Yet this paper (which btw doesn’t cover boosters) tells us nothing that couldn’t easily be identified as at least a potential and likely as an actual risk over a year ago.
Yet onwards the injection program marched, damaging thousands of young hearts in the process.
Jun 15 • 14 tweets • 4 min read
Here’s an article from 2009 reporting on a meeting of a group of billionaires.
To me, its significance lies in what these individuals think the limits of their influence should be and how they should exercise power.
They met secretly, instituted by Gates, to discuss how to to join forces to get over those pesky religious and political objections to their plans to “save the world”.
Jun 12 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
It's the one-year anniversary of these mask-free social-distancing free frolics enjoyed by these criminals in Cornwall.
At the same time 50k couples were cancelling their wedding plans.
Does their behaviour scream “we are in the middle of a deadly pandemic to you?”
The difference between corrupt leaders and the people they govern has never been more stark.
Learning how few cared then and how few seem at all bothered now has been devastating for those of us who do.
Jun 9 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
An assumption is made that because a large chunk of the excess deaths in the March / April 2020 "wave" were labelled as Covid, they were caused primarily by a virus.
We need to consider the possibility that policy responses were responsible for a large part of these.
For one thing, we know that attributing death to specific cause(s) - especially in the elderly - has always been difficult.
In Spring 2020 there were a number of factors which created huge pressure to attribute deaths to Covid, even in the absence of symptoms.
I haven't looked through this yet in detail but one thing stood out:
May 29 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
Only 3 comments remain visible after “moderation” - despite >1000 likes for them, showing heavy engagement generally.
I wonder how many deleted comments were contradicting the “incredibly safe….unlucky few” in the headline.
Such has been the power of the deliberate vilification strategy, that in one of the 3 comments remaining, even someone personally suffering feels the need to insist on not being an “anti-vaxxer” to still be heard.
May 5 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
Anyone seen this brilliant series about the Purdue Pharma and Oxycontin (a long-acting opiod) scandal of the late 1990s / early 2000s?
It tells the story of a pharma company who came up with a new formulation of a drug and pushed it mercilessly while it was obvious to many that it was harming people (through addiction / overdoses).
Apr 8 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
If the LNP / mRNA platform used for the C19 injections was being used for any purpose other than against an infection disease, many further preclinical safety studies would have been required.
These have been waived in the case of the C19 injections.
This is because for regulatory purposes they have been treated as vaccines.
The basis for the waiving of these requirements for vaccines is that the injected material has no direct activity beyond the injection site as it is broken down in the muscle.
The abstract reads like it's written by a group of people held hostage and told to write something, anything, but DON'T MENTION THAT THE MRNA INJECTIONS MADE NO MATERIAL DIFFERENCE
Mar 4 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
The Australian Regulator expects doctors to refrain from espousing views - including even when publishing papers - consistent with evidenced-based material if it’s not consistent with public health messaging.
Interesting pre-print data from Israel on 4th dose in Health Care Workers.
This is yet further evidence that the C19 vaccinations may well INCREASE risks to people around those injected.
It seems blindingly obvious to me that something which decouples symptoms from viral load will potentially lead to people who are infected and infectious not realising they are ill.
So it will increase the chance of infectious people going to work rather than staying home.
Feb 15 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Some common dense here in @guardian but some delusional thinking as well.
The comments on adverse events completely ignore:
1. known and documented underreporting between 10 and 100 fold;
2. signficant age skewing in Covid deaths / serious illness.
5. known superiority (duration and breadth) of natural acquired immunity
These factors - when taken together - completely alter the picture as regards the risk:benefit ratio for the non-vulnerable.
Dec 21, 2021 • 22 tweets • 6 min read
The entire narrative around "ICU's are 90% full of unvaccinated" is - on its own - misleading and irrelevant to the majority of the population in terms of the benefits or otherwise of being vaccinated against Covid19.
Let's pretend it is true (which I very much doubt).
Setting aside the murkiness around the definitions being used for "unvaccinated", without an age breakdown and details about BMI and other markers of poor health, such data cannot - and should not - be extrapolated to the general healthy population.