Well, with @delbigtree planning to "fact check" @PeterHotez guest spot of @joerogan ojn this weeks @HighWireTalk, I thought I'd give him some help figuring out What’s Wrong With “Dr. Paul” and his “real world data”
Select talking points to follow: 1/ Dr. Paul Thomas has presented informal data from his clinical observations.
Dr. Graven was used to lend credibility and appearance of independence but has never commented on this publicly, nor provided actual statistics, just a "P=0.05." On the nose. But what stat was used?