A little footnote of G7 diplo wranglings in our story on Israel's next moves bylined by my excellent colleagues @DovLieber @cjkeller8 and @AnatPeled1 We got first draft of the G7 leaders statement on Saturday's Iran attacks. It underwent big changes. -1-wsj.com/world/middle-e… The original draft labeled Iran’s actions “reckless” and said Iran had “crossed yet another line” in destabilizing the region. It expressed “unconditional” solidarity with Israel and an “ironclad” -- the Biden phrase --G-7 commitment toward its security. -2-

Language for EU ammo target over the next 12 months for Ukraine is now looser. EU will be "aiming at" a million shells over the next year. But there is still a discussion over whether to allow purchases of ammo from foreign countries. That has not been fully settled yet. So that will go to ministers despite claims there is a deal. -2-

E3 Statement at IAEA Board: gov.uk/government/spe… -1- "We note that following discussions between the Director General and Vice-President Eslami, and that, due to the Director General’s efforts, a Joint Statement was agreed on 4 March where Iran agreed “on a voluntary basis” to “allow the IAEA to implement further appropriate" -2-

As I suspected on Saturday, @rafaelmgrossi narrative about what happened in Tehran last week is partially unravelling under questioning by @francoismurphy. His clear answers Sat eve about what was agreed are sounding much less certain today. #Iran -1- So on the Fordow inspections, the number of monthly visits remains at 11, as was agreed by DDG in previous trip. Went from 8 to 11. That's Grossi's 50% claim. But there was no agreement to raise it further in Tehran last week -2-

Behind @ZelenskyyUa tour of European capitals, some extraordinary diplomatic jostling took place behind the scenes, we report tonight. With @MaximColch & @bopanc wsj.com/articles/ukrai… @EmmanuelMacron @eucopresident -1- Michel had pushed for the trip when he was in Kyiv on Jan 19th. @ZelenskyyUa was reluctant because of perfectly reasonable security concerns. But he warmed to idea in recent weeks & was already leaning towards when EU leaders in Kyiv last week. -2-

Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia pressing today in a letter on use of frozen assets for Ukraine. "However in order to be credible on this matter vis-a-vis Ukraine, we must go beyond reiterating our commitment & accelerate our work in the Council right now." -1- "All assets should be used to cover the costs of Russian aggression against Ukraine, including to support Ukraine internally displaced people, as well as to the benefit of the future reconstruction of Ukraine." -2-

Just ran: Interview with @JosepBorrellF from Ukraine on the #Irandeal and its prospects. wsj.com/articles/eus-t… -1- On a secure train returning from an EU trip to Kyiv, @JosepBorrellF told @WSJ that critics of his efforts to revive the pact perhaps “don’t value enough” dangers of nuclear Iran. “As far as I know, there is not an alternative to this deal to try to avoid Iran becoming nuclear"-2-

@HankeVela @alanbeattie This really isn't unexpected. It's expected. It has been likely she'd go for a couple of weeks as I've tweeted. @HankeVela @alanbeattie Indeed, as i said earlier, one of the UK conditions was that a non-EU country host it next time and Britain was keen. It's a way of locking in their main concern -- that this becomes a mere EU+ Brussels dominated format.

Thank god we didn’t send those modern tanks. Or Putin would have escalated. On a less sarcastic note, what does this say about Putin’s utter disrespect for institutions like UN and for those all too many heads of state trying to stay neutral on this? He does it right in the middle of UNGA where so many of the neutrals are pleasing for conflict end.

Lots of attention reasonably on Raisi's comments to @60Minutes about the Holocaust but less on his response to questions about his alleged role in killing of opposition political prisoners. Yet the response is extraordinary whatever your views of the MeK. Here's transcript: -1- Q: I want to ask you about your own record. There is a personal sanction against you. You took part in a commission that was responsible for executing up to 5,000 political dissidents. They were hanged or shot by firing squad. I want to ask if you regret that action.-2-

Pretty stinging rebuke of Russia by IAEA board. 26 in favor and 2 against. (Russia, China), The board "expresses grave concern that the Russian Federation has not heeded the call of the Board to immediately cease all actions against and at nuclear facilities in Ukraine;" -1- The board "deplores the Russian Federation’s persistent violent actions against nuclear facilities in Ukraine, including forcefully seizing of control of nuclear facilities and other violent actions in connection with a number of nuclear facilities and other" -2-

It’s an excellent touch that @vonderleyen flew to Kyiv after the State of EU speech. BUT it’s a democratic deficit that after the SOTEU annual speeches, Commission presidents don’t do big press conference to be quizzed on speech/proposals. It’s a serious lack of scrutiny. There were so many headline grabbing proposals, from single market access for Ukraine to global gateway with Biden and Defense of democracy pact that she should have been asked about. Of course, there’s time for these proposals to be fleshed out. But if she can announce them...

E3: “In this final package, the Coordinator made additional changes that took us to the limit of our flexibility. Unfortunately, Iran has chosen not to seize this critical diplomatic opportunity.” -1- “Instead, Iran continues to escalate its nuclear program way beyond any plausible civilian justification. While we were edging closer to an agreement, Iran reopened separate issues that relate to its legally binding international obligations under the Non Proliferation Treaty”-2-

A couple of new tidbits on #IranTalks. My understanding is that while #Iran is seeking a change to the safeguards text the EU offered, that's mainly on intended date to close probe by Confirmation Day. It is not explicitly seeking upfront guarantee that probe will be closed. -1- Separately, my understanding is that all excess centrifuges of type mentioned as permissible in deal (IR-1, IR-2, IR-2M, IR-4/6/8) will be removed and kept under seal whole. Only the experimental centrifuges of other types (IR-9s) will be effectively dismantled.-2-

What’s interesting in Raisi safeguards comments today is not only is he doubling down on Iran threat not to re-implement deal if safeguards probe isn’t closed, there’s a hint here he’s unhappy with safeguards language in the EU text & wants to push again for a guarantee. -1- It may be he doesn’t have full grasp on issue so is being imprecise or is trying to look as if he’s standing up for Iran’s interests even though Iran team did NOT take issue with the safeguards language in their response to EU two weeks ago. But here’s the translation I have -2-

Yeah, because what joy and prosperity Iran’s guns and money have created in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq.

https://twitter.com/s_m_marandi/status/1563750564256677888

Lots of reax to this tweet. Some positive, some very negative. I don't know of many who would argue west's interventions in MidEast over recent decades have been a striking success. Libya good example. -1-

What did Iran most resent about JCPOA? The slow economic benefits it generated because of extreme caution by western banks/firms. What has it pressed for most in current negotiations? Multiple economic guarantees and assurances that it won't happen again - or at least that -1- it won't be as slow as last time. What are the biggest threats to that? 1/ Republican majority congress and presidency in 2025. 2/ The threat of renewed non-nuclear sanctions vs Iran firms/banks. Needn't be more than a few sanctions targets to chill western economic ties. -2-

This is such an important point. So I repeat it. We know and have known for a week that Iran didn't include safeguards in its list of issues it was concerned about in its response to EU text on Aug 15. Implying that it could live with the new safeguards language in text.BUT...-1-

https://twitter.com/hrome2/status/1562105592822595584

that is ABSOLUTELY NOT the same as saying that Iran has dropped its demand that probe must be closed if deal is to be reimplemented. If the US know Iran has dropped this stance, that's significant. But the Iranian negotiating team is denying that on record. -2-

Some really strong comments today from @rafaelmgrossi to @BeckyCNN on the Iran probe and what he wants to see. But also a significant fudge. Grossi says the Agency will not drop the probe unless Iran offers full cooperation. "People say, "are you prepared to drop it?" Well... -1- "the key to this lies in one simple thing: will Iran cooperate with us? Give us the necessary answers, information, access to people and places so that we can clarify the very things that are still in need for clarification." My emphasis: people and places. -2-

At a press conference on sidelines of the Quo Vadis seminar in Spain, @JosepBorrellF gave a little insight on #IranDeal negotiations during a press conference a few minutes ago. Translated from Spanish he said that after circulating his proposal on the final text... -1- "There was an Iranian response that I think was reasonable." That was transmitted to U.S. and the U.S. has not yet responded. "We are awaiting its response and I hope that this response will allow us to complete the negotiations. I hope for that but I can't assure you of it"-2-

As far as I can see there are around half dozen possibilities tomorrow, which was the unofficial deadline for responding to the EU whether the #IranDeal participants accept the deal/text left on table after latest vienna talks. -1- 1/ I think most likely is that we get no Iranian response Monday at all. They like to make a point of ignoring western set deadlines and have been pretty scornful of idea that EU text from Monday is final and negotiations over. So doubtful we’ll get Iran response tomorrow. -2-