How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/cshperspectives/status/1583053190500864002Administrators don’t want a system where you have to read somebody’s work in order to evaluate them professionally. That would cede power to department colleagues with subject matter expertise. They want to pull the strings themselves
https://twitter.com/GrattonCaterina/status/1521871781065330689Something easy to overlook, though, is that changing the research design often changes the substantive research question. Consider this example of moving from a cross-sectional association to within-person change. This isn't just a change in design, it is a change in estimand 2/
https://twitter.com/devon_cantwell/status/1491105270449467392Oregon banned it after that incident came out. But AFAIK it is still permitted at a federal level oregonlive.com/education/2015…
https://twitter.com/CostelloCK/status/1354502697689481223Substantive upshot: A user's Twitter experience - what they see in their feed - is heavily affected by their decisions of who to follow. Those curation decisions, in the aggregate, are associated with mental health
https://twitter.com/DrBenKatz/status/1337019219624554496
https://twitter.com/JonCaranto/status/1104440858470948864And that’s not even getting into the validity issues with the criterion variables
https://mobile.twitter.com/hardsci/status/1059154782571585536
https://twitter.com/blackgoatpod/status/1047580028215513089This question was posed really well by @NaomiOreskes, who pointed out that even scientists do not have the subject-matter and technical expertise to evaluate all of the science they consume and rely on ted.com/talks/naomi_or…
https://twitter.com/hardsci/status/1039900380769841152