@Ilhan’s father was involved with the Somaliland genocide? Nur Omar Mohamed, one of General Mohamed Siyad Barre’s main henchmen? He was aligned with the Soviet Union. Estimates say around 200k were executed. Not a poor refugee. murderous communist exiles. At one time, @CNN actually had an interest in finding out what level of involvement @Ilhan’s father had . Something you definitely will not hear them ask any longer. One has to wonder why are they in the United States in the first place?

@ChrisMurphyCT’s Claim on BSCA Funding Cuts misleading at best, or blatant dishonesty.

1/ Senator Murphy claims Trump “ended the kids’ mental health and neighborhood anti-gun violence funding” from the 2022 BSCA. This is misleading. The $1B in grants was canceled, but other funding—like SAMHSA’s $857M MHBG, $1.34B from Title IV-A, and $190B in ESSER funds—covers similar needs. 🧵 2/ By implying the BSCA grants were the only source for these programs, Murphy creates a false sense of scarcity. Schools can use Title IV-A or ESSER funds for mental health, and cities tap DOJ grants for violence intervention. Omitting this context exaggerates the impact of the cut. Dishonest framing. 🔍

Post 1
Fact-check: Sen. Chris Murphy claims Republicans are attacking Social Security to privatize it for Wall Street. Let’s break this down—his rhetoric is misleading, and despite decades of Dem warnings, privatization has never been enacted into law. 🧵 1/4 #SocialSecurity

https://twitter.com/chrismurphyct/status/1920645242446868885

History: GOP proposed privatization Bush in 2005 (personal accounts) and Rick Scott in 2022 (sunset plan with stock market shift). Both failed due to public opposition (77% oppose, per 2023 Data for Progress) and economic risks (e.g., 2008 crash). No law ever passed.

Thom Tillis’s Betrayal of American Voters and Trump’s agenda

Sen. Thom Tillis’s political actions with a doubt and clearly a betrayal of the America First movement and the voters who supported him. This report, grounded in a comprehensive review of his legislative record, corporate connections, and alignment with establishment interests, argues that Tillis’s actions are driven by personal ambition and allegiance to the military-industrial complex, undermining Trump’s agenda and the trust of his constituents. This analysis is a scathing rebuke, highlighting his pattern of obstructionism and self-interest, without offering balance to opposing views, as per the user’s directive.

Corporate Connections and Post-Senate Ambitions
Tillis’s corporate background is a critical lens through which to view his actions. Before entering politics, he held executive positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers and IBM, rising to partner at PwC, which equipped him with deep ties to corporate America Meet Thom - Thom Tillis, U.S. Senator for North Carolina. His campaign financing, detailed by OpenSecrets.org, reveals significant contributions from industries that could offer future opportunities. For the 2019-2024 period, his top contributor was the Blackstone Group, contributing $179,600, all from individuals, with top industries including “Retired” ($6,200,095), Securities & Investment ($2,280,218), Republican/Conservative ($1,884,058), Real Estate ($1,727,200), and Health Professionals ($905,184) OpenSecrets.org: Sen. Thom Tillis - Campaign Finance Summary. This financial support suggests that Tillis’s legislative decisions may be influenced by these sectors, particularly finance and defense, which are poised to offer lucrative board positions post-Senate.

Given his corporate experience, it seems likely that Tillis is positioning himself for roles in companies like Bank of America, IBM, or defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, especially given his advocacy for military spending. In 2019, he secured $1.8 billion for North Carolina military installations, a move that aligns with defense contractor interests and could open doors to future employment Tillis’s Office: Tillis Secures $1.8 Billion for North Carolina Military Installations. His hometown, Cornelius, near Charlotte, a hub for financial institutions, further supports this trajectory, as does his Senate work on Banking and Finance Committees, which enhances his appeal to corporate boards. Opposition to Trump’s Nominees: A Direct Betrayal
Tillis’s opposition to Ed Martin, Trump’s nominee for U.S. Attorney for D.C., is a direct contradiction to Trump’s America First agenda. As of May 2025, Martin, appointed interim U.S. attorney in January, has been controversial for firing prosecutors involved in January 6 cases, dropping charges against some defendants, and launching investigations into Trump’s political enemies ProPublica: Who Is Ed Martin, Trump’s Pick for D.C. U.S. Attorney?. Despite this, Tillis has stated he will not support Martin’s nomination, citing concerns over Martin’s stance on January 6, particularly his defense of some defendants CNN: Controversial pick for top DC prosecutor on thin ice as Trump wades into confirmation fight. This opposition is seen as sabotaging Trump’s ability to place loyalists in key positions, protecting the establishment’s grip on the DOJ.

This is not an isolated incident. Tillis also tried to sabotage Pete Hegseth’s nomination for Secretary of Defense, encouraging Hegseth’s ex-sister-in-law to provide a sworn statement alleging alcohol abuse and spousal mistreatment, hoping to sway other GOP senators [User-provided examples]. These actions suggest a pattern of obstructing Trump-aligned nominees, prioritizing establishment interests over voter mandates.

Judicial Overreach in California: How Judge Thurston’s Ruling Undermines Border Patrol Authority. It will be thrown out.

On April 29, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston issued a controversial injunction in the Eastern District of California that has reignited debates over the role of the judiciary in immigration enforcement. Her ruling prohibits U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents from making warrantless arrests of suspected undocumented immigrants unless there is an imminent risk of escape, bans coercive "voluntary departures," and mandates that Border Patrol report all detention and deportation activities in the district every 60 days. While Thurston’s decision aims to address alleged Fourth Amendment violations tied to racial profiling by Border Patrol agents, it constitutes judicial overreach by directly contradicting the statutory authority granted under 8 U.S.C. § 1357, undermining the executive branch’s ability to enforce immigration law, and creating a fragmented national policy. The Legal Conflict: Thurston’s Ruling vs. 8 U.S.C. § 1357
At the heart of this controversy is a direct conflict between Thurston’s injunction and federal law. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2), Border Patrol agents are explicitly authorized to arrest without a warrant any alien in the United States if the agent has "reason to believe" the person is in the country illegally and there is a "likelihood of the person escaping before a warrant can be obtained." This provision reflects a deliberate choice by Congress to grant agents flexibility in immigration enforcement, recognizing the time-sensitive nature of border security operations. The Supreme Court has upheld this framework, affirming in United States v. Brignoni-Ponce (1975) that agents can conduct brief stops based on reasonable suspicion of immigration violations, with arrests requiring probable cause or the statutory escape condition.

Thurston’s ruling, however, imposes a stricter standard by requiring a warrant for arrests unless escape is imminent, effectively nullifying the warrantless arrest provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1357. Her order stems from a lawsuit filed by the ACLU and United Farm Workers, which alleged that Border Patrol’s "Operation Return to Sender" in January 2025 targeted farmworkers and day laborers in California based on skin color—a practice that, if true, would violate the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Evidence presented in court suggested agents conducted sweeps without specific, articulable facts to justify stops, relying instead on racial profiling, which the Supreme Court has ruled unconstitutional (United States v. Montero-Camargo, 1999).

While Thurston’s concern about constitutional violations is valid, her remedy oversteps the judicial role. Instead of addressing specific abuses—such as prohibiting racial profiling or mandating better documentation of reasonable suspicion—she imposes a blanket requirement that overrides a federal statute. Courts have the authority to strike down agency actions that violate the Constitution, but they must do so narrowly, ensuring their rulings do not broadly undermine laws passed by Congress. By effectively suspending 8 U.S.C. § 1357 in her district, Thurston substitutes her policy judgment for that of the legislative branch, a hallmark of judicial overreach.

🚨 Alarming Ties to Iran in Houston: Al-Hadi School’s Connection to Money Laundering and Ideological Indoctrination 🚨
At the end of my thread, I’ve added several other threads that other people have written in detail on other aspects surrounding this troubling issue. 🧵 Let’s break this down step by step:

🕰️ What Happened and When?
In 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) exposed a major Iranian money laundering operation involving PAYMENT24, a company run by Seyed Sajjad Shahidian (CEO) and Vahid Vali (COO). From 2009 to 2018, PAYMENT24 helped Iranian citizens bypass U.S. sanctions by facilitating illegal transactions—like buying U.S. software and servers—using fake IDs, PayPal accounts, and UAE-based IP addresses. The DOJ indicted them for wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. Here’s the kicker: the land where Al-Hadi School in Houston operates was linked to this scheme via the Islamic Education Center (IEC), tied to the Alavi Foundation, a front for Iran’s regime.

Trump, we need to run from CBDCs—NOW. It’s not a digital dollar; it’s China’s dystopia, copy-pasted. Their digital yuan tracks every move, ties to social credit scores, and wipes out freedom—dissidents can’t buy a noodle if the Party says no. This is the SAME model: total surveillance, frozen accounts, and bureaucrats deciding your life. Europe’s digital euro is next, and their banking system wants us in line. America’s not about that—our rights aren’t for sale. Trump’s executive order killed this once; he must bury it deeper and cut all ties with Europe’s control freaks. China’s shown the endgame: no privacy, no freedom, just obedience. Distance us fast, or we’re handing our souls to the machine. Why It’s Exactly Like China’s Model and Erodes Personal Freedom:

1. Surveillance Blueprint:
- China’s e-CNY logs every transaction—where, when, what. Paired with social credit scores, it’s a leash: buy something "unapproved" (say, protest gear), and your score tanks. A U.S. CBDC could do the same—track you, judge you, punish you. Freedom’s gone when your wallet’s a snitch.

Constitutional Court 🇷🇴 just annulled the entire electoral process for the presidential elections, i.e. both rounds.

SHAMEFUL!!!
Coup d’etat in full force!
We are not taking to the streets,
we will not be challenged,
this system must fall democratically!
#zelena Angry patriots are on the streets of Romania just minutes after the government barred Călin Georgescu from running in the election

Multiple arrests have been made 🇷🇴
#zelena

Last year, the U.S. poured $1.16 billion into South Africa—$453 million for PEPFAR, $60 million via USAID, and $650 million more in other aid. That’s a hefty chunk of support, yet some say they don’t want 'outside white help.' Fine. It’s time to cut the cord. South Africa can stand on its own two feet—let’s end the aid and redirect those dollars to Americans who need it. Independence is what they claim they want, so let’s give it to them. Time to Cut U.S. Foreign Aid to South Africa via @Heritage heritage.org/global-politic…

Director Of The FBI James Comey Testimony Against Hillary Clinton

- Had classified material
- Distributed classified emails
- Deleted subpoenaed emails
-Committed perjury to FBI

All on the record. NO CRIMINAL CHARGES

Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felonies for a filing error. 🧵

#zelena #Trump #riyadh James Comey PANICKING over the thought of a second Trump Administration.

“Trump is coming for those Institutions.”

Now, his honeypot operation targeting Trump’s campaign is being investigated by Kash Patel and Dan Bongino.
#zelena #DIESEL

TREASON🐍Steps to recall Gen. Milley: SecDef orders him back to active duty under 10 USC 688 citing alleged treason. As a retiree, he’s still under UCMJ. No consent needed—takes prez approval. Could start w/ probe into China calls. Pardon complicates it.
#zelena Stripping commission: Army Sec. could terminate it for cause (10 USC 1161) post-investigation, or a court-martial conviction (e.g., treason) could dismiss him. Grade review by Hegseth might cut rank too. Pardon doesn’t block admin moves.
#zelena

Thread: George Soros and the Funding of Progressive Prosecutors 🧵 [1/8]

George Soros has invested heavily in electing progressive prosecutors across the U.S., spending over $40M in the past decade to support candidates in major cities. Here's a breakdown of the scale, mechanisms, and impact.
#zelena #jailstool #URGENTE [2/8] Scale and Impact
- Soros has backed at least 75 prosecutors, representing 72M+ Americans (1 in 5).
- Covers half of the 50 most populous U.S. cities/counties.
- From 2018-2021, he spent $13M on 10 key races, often providing up to 90% of campaign funds.

Expanding the empowerment of President Trump through the Impoundment Control Act would offer several significant benefits, enhancing his ability to lead effectively and efficiently: 🧵

Empowering President Trump through an expansion of the Impoundment Control Act could revolutionize how the executive branch operates, offering benefits that align with his campaign promises and leadership style. By granting the President greater authority over fiscal matters, this change would provide the levers needed for more effective policy implementation, rapid response to crises, and increased accountability. This move towards executive empowerment could streamline government action, ensuring that the administration's actions reflect the priorities and needs of the American public, fostering a government that is both more responsive and aligned with the electorate's mandate. - Fiscal Responsibility: By giving President Trump the authority to withhold funds from programs he deems inefficient or unnecessary, the administration could better manage taxpayer dollars, potentially reducing wasteful spending and saving billions. This aligns with Trump's promise to "drain the swamp" by ensuring government operations are lean and focused on essential services.

1. Military Spending Reforms:
- Example: In 2020, Trump suggested he could withhold military funds if NATO allies did not meet spending targets. This could be seen as an example of how impoundment powers might be used to push for fiscal responsibility among allies, indirectly saving U.S. taxpayer money.

2. Government Waste:
- Example: The Government Accountability Office (GAO) often highlights areas of government waste. Expanding presidential authority could mean directly addressing these findings by withholding funds from programs that consistently fail audits or are identified as inefficient, like certain Defense Department projects that have been criticized for cost overruns.

3. Unspent and Unnecessary Funds:
- Example: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been noted for not fully spending allocated funds in areas like border security infrastructure. An empowered President Trump could redirect these funds to more urgent or effective areas, aligning with his campaign promises on immigration control.

4. Healthcare Programs:
- Example: Trump's administration attempted to modify Obamacare funding, suggesting that some funds could be redirected or withheld to push for reforms or to eliminate what they viewed as inefficiencies. More control over budget execution could mean better alignment of healthcare spending with conservative policy goals.

5. Infrastructure Projects:
- Example: Trump's infrastructure plan proposed leveraging private investment for public projects. If given more control over federal infrastructure funds, he could potentially withhold money from projects not meeting efficiency or economic return expectations, redirecting it to more promising initiatives.

6. Foreign Aid:
- Example: The Trump administration has at times threatened to withhold foreign aid to push for policy changes in recipient countries. Expanded impoundment powers could allow for more strategic use of foreign aid, ensuring it aligns with U.S. strategic interests and fiscal policy, potentially saving money by cutting aid to less effective programs.

7. Draining the Swamp:
- Example: Trump's promise to "drain the swamp" was partially aimed at reducing government bureaucracy. He could use impoundment to challenge the funding of agencies or departments he believes have ballooned in size or scope without clear benefits to taxpayers, thereby pushing for a leaner government.

These examples illustrate how giving President Trump more authority over how appropriated funds are spent could lead to what supporters might argue is more responsible fiscal management, aligning with his campaign promises to make government more efficient and focused on core services. However, these points should be considered in light of the legal, political, and ethical debates surrounding impoundment powers.

The EPA: An Institution Beyond Repair

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), once established with the noble mission of safeguarding our environment, has morphed into an entity that not only oversteps its bounds but actively undermines the very principles of freedom, economic stability, and public interest it was meant to serve. It is time to acknowledge that the EPA must be dismantled. Destabilizing Our Infrastructure

Consider the disastrous policy of mandating electric vehicles (EVs) while simultaneously undermining the stability of our electrical grid. Democrats, through their control of the EPA, have pushed for EV mandates without a corresponding plan to bolster the grid's capacity. This is not just poor planning; it's a deliberate act of negligence that threatens our national infrastructure. The result? A grid teetering on instability, unable to support the surge in demand these mandates create, leading to potential blackouts and economic chaos. The EPA's push for EVs, divorced from practical considerations, is a clear indicator of an agency out of touch with reality and the needs of the American people.

A brief history of the raping gangs that the British government has totally overlooked at the demise of the young girls that were prayed upon by Muslims

A little reminder that these are the faces of the convicted grooming gangs in the UK. As of middle 2023. A couple of women. A couple of white faces. 83% are British Pakistani men.

Now ask why their community did nothing to stop them. Here's a customized historical breakdown of the issue of grooming gangs in Britain, with a focus on the involvement of the British government and the role of Tommy Robinson:

### Early Awareness (1990s - Early 2000s)
- Discovery: The phenomenon of grooming gangs, particularly involving British Pakistani men targeting vulnerable, often white, working-class girls, began to be recognized in the 1990s. However, it was not widely acknowledged or acted upon by authorities due to fears of being perceived as racist.

### Public and Media Exposure (Mid-2000s - 2010)
- Media Investigation: The issue started gaining significant media attention with journalists like Andrew Norfolk of The Times exposing the scale of child sexual exploitation in towns like Rotherham. His articles in 2011 highlighted the systemic failures in protecting victims.
- Government Response: During this period, there were calls for action, but responses were often criticized for being inadequate or influenced by political correctness, which delayed justice for victims.

25 allegations of possible criminal activity involving John Brennan detail thread. I would suspect that this could allegedly be the reason for his panic over the resignation of Chris Wray, along with the appointment of Kash Patel to head the FBI. 1. CIA Torture Program - Brennan was implicated in policies involving the CIA's use of enhanced interrogation techniques, which some consider to be torture and potentially criminal under international law.