Because i'm sick and tired of always pointing out the validity or logic behind Zack Snyder's vision of Superman & DCEU films, i'm going to disband what all detractors hide behind; the source material. Namely to prove their utter ignorance of it. I can go into the Golden Age era, but they'll likely claim its outdated (its not. The Genesis of Superheroes is never outdated). I'm not using the Silver Age for obvious reasons bc it's not the end all, be all of Superman. Nah, i'm going to the Post Crisis reboot with MOS #1...

So, I was browsing the interwebs and I came across a page from 2016; someone asking someone else what he thought of Zack's decision to not include a scene of Superman blocking out cries for help in BvS bc they interfered with finding Martha Kent. Unsurprisingly, logic takes leave And down a rabbit hole it goes about how it would mean he let ppl die (when does he not?) and that Superman's one rule is "there's always another way" (but said guy reviews back issues of post crisis continuity where he literally mostly fails to "another way"). Then, something

Now for the "Zack's approach was wrong, Superman shouldn't have been deconstructed" kool aid drinkers, a reality check. This approach had become consistent with Superman comics since Man of Steel miniseries for 2+ decades, he was just the first to bring it to the film medium.

https://twitter.com/scedydesigner/status/1115246019762171904

Superman was deconstructed starting from that mini. From a powerful being considering himself wholly human, to Clark being a career driven reporter, to him struggling with the idea he's not supposed to find love with Lois. Seriousness IS the norm for the comics, not exception.