𝑰𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝑮𝒖𝒑𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒔 🧵 Before delving further into the topic, let us establish some rules and standards for authority in history debates.
1. Inscriptional evidence supersedes literary evidence.
2. Any claim must be backed by evidence or evidences.
3. Contemporary evidence supersedes non-contemporary claims.

𝘼 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙙 🧵 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙣𝙚𝙬 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙘𝙧𝙞𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙑𝙞𝙥𝙧𝙖 𝙆𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙮𝙖 𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙉𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙖 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙛𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙆𝙖𝙡𝙖𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙞 𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨. In ancient times, King Praśamasiva was born in the city of Mathurā to serve a particular purpose. He was from a Brāhmaṇa family, and his brother was King Rāhula. The king achieved great prosperity and was like a father to his subjects.

𝘼 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝘿𝙪𝙧𝙡𝙖𝙗𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙝𝙖𝙣'𝙨 𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮 : 𝘿𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙢 𝙆𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙝𝙖 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙚? 🧵 Understanding Kashmir's caste dynamics requires examining the occupations and roles associated with different groups. In Kashmir, caste denoting terms often reflected functional or occupational titles, highlighting the significance of profession in shaping social identity.

Fact check:

Let's examine the claim that the Pratiharas were a Kshatriya dynasty and that they were descendants of Lakshmana. I'd like you to carefully consider the information presented in this thread 🧵.

https://twitter.com/yashasvipratap/status/1960712486207848540

To begin with, let's examine Lakshmana's background. As Lord Rama's younger brother, Lakshmana is a significant figure. Yet, a thorough review of scriptures such as the Mahabharata and Ramayana reveals no connection between Lakshmana and the Pratihara dynasty.

A Analysis study of the term Vipra as found in the Ghatiyala inscription

~ Short thread 🧵 📌 There is always a lot of hue and cry regarding the origin of the Pratiharas. Some people start twisting the meaning of the word 'Vipra' — for example, Harichandra is described as the ancestor of the Pratiharas and referred to as a Vipra