This is not an argument for/against death penalty. These guys were beyond reform & rehabilitation, and would only be a burden on society if let free, and a burden on the taxpayer if imprisoned for life.
3) Opposed India's right to regulate its own borders and deport illegal immigrants, especially those who have been kicked out of their own country for taking up arms against Myanmar and trying to carve out their own State in Rakhine.
Armenia has declared martial law & mobilised its territorial army after clashes with Azerbaijan.
Here's a clip of an Azeri tank being destroyed, confirmed by both Press Tv and Reuters, but vehemently denied by Azeri authorities.
Some more footage of the clashes in the Nagorno-Karabagh region.
Given Russia has always fully backed Armenia, t will be interesting to see their reaction to the escalation & whether this boils into a Russo-Turkish proxy war that busts the myth of their bilateral "friendship"
You've missed the point, none of this is relevant here.
I'm talking about the future of Indian political discourse getting infiltrated with woke rhetoric as more young people digest English media which is dominated by intersectional crap, not Mahua Moitra's individual career.
When one reads into the historical context of the project to create Brihot Banga (Greater Bengal), they'd know it's much bigger than Mamata's appeasement & that getting control of Assam has always been a central feature of this Islamist project that thrives on Bangla nationalism.
Ironically, it was CPIM leader & incumbent CM Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee who had started ringing the alarm bells during his final tenure He even requested LK Advani for help in containing the Bangla immigration crisis, which he realised was part of a larger demographic project.
Sadly for him, his realisation of what was truly transpiring in West Bengal's Madarsas would spell the end of his political career and the Left's long rule over the State.
His alarmist rhetoric over illegal immigration forced the Islamists & their votes to switch camp to TMC.
~Bridge over river would bring socio-economic development to the region
~Unfriendly country sees potential of bridge
~Country finds out if a certain species in river is endangered
~Finds NGO interested in said species
~Unanimously pays NGO to do drama for endagnered species
~NGO does rona-dhona for species
~NGO files petitions in SC
~Meanwhile, bridge project is stuck in limbo
~Crores of investor money is stuck
~Some investors start pulling out money
The majority of NGOs in today's day & age are pothing but pressure groups for hire that are used to disrupt crucial infrastructure projects in the name of social justice, humanitarianism or environment protection.
Never enjoyed this guy's work.
Not a fan of "progressive" elements in the Indian RW.
Instead of speaking "woke" lingo & validating it, it's time to stop playing by the rules set by Indian liberals, who merely import their rhetoric from the West & apply it in the Indian context.
Woke lingo = the language of Cultural Marxists.
"Institutionalized racism", "Casual sexism" & "White privilege" have been imported from the West & wrongly applied in India's context to solidify concepts like "Systematic Casteism", "Brahmanical Patriarchy" & "Savarna Privilege".
Despite the mountain of evidence that what Sudarshan news was broadcasting was part of an investigative series into a serious case of infiltrationof the civil services, the court has deemed it as "vilification of a community.
It's getting increasingly clear that the West must deal with tyrant Turkey delicately, or risk pushing them into Iran's embrace- a nation with diametrically opposite ambitions in the region- and creating a united Turko-Irani front.
They already pushed Turkey into Russia's trap.
Russia has used Turkey both as a bargaining chip against the West, as well as a fair-weather "agent" to secure its own interests in the region.
Knowing how shrewd Iran's foreign policy makers have been, the same could happen with Turkey in this scenario.
Turkey wants to expand its own influence in the former territories of the erstwhile Ottoman Empire (the crescent from Syria to Libya) and Iran wants to use its proxies to increase influence in previously Saudi-overseen regions (Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen).
The entire article is a conspiracy theory about how the current shoddy state of Europe is a result of Putin's grand master plan.
It may be so, but can you really blame him?
The West had the chance to normalise relations in the 90s, but instead chose to further isolate Russia.
You stole away nations from their sphere of influence, disrespected their interests, created enmity between them and their brothers (Ukraine), ignored China & made Russia the boogeyman, and now you're wondering why Putin wants to destabalise the very people who harmed Russia?🤡
Sorry, but I'll never get on this libertarian/FOE absolutism bandwagon.
I may be what other Hindus call a Carvaka, but if I see someone burning/defiling Hindu symbols & Gods, I'm not going to sit back and watch, let alone encourage it like a moron for furthering the FOE cause.
I fail to understand the obsession some have with this totalitarian level of FOE. I don't care two hoots about being nuanced.
Hs are constantly told we need to sensitize ourselves to other faiths, and we're labelled as thin-skinned when we react to others mocking our faith. Wtf?
Just like secularism, FOE is also a two-way street.
Condescension & mockery towards Hinduism has been so normalised, that we're expected to turn a blind eye to things that would have us beheaded if the tables were turned.
Insult/blatant mockery is not equal to FOE & criticism.