Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Kaitlyn M. Werner, PhD Profile picture
Kaitlyn M. Werner, PhD
@kaitlynmwerner
NIH Postdoc studying self-control, motivation, and emotion @uoregon. Former #banting fellow @uoft, provost fellow @penn, & PhD @carleton_u. #firstgen
Jul 5, 2019 • 14 tweets • 3 min read
As pre-registration becomes more popular, I've always wondered - if we can pre-register our hypotheses and analytical plan, then why don't we include our code? Today I decided to be as open as possible in my pre-registration and did just this. It's super easy, so here's how: 1/n I started by drafting up the typical pre-reg (I personally like the aspredicted form on OSF). I filled it in as usual, including a detailed description of my analyses (Q5 on the AP form). I put a note indicating that an INITIAL draft of the code will be in the project folder. 2/n
Jul 22, 2018 • 15 tweets • 5 min read
So, a few months ago I submitted my first paper with open data. A couple of weeks ago, the paper got rejected because of the data I shared. Let me tell you, this experience has been quite a rollercoaster ride. Thread 1/n When preparing the data, I scrutinized the hell out of the files. I wanted to make sure the variable names made sense to anyone who stumbled across the data, I quadruple checked all of the analyses. I posted the r script. Surely, there was nothing that I missed, right? 2/n
Jul 18, 2018 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
What is the future of well-being research? Looking forward to this exciting symposium organized by Maike Luhmann #ecp2018 Felix Cheung: assessing changes is life satisfaction and hope during the Syrian war

LS: 1.1 SD drop
Hope: 0.5 SD drop
PA: 0.6 SD drop
NA: 1.0 SD increase
Jun 28, 2018 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
So, basically, it's Zimbardo's words against the participants' and, despite there being evidence against Z's recounts, he is SO SURE that he is right. Because, you know, it's not like he has anything riding on this experiment or whatever 🙄 This guy is ridiculous and a total sham In fact, Z goes on to say the Ps weren't acting (despite one explicitly saying he did) because what would they get from that? I wish the reporter would have asked him the same question: well, you have a lot of motive here, so what could YOU possibly get (or lose) from all this?