As I've explained in part elsewhere (see link), out of law school I went to Big Law (@friedfrank, a place I'm still largely quite fond of), and was largely still presenting as a dude. After the 2016 election, I came out.
He does not sound happy.
Full decision available here:
This brings an end to the district level saga in Pennsylvania. It turns out that nonsense claims with no evidence do not play quite as well in Federal Court as they do on Twitter and on television news.
When you sue a giant number of people and file an (I think) over-length reply brief, this is not the right tone.
OH WHY DID NO ONE EVER THINK OF THIS. If you just *assert* something is irregular, the presumption of irregularity no longer applies! Genius.
(Also, this “Contrary to _____,...” is very weird phraseology.)