames 2/This is @LindseyGrahamSC on Trump as racist and a bigot. This is directly tied to and characteristic of telling Americans from sh*thole countries they are not welcome & deeming their grievances in innately inferior @GraceComChurch @VoddieBaucham @CPAC @Hillsdale @KayColesJames

1/Read it and would never sign it. It is clearly opportunistic and incredibly delayed. Too many involved are complicit in Trump’s massive contributions against some of the core denials in the declaration, yet stood comparatively silent as his administration Advanced error.

https://twitter.com/JoshBuice/status/1565442859020402688

2/As they’ve affirmed the whole Trump, by way of that silence & partnership with a denier of the triune God, youth & a watching world were groomed in the whole Lindsay. These 2 without repentance. How? Lukewarm? @VoddieBaucham @johnmacarthur @ostrachan @D_B_Harrison @DavidAFrench

@ConceptualJames Here is the thing. God's people,long before there was a Marx or a greatgreatgreat grandmomma Marx,were acting against systemic racism/ethnic inferiority in place in antiquity. Pharoah's oppression of the Jews highlights such. 1/ @tomascol @VoddieBaucham @albertmohler @pastordmack @ConceptualJames @tomascol @VoddieBaucham @albertmohler @pastordmack In fact,America has long-equated itself to being a response to systemic injustice & likened its revolt to the Exodus of God's chosen people. The very liberty guarded is one Founders deemed provided divinely from systemic oppression like that of Israel.2/ @tomascol @VoddieBaucham

1/ History is vital because it removes the excuse of ignorance and moral error. Where we evaluate those before us & find departures from Biblical ethics, we are hedged in from proceeding in kind to repeat said errors. them. @pastordmack @tomascol @VoddieBaucham @johnmacarthur 2/The absence of history that presents those errors as the failings the represent, makes way for a renewed embrace of them. @pastordmack @albertmohler @tomascol @VoddieBaucham @johnmacarthur @LigonDuncan @pastoremase @drtonyevans @9Marks @JemarTisby @KevinMKruse @ThomasSKidd @TGC

Individual sin of divorce,devastates a family & in fact,a whole society. So that the more of this particular sin,the greater harm society experiences. Generational impact 1/. @pastoremase @pastordmack @tomascol @JohnPiper @albertmohler @LigonDuncan @DrStevenJLawson @DavidAFrench

https://twitter.com/guyschultz/status/1538149596643328000

Positive individual righteousness of godly marriage,nurtures a family & in fact,a whole society. So that the more of this particular reflection of God,the greater grace a society experiences.2/@pastoremase @pastordmack @tomascol @JohnPiper @albertmohler @LigonDuncan @DavidAFrench