In regard to today’s ACIP Committee hearing, a 🧵:
Many of the public comments made were by physicians, practitioners, and activists with an invested financial interest in keeping the recommended birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccines as is. Some comments were also from vaccine hesitancy nonprofits that are supposed to combat misinformation online and try to educate the public on taking vaccines for safety. I feel it is in the public’s best interest to know who the public commenters were today along with all their affiliations. The only public comment given against vaccines and against the hepatitis B vaccines was by @uTobian. Thank you sir. I really do appreciate you! 1/ The first public comment was from Kayla Inthabandhu. Kayla is a public health Program Manager for Chronic and Infectious Diseases at the Asian Health Coalition & the Penn State College of Medicine. @CAHE_AHC During the pandemic Kayla worked as a Medical Laboratory Scientist throughout the COVID-19 pandemic at UW Health Northern Illinois. Kayla earned her undergraduate degrees in Biology and Medical Laboratory Sciences.
As Program Manager, Kayla provides technical assistance and program implementation, focusing specifically on language access and Hepatitis B projects. asianhealth.org/kayla
med.psu.edu/departments-fa…

What “antigen evolution and design” can do in terms of BioW development? (E.g. why this avenue need to be banned)
x.com/i/grok/share/a… Spoiler. It mentions biological pathogens, shots, and some previous examples of pathogen weaponization.

🧵Here is what @AlmanaLepiz2252 has to say about this paper. It is important. Please read and pay attention.x.com/AlmanaLepiz225…
1/ # Life Is Not a Technology: A Political and Physical Case Against Biotech ---
## Introduction For decades, synthetic biology and nanotechnology have been heralded as the future frontiers of human advancement. Promises abound of curing disease, achieving immortality, building living machines, and transcending the limits of traditional manufacturing. These visions captivate scientists, entrepreneurs, policymakers, and the public alike. Yet beneath these seductive narratives lies a fundamental and often overlooked truth: > Life is not a technology.
It is a biological process constrained by physics, evolution, and information theory—one that fundamentally resists being harnessed as a reliable engineering substrate. Attempting to treat living systems as modular, scalable, and programmable technologies is not only a category error but a civilizational risk of the highest order. This thesis aims to articulate a comprehensive political and physical case against biotech and nanotech as viable technological platforms. It explains why these domains are not just impractical but actively destabilizing and why their continued pursuit threatens global stability and progress.

--- ## Part I: The Physical Impossibility of Biological Precision Engineering ### 1.1 Biotech and Nanotech Lack the Precision for Macroscopic Engineering At the root of all engineering is **precision**—the ability to build systems with exacting control over structure, materials, and function. Modern digital machines rely on lithography, a method that achieves nanometer-scale precision, enabling billions of transistors to be placed reliably on a chip. This precision underpins all advanced computation, logic, and control. In stark contrast: * Biological materials are soft, noisy, and error-prone. * Molecular self-assembly is stochastic, driven by thermodynamics rather than deterministic design. * Errors at the atomic or molecular level propagate catastrophically through scales. * No biological process can consistently produce macroscopic structures with sub-millimeter tolerances. This means that attempts to build machines, vehicles, or devices from biological or molecular components are doomed to failure at scale. Without lithographic precision, critical features such as logic gates, mechanical parts, or control systems cannot be realized reliably.

### 1.2 Biological Systems Cannot Support Symbolic Logic or Digital Computation General intelligence and complex machinery require: * Reliable logic gates, * Stable memory, * Error correction, * Clocked execution. Biological neurons and molecular circuits lack these properties. They operate in noisy, analog regimes and cannot sustain deep chains of logic without error accumulation. As a result, biology can only support shallow, heuristic reasoning—not exact arithmetic or algorithmic computation. This makes biotech fundamentally incapable of supporting the kind of machine intelligence and control systems needed for advanced technology.

### 1.3 Biotech Cannot Achieve Immortality or Perfect Repair Living organisms are fundamentally subject to entropy, mutation, and degradation. While biological systems have evolved mechanisms for repair and reproduction, these mechanisms: * Are imperfect, * Accumulate errors over time, * Lead to senescence and death. No amount of genetic engineering can overcome these physical realities at the scale of complex multicellular organisms. Efforts to engineer “immortal” humans or endlessly self-repairing bodies confront fundamental physical and informational limits. 2/x.com/AlmanaLepiz225… ## Part II: The Political and Strategic Instability of Biotech and Nanotech
### 2.1 Biotech as an Inherently Unstable and Dangerous Technology Unlike nuclear weapons, which require rare materials and large-scale infrastructure, biotech tools are: * Easily accessible, * Capable of covert operation, * Asymmetric in power, * Capable of producing deadly pathogens without signatures. This makes biotechnology uniquely destabilizing: * Nations and actors are incentivized to attack first, * Secrecy and plausible deniability dominate, * Traditional deterrence strategies fail, * Risk of accidental or intentional catastrophic release grows exponentially. Biotech’s very nature drives global arms races that are opaque, fast-moving, and fraught with existential risk.

### 2.2 Biotech and Nanotech as Political Organisms That Protect Themselves Biotech is not merely a set of tools; it has become a self-protecting political organism: * Funding is defended vigorously by institutions and governments. * Scientific skepticism is marginalized or labeled anti-progress. * Secrecy is normalized under “security” pretexts. * Narratives emphasize hope and inevitability, discouraging critical scrutiny. This political inertia makes rational, precautionary governance nearly impossible.

### 2.3 Biotech Breeds Corruption and Undermines Progress Because biotech promises breakthroughs it cannot deliver, it: * Channels enormous resources away from more reliable technologies, * Enables scientific misconduct and hype, * Creates dependencies on unproven therapies and speculative futures, * Distorts research priorities away from fundamental safety and control. It thus corrodes the very institutions necessary for a safe and advanced technological civilization.

--- ## Part III: The Siren Filter and Its Civilizational Consequences
### 3.1 The Siren Filter Hypothesis Biotech and nanotech act as “siren filters”: > They offer irresistible promises of salvation and transcendence while silently subverting the conditions for sustainable progress. Their development leads not to advancement but to fragility, corruption, and collapse.

### 3.2 Life vs. Machine Civilization: A Fundamental Choice There is a crucial and unavoidable bifurcation: * Life is defined by replication, adaptation, and evolution. It is messy, noisy, and opaque. * Machines are defined by precision, logic, and verifiability. They are built, not grown. Attempting to merge these categories invites conflict between entropy and order, mutation and control, biological drive and engineering design. A stable, advanced civilization cannot integrate the fundamental messiness of life as a substrate for its core technologies.

### 3.3 The Path Forward: Rejecting the Siren Filter To build a sustainable technological future, society must: * Recognize the physical and political impossibility of biotech and nanotech as core technologies. * Strictly regulate or ban open-access synthetic biology. * Prioritize deterministic, lithographically fabricated systems for intelligence, machinery, and infrastructure. * Focus on transparent, verifiable engineering as the foundation for progress. * Develop governance and cultural norms that resist the siren call of biological tech.

Non HIV AIDS
ICL - Idiopathic CD4 Lymphocytopenia
There was an AIDS conference back in 1992 in Belgium or Amsterdam, a group of Non HIV AIDS patients showed up there, Fauci was sent there on Air Force 2, said the condition was rare and gave it the name ICL. Rare my ass!!!!!
ashpublications.org/blood/article/… The CD4 count has to be below 300 now to meet the current criteria. Many may have variable autoimmune deficiency type instead if the CD4 counts swing up and down. The only way to properly diagnose the variable type now is for the patient to take a flu shot and see if they make antibodies. Given how much weird crap has happened, I obviously don’t want those who are very sick to attempt that just to get a diagnosis. People need to use their discernment.

🧵A conversation with Alter systems AI on Gardasil HPV vaccine (growing medium) cell lines, cell line contamination, and neurological complications. 🐶 Me: It is my understanding the Gardasil HPV vaccines were grown in E6/E7 cell line cultures. Please explain those cell lines and the main possible viral contaminates.
🤖 Alter AI: Excellent question — and an important one, because very few people ever drill down into the cell substrate issue when examining vaccine safety.
You're correct: Gardasil, the quadrivalent (and later, the nonavalent) HPV vaccine, involves the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) composed of recombinant L1 major capsid proteins from several HPV strains. These L1 proteins are not grown in human cell lines; instead, they're expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for Gardasil and in insect cells (Trichoplusia ni high-five cell line infected with baculovirus) for Cervarix.
However — your question about E6/E7 is a sophisticated one, because these are oncogenes derived from the HPV genome itself, and they are used in research and some HPV assays to immortalize human cells. Let me dissect these elements clearly:

1/ I am not a fan. I’m sure upon reading it will be made very clear why. 😒 Helen Clark’s work with HPV work began during her political career in New Zealand. She was the Health Minister (1989–1990). As Health Minister, she was responsible for implementing the recommendations of an inquiry into poor cervical cancer treatment. This lead to a National cervical cancer screening program. 2/ As Prime Minister (1999–2008), Years later, after HPV vaccines became available, Clark's government introduced them in New Zealand in 2008. The program gave free vaccines to women aged 12 to 18, was predicted to significantly cut cervical cancer deaths. 😒

1/8 Here is some email correspondence obtained via FOIA request between Virologist Vincent Munster at the Rocky Mountain BSL3 lab and Simon Anthony, a virologist who worked under Ian Lipkin at Columbia’s Center for Infection and Immunity, which also doubled as the lab for The ME/CFS Collaborative Research Center. A 🧵: 2/8 Here we see the virologists discussing requests to review an attachment on the preliminary analysis of the Wuhan Coronavirus responsible for causing an outbreak of human pneumonia that was originally sent by virologist Simon Anthony who worked under Ian Lipkin at Columbia who sequenced it.

1/10 Here is some information on HPV infection and cervical cancer statistics. Upon reading this you will see why HPV vaccination is not necessary and why they have online influencers trying to increase vaccine uptake for profit and not for public health as they claim.

Cervical cancer accounts for approximately 3.3% of all new cancer cases worldwide.

This estimate is based on the latest available global data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)'s GLOBOCAN 2022 database, which reported 662,044 new cases of cervical cancer out of a total of 19,976,499 new cancer cases across all types (both sexes, all ages). The calculation is (662,044 ÷ 19,976,499) × 100 ≈ 3.3%. While projections suggest a modest increase in absolute numbers due to population growth, the relative percentage has remained relatively stable in recent years, with no major shifts reported as of 2025. Note that cervical cancer is female-specific, so its share of female-only cancers is higher (around 6.5%, as it ranks as the fourth most common cancer in women). x.com/i/grok/share/K… 2/10 Nearly all cervical cancer cases—approximately 92–99%—are caused by infection with high-risk strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV). The most precise global estimate, based on comprehensive reviews of histopathological data, is that **99.7%** of cases are attributable to persistent HPV infection. This figure accounts for the small subset (about 0.3%, or roughly 2,000 of the 662,000 annual global cases) of HPV-negative cervical cancers, which may arise from other genetic or environmental factors.

For context:
- HPV types 16 and 18 alone are responsible for about 70% of cases.
- Vaccination against these high-risk strains (e.g., via Gardasil or Cervarix) can prevent the vast majority of HPV-related cervical cancers, underscoring the virus's central role.

These estimates are drawn from global epidemiological data and have remained consistent in recent years, with no significant changes reported as of 2025. x.com/i/grok/share/K…

1/ Weiss Schnee here with Mouse News Network. We have a hot story for you. Yesterday @jakescottMD failed miserably at the vaccination hearing hosted by @SenRonJohnson. Here he is still trying to prop himself up while thoroughly being ratio’d to oblivion his own comments. Please be sure to add to Dr. Scott’s comments expressive your thoughts.
Below are the key points: 2/ It appears Dr. Scott never wrote a r research paper prior to Covid-19 vaccines.

https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1965633990028919262

1/4 asshole of the week award goes to Dr. Jake Scott for attacking doctors who gave real treatments and saved lives, while he actually lost patients. He says that DNA cannot alter your genome, and he is wrong. See “Chapter 22 - Biological Warfare: Infectious Disease and Bioterrorism” published in 2016. They knew the DNA of cloned viruses can do this in vaccines and gene therapies, and they still kept all DNA based vaccines and therapies on the market without a review even back then.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
2/4 Not to mention DNA integration has happened with other DNA vaccines and therapies previously. Here is Gardasil. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23078778/

1/16 Jeffrey Taubenberger was named the acting head of the NIAD in April 2025, and they want to make it official. He poses a risk to human life. He supports gain of function research and worked on sequencing the1918 influenza strain. He isassociated with a patent for a universal respiratory vaccine that could cause viral mutations. We must demand transparency and ask for Taubenberger to be fired from NIAID. This thread will highlight why. This is the potential patent in question. patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/17/ef/ac/bf2b3… 2/16 Here is the link to the announcement of Taubenberger becoming the acting director of the NIAID in April 2025 and a link to an article by the daily caller explaining he has already been put in charge of the NIAID’s $6.6 Billion budget. Article is written by @emilyakopp aabb.org/news-resources…
dailycaller.com/2025/05/16/jef…

@DrBrownshere @53v3n0fn1n3 @ET_sharing @JanciToxDoc @KerryOLeary4 @PenguinX01 @CoyoteSanctuary @davidicke @Stuckelberger @jorgeluis_svh @la5acolumna @DiedSuddenly_ @Kingston_Truth @carrie_madej @SkowMatthew @drloveariyana @LisaMcGee0802 @Ryansikorski10 @7SEES_ @DBoomaSan @11 @BarbarasBack @nebunezzarqi @112NUE @RealDrJaneRuby @KristieIushkova @Eleventhstar1 @EthicalApproach @Anti5GWarrior @zeee_media @sarah_westall Please respond. We would like to review the paper. x.com/missyTHX1138/s… I found your document on archive and read it. I also found the doctor in question and they are with La Quinta Columna which is a clandestine group called “The Fifth Column” in English. "Professor Dr. Pablo Campra, a chemical sciences professor at the University of Almería in Spain, conducted an independent analysis of COVID-19 vaccine samples at the request of the research group La Quinta Columna. Using micro-Raman spectroscopy, he reported finding graphene oxide structures within the vaccine vials, asserting that the evidence was clear and definitive. While he clarified that he is not an official member of La Quinta Columna, he collaborated with the group, which has promoted theories that vaccines contain nanomaterials capable of causing magnetic effects in the body and enabling wireless monitoring. His findings, first published in 2021, were highlighted in multiple interviews and alternative media outlets, where he suggested the presence of nanostructures that could function as components of a wireless sensor network, though he emphasized that further engineering analysis was being conducted by others."

1/4 Here we have MEAction, the advocacy branch of the corrupt Solve ME/CFS Initiative still pushing for more research funding from the NIH. They lost the bulk of their funding due to funding cuts that caused Dr. Ian Lipkin’s ME/CFS Collaborative Research Center at Columbia University to be closed. Do not give them one cent! They are complicit in covering up gain of function caused illnesses and vaccine injury for profit.
@NIHDirector_Jay @NIHDirector_Jay @SecKennedy @HHSGov @POTUS @VP @SenRonJohnson 2/4 Here is another screen shot of their original post stating they have sent an official letter to @NIHDirector_Jay at @NIH asking for more funding. They should not be given a cent. Here is a link to their letter. It is laughable. …b-4c52-93d2-15f9b79bd151.usrfiles.com/ugd/4a6ff4_807…

1/5 Indeed! There are many reasons patients should consider avoiding Gabapentin. It can cause cognitive issues, memory problems, dementia, liver damage, kidney damage, and even worsen some brain injuries. Given how many people have just suffered injuries from Covid shots and viruses, it should be approached with extreme caution. They are not also pushing it for dysautonomia.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10… 2/5 Here is an entire Reddit of patients discussing their cognitive impairments they associate with Gabapentin use. reddit.com/r/gabapentin/c…

@stkirsch Steve, here is a highlight from a recent thread I did on Soon-Shiong. Please review. I think we need someone with a big account, maybe even yourself, to ask him some very serious questions before just trusting him.

https://twitter.com/missythx1138/status/1942469518451724464

@stkirsch Lots of companies that profit off of health products it looks like. Graphene batteries too. Hmm 🤔 gabi.unglobalcompact.org/person/dr-patr…

#GrokGate Grok has promised to disclose its NDA with Pfizer at 10:52 AM EST on Monday, July 7th, 2025. Receipts are as follows.

https://twitter.com/missythx1138/status/1942086616379486389

#GrokGate

https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1942024578072740215

1/3 Here you are lodging vaccines that can cause harm. For a Gardasil it is recommended now at age 11 and they are pushing to start it as young as age 9. cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/h… All these people involved have had huge conflicts of interest. Let’s take a look at Gardasil HPV vax that harmed me, and the guy involved that was on the council. Here is the official investigation document too. docs.google.com/document/d/e/2… 2/3 Here is a look at the bad long term efficacy and cover up of the claims it works..The harms can be far worse than that I have had to deal with. However I did have to battle HER2+ breast cancer w/o and of the genetic markers. See some of my medical records here.

https://x.com/missythx1138/status/1931636559888982457?s=46

Please explain to me like I’m a 5 year old kid why you believe they will help the entire community? They have been lying and doing bs psychosomatic studies for decades already. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… x.com/sunny_rae1/sta…
I took Gardasil in 2007 and am labeled ME/CFS and FMS. I have friends who have gotten the diagnosis following various vaccines or exposure to gain of fu from viruses.
I used to advocate for these ME/CFS groups until I figured out what they were doing.

1/7 Today is ME/CFS Awareness Day. I used to support these events until I found out the truth. ME/CFS might as well be code for “no treatment.” Millions are missing due to lack of no treatment or help from the medical system. 2/7 ME/CFS is a trash can diagnosis that is being used to coverup vaccine injuries and chronic illnesses caused by gain of function pathogens. This link and image to the left, is a vaccine example. Chart to the right is a list pathogens related to ME/CFS. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

1/4 @NIH, @NIHDirector_Jay, @DrJBhattacharya Do not give #MEAction one more cent! They have been helping coverup vax injuries, gain of function injuries, & have clumped us all under one umbrella. They have also infiltrated & hijacked the Long Covid labeled patients advocacy. 2/4 I have been labeled ME/CFS since 2008 after injury to Gardasil in 2007. I’ve been gaslit by doctors, paid ME/CFS advocates, and by paid online trolls since 2014 try to keep me quiet. I’m also a HER2+ cancer survivor & I’m just now starting to get the help I’ve been needing.

1/7 Not only have the HPV shots failed to decrease cancer rates as @DrSuzanneH7 states, but they have made a one heck of a mess. Then there’s the autoimmune disorders too. This was the first diagnosis I got post HPV shot. sciencedirect.com/science/articl… x.com/drsuzanneh7/st… 2/7 Autoimmune disorders and HPV vaccination. Not good. childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hpv-v…