Replying as a QT thread because this take always shocks people: I'm saying that achieving female liberation requires the abolishment of paternal rights as we now know them. Whether or not a man provides care for a child has nothing to do with their status as a rights-holder (1/9)

https://twitter.com/ColdTimidSoul/status/1630286629804883969

over that child. Many women provide care for children they don't have parental rights over. If legal title to the child is the sole reason a man participates in caring for his offspring, he's unfit (and, at risk of spoiling the ending, most of them are unfit). Automatic (2/9)

#YoungGCWomenUnite I’m a 21 year old lesbian and I used to fully believe in the trans cause. One day, I started “hate reading” a radical feminist blog just to see what those “bigots” were saying. I couldn’t stop reading. I went through multiple blogs and devoured as much (1/8) — radical feminist literature as I could get my hands on. To my horror, I agreed with everything they were saying. In comparison to radical feminism, my old liberal feminist (though I wouldn’t have called it such at the time) analysis was surface level drivel. It couldn’t— (2/8)