How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/annalsofim/status/1711834106009419777If you evaluate such a model *after* it has been linked to a clinical workflow, the model’s “apparent” performance will look worse.

TidierPlots.jl is getting to be crazily feature-complete, even supporting `geom_text()`, `geom_label()`, and faceting.
https://twitter.com/prpayne5/status/1642917015739416577In earlier single-center study @umichmedicine, our paper and accompanying editorial framed our AUC 0.63 as a failure of “external” validity. The result was somewhat surprising bc other studies reported higher AUCs/sens/spec.

One interesting thing is that lag() and lead() take in a vector and return a vector (similar to ntile).
If you use distinct() without any arguments, it behaves just like the #rstats {tidyverse} distinct().

https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1628464344785727489When we link an intervention to a model threshold (eg alerts), we often worry about overalerting.
We use 4 case studies to show how a resource constraint diminishes the usefulness of a model and changes the optimal resource allocation strategy.
While the FDA was established formally by the FD&C Act in 1938, it didn't gain the authority to regulate medical devices until 1976 when the FD&C Act was amended.
https://twitter.com/gwstagg/status/1495495339444473858When the web was first introduced, there wasn't a clear choice of what scripting language should be used, before the world settled on using JavaScript, which implements the ECMAScript specification (see here: ).
When people talk about risk stratifying cancer outcomes, there’s an implicit assumption that’s what being modeled is biology.
https://twitter.com/IAmSamFin/status/1415417258873131011Why silent? Shouldn’t it be obvious if models get miscalibrated over time?
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1186114527668199425
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1407208969039396866Our biggest limitation is that our results come from a single center.
https://twitter.com/jamainternalmed/status/1407005406514319361Here are some questions that come up:
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1370216736130220037
First, let’s poll folks who felt the model shouldn’t be used. What aspect of the model were you dissatisfied with?
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1370978346763444224The maximal net benefit of a model in a given setting is determined by the proportion of people who experience the outcome.
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1367569074759294978
https://twitter.com/kdpsinghlab/status/1370216729889140737
I’ll get to why I voted for Model B but I’ll start in order and share everything I looked at to arrive at that opinion.
One issue that touched a nerve was that in my example, I calculated a post-hoc threshold based on sensitivity. Was I wrong to do this? Let me give an example as to why this happened in this situation, why it *might've* been our only option, and how I would do it differently. https://twitter.com/vickersbiostats/status/1366068394408222730
Lack of understanding isn't for a lack of trying on the part of its authors. There are dozens of papers w/ thousands of citations!