At heart of BBC story is what appears to be a very vulnerable person and a family in pain. Handling of it & facts of it will come out in the wash, rather than slaying whichever opposition is convenient I hope what we learn is how sexual exploitation of vulnerable people happens My experience of years in field is that often sexual exploitation begins with an image, an image that is then used as leverage. I don't know anything about this case but hope that if anything we can try to learn about these dangers. Also that adults can be sexually exploited too.

Pleased for the campaigners that 3 years after proposing this or any offender management that Government (who voted against our amendments) have finally come around. However devil in detail. This says those convicted of coercive control and sentenced which will be tiny numbers.

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1627555802369126400

In same press release it talks of 2.4 million victims, this scheme targeting those convicted of coercive controlling behaviour. Last year about 900,000 cases of domestic abuse raised with police of that only 40,000 were flagged as coercive controlling behaviour so less than 5%.

Example: Constant push by the Home Secretary herself about bogus Modern Slavery applications to subvert immigration enforcement. She fails to understand that individuals cannot claim to be victims of modern slavery. Only Home Office approved agencies, using HO guide can do that.

https://twitter.com/jessphillips/status/1588444966480711681

If there are bogus claims in system then it is one of the approved agencies who made them. Heres the list that Home Office itself monitors & approves. Is she suggesting Police, the Home Office itself or Border Force are making bogus claims? If she is, that's her staff doing it.

Lot wrong with this story, an abuse of power a feeling that women are usable & dispensable to Johnson. So far no surprises. Fact that our current Policing minister instead of doing anything about Johnsons behaviour blocked a woman's progress and supported BJ to be PM is grim.

https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1545825138821791745

If he had concerns about their closeness why didn't he speak out against Johnson? Why didn't he say, don't make this man PM he uses his position to have relations with women and then tries to get them jobs before discarding them. Why was it her who had to speak, where was he

Sorry somehow lost the first bit of thread there let's start again. 1.Yesterday I was alerted to a completely fake headline that was being put on @Twitter about me, that puts me my family and staff at risk of violence. It is completely fake 2.It had been shared 280 times by the time I saw it and reported it to @TwitterSupport reaching a possible audience of millions. I have no recourse to take further action as this was an anonymous account.

1/5 There seems to be a lot of debate about public shaming going on. It's a good thing that we pause for thought. Very often the problem people face ahead of speaking publicly about something is that other avenues of correction fail them because of power imbalance. 2 Every case of harassment I have handled in Westminster for example, the press was not the first port of call for those harmed, it was the last. Having tried to get support from the institutions when they slammed the door and the disinfectant of sunlight becomes the only option

Thread. I find the proposals to "review" the judges and and judicial review process chilling. Having assisted with a number of judicial reviews and super complaints to protect victims of domestic abuse I can see that without the courts citizens would have been less safe. One judicial review stopped councils being able to demand local connection for access to housing for victims and their children who had to flee beyond their local authority area. It gave safety to people threatened with murder and rape.

Hi @JamesCleverly, this morning you said you can't investigate new MP Jamie Wallis over his links to a 'sugar daddy' website exploiting young woman because you "don't have the full details of the business relationship".

Well I'm happy to help.

https://twitter.com/Femi_Sorry/status/1218827952227540992

Sugar-Daddy.net was run by SD Billing Ltd. web.archive.org/web/2010030505…

SD Billing Ltd was set up and owned by Fields Group Ltd. beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/059641…

I have had my own experience of this, where things are sent for investigation rather than suspension or expulsion, until someone finds out and might go public. In one case involving me, someone, I don't know who, had complained to the party about another member

https://twitter.com/wesstreeting/status/1150135521362006018

Amongst a variety of issues raised including anti-Semitism, there was a tweet from this member about the case of Rosie Cooper MP and the plot to kill her by far right terrorists. The Labour member had said in their tweet that Rosie was the wrong target and it should have been me