How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/mssprovenance/status/1607679809953632257Tacitly editing images of fragments seems to be her MO: adding borders where there are none, cropping for consistency of size, inserting a mis=matched binding, adding fake flyleaves, colorizing b/w images. How can readers trust such a deceptive author?
https://twitter.com/mssprovenance/status/16070216873876111372) If there's are missing leaves, show us where it is by indicating lacunae, as in this screenshot of my own work on the Beauvais Missal:
https://twitter.com/lisafdavis/status/1544262870304694274Step 1: identify recto & verso. Generally a straightforward task…look for the binding holes (i.e. the gutter), which, in a manuscript that reads left -> right will be on the left of the recto side. In this case, the leaf is heavily trimmed on all sides, so no binding holes!
https://twitter.com/leoba/status/1503757248228691971For example, here's a quire from August of the Sanctorale section. I've found 5 of the original 8 leaves of the quire, including two formerly-conjoint bifolia (in bright green):
https://twitter.com/BeineckeLibrary/status/1433247053023432705The story of the map's time in New Haven is fascinating. In the 1960s, the Italian-American community was furious that the map, when thought to be authentic, "proved" that other explorers from Europe had crossed the Atlantic before Columbus (gasp!) (nvm that we knew that already)
https://twitter.com/edearp7/status/13810218688288522271) Have you done the reading? If not, you’d better. There are actual factual things known about this manuscript, and if you’re solution isn’t consistent with those facts, then forget it. Here come some facts: