SCIENCE TEACHING AND EVIDENCE: A THREAD
#ASEChat #SciEd #ScEd

@ESERA_org @NARSTorg @chrisharriKings @BestEvSciTeach @JustinDillonUCL @JaumeAmetller1 @DignaCouso @mrjimene @adamboxer1 @sci_challenge @IOPTeaching @TheRSC @RoyalSocBio @agittner @chemDrK Current discourse on t=l (sec) sci ignores decades of research. @BestEvSciTeach host a fab website, not widely enough used, ignored in 'evidence-based practice' discourse.

THE PRACTICE OF TEACHING AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: A THREAD

There’s been about academic research (eg British Educational Research Journal) and its irrelevance and inaccessibility for teachers (and by implication its uselessness). This thread aims to clarify and illuminate. WHO DOES RESEARCH? (2) Adam Boxer on Twitter: "Ed acaemics shouldn't be surprised teachers don't read their research. They don't find it relevant, useful, accessible, or even interesting. Look at the four most recent blogs on the BERA site: > " /Twitter

The #EarlyCareerFramework and @EducEndowFoundn blog on Prior Knowledge and Misconceptions: a thread

@JustinDillonUoE @chrisharriKings @chemDrK @agittner @Alexbclearning @ViciaScience @NeedhamL56 @leighhoath @sci_challenge @RBrockPhysics @JamesSnook18 @HassunElZafar @JaumeAmetller1 @ErduranSibel @jpscience @EdSacredProfane @AnttiLeht @hjwain @holman_john @ed_podesta @apf102