The name "California" originates from the Spanish novel, "Las Sergas de Esplandián" by Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo, published in 1510.

Through this novel, it is mentioned the fabulous island of California, located "to the right of the Indies", and populated only by warrior women and governed by Queen Calafia.

When Spanish explorers arrived on the western coast of North America, they believed that the Baja California Peninsula was an island, like the one described in the novel, and in this manner, the explorers adopted the name “California” to refer to the region. An excerpt from the novel, where California is first mentioned. The English translation, as it appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in March 1864:

Know, then, that, on the right hand of the Indies, there is an island called California, very close to the side of the Terrestrial Paradise, and it was peopled by black women, without any man among them, for they lived in the fashion of Amazons.

They were of strong and hardy bodies, of ardent courage and great force. Their island was the strongest in all the world, with its steep cliffs and rocky shores.

Their arms were all of gold, and so was the harness of the wild beasts which they tamed and rode. For, in the whole island, there was no metal but gold.

On July 7, 1520 (Julian calendar date) the Battle of Otumba took place.

The most decisive battle of the Conquest of Mesoamerica.

Hernán Cortés alongside a few hundred Spaniards and Tlaxcaltecas defeated a large Aztec army of 100,000 men.

Cortés’ forces consisted of approximately 500 Spanish soldiers 1000 Tlaxcaltecas, and 22 horses.

The Spanish-Tlaxcalteca historian Diego Muñoz Camargo shares that the Spanish woman María de Estrada "fought with a lance on horseback as if she were one of the bravest men in the world."

Hernán Cortés himself was seriously wounded with "two stones" to the head the day before the battle.

According to Cortés, "a large number of Indians came out to meet them, so many that, in front, on either side or behind, no part of the fields that could be seen was empty of them."

The Spaniards commended themselves "to God and Saint Mary with all their hearts, invoking the name of...Lord Santiago." Bernal Díaz del Castillo recounts that "no such large number of warriors had been seen or found together in all the Indies in any battle that had ever taken place; because there was the flower of Mexico, Tezcuco, and Salcocán.”

During the French Revolution, there was a push to replace the established Catholic faith with new civic religions.

As France fell into this madness using the Revolution, on June 8, 1794, Maximilien François Marie Isidore de Robespierre inaugurated the French Revolution's new state religion, the Cult of the Supreme Being.

The Cult of the Supreme Being was a short-lived, deistic religion with the main mission to replace Roman Catholicism.

The cult was later officially banned by Napoleon Bonaparte. 

The illustration is a depiction of the Festival of the Supreme Being in 1794. Do you notice the symbolism at the top? The Supreme Being movement was not the revolution’s first attempt to replace Catholicism.

In 1793, radical journalist Jacques Hébert and his followers founded the Cult of Reason, in essence, an atheist church, in which its advocates denied the existence of any deity or supernatural forces

It is said that the name Rus’ comes from the name of the Sarmatian tribe Roxolani. But the link in history travels to the Ukrainian Cossacks, like an invisible thread.

The Rus’ people were the remaining Roxolani who settled “on an island” between the Dnipro, the Ros and Tiasmyn rivers in ancient times.

But who were the Sarmatians?

The Sarmatians were a group of Iranian peoples, famous for inventing the military tactics of heavily armed armored cavalry, known as cataphracts, which was the first European precursor of the medieval knights.

The Roman historian Tacitus described them as the best horsemen in the world. 

The Sarmatians were also closely related to the Scythians, sharing similar origins and cultural aspects, being the Scythians a declining (I prefer evolution) force in the face of the Sarmatians' westward migration and military expansion. 

To explain it as simply as possible, the Scythians were dominant earlier, while the Sarmatians rose to prominence later, but in reality, it was more of a change of names and evolution of one tribe into another.

Herodotos shares that Sarmatians:

‘Were originally Scythians mixed with Amazons. They speak Scythian, but ungrammatically, because the Amazons never learned it properly. The women go to war, ride out hunting, and wear the same clothes as men. Before a woman can marry, she must kill a man of the enemy. ‘

Later, the Sarmatians' historical presence in the same region as the Cossacks and their known nomadic lifestyle have served as evidence that the Cossacks are descended from Sarmatian groups. The Cossacks may as well be linked in part to the Scythians, by sharing some geographical connections and a common history in the Eurasian Steppe. Ethnic map of the Caucasus in the 5th and 4th centuries BC.

The Cuera, which gave them their name, was a leather jacket, like a coat without sleeves, proof against the Indians' arrows except at very close range. For additional armor they had shields and chaps. The shields, carried on the left arm, were made of two plies of bull's hide, and would turn either arrow or spear. The leather chaps or aprons, fastened to the pommel of the saddle, protected legs and thighs from brush and cactus spines.

What we now know as The United States of America was still part of the Spanish Empire, including the Rocky Mountains, Montana, Dakota and even Alaska, where it bordered Russia.

Before the cowboys and the American cavalry ever came to life, about 253 years ago, The Soldados de Cuera, or "leather-jacket soldiers” came to be.

The cavalry of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, the Leather Dragons, the presidial soldiers. The soldiers of the Spanish Empire in the Wild West. Made entirely from bronze, artist Buck McCain depicts a Spanish Presidio guard.

165 W. Alameda St. (El Presidio Park, 165 W. Alameda St.)

A Week of Brutal Bolshevik Massacres.

It was the year 1941, and the order came from Joseph Stalin himself. In it, the NKVD was instructed to “remove” the prison population in the USSR’s occupied territories. A time when the Soviet Secret Police brutally murdered 100,000 political prisoners, and it only took them one week.

Doctors, engineers, lawyers, journalists, artists, university professors, teachers, merchants, and farmers were massacred rather than allowed to fall into German hands.

“It was as if the herald of death had appeared in our cell, and we had heard his message.”

Shared Bodhan Kazanivs’kyi, a survivor of 1941 prison massacres. Kazanivs’kyi also described seeing groups of prisoners taken to the prison basement and then hearing their screams as they were tortured before they were shot.

In the central prison in the city of Lutsk, inmates were called by name into the courtyard and lined up. NKVD officers then threw grenades at the group while Soviet tanks fired machine guns.

Those incarcerated in the prison of Dubno, located in the Rivne oblast, were shot and stabbed with bayonets while they slept.

In Sambir, a city located to the southwest of L’viv, the NKVD blew up cells filled with approximately 1,200 female prisoners.

In the city of Ivano-Frankivsk, three basement cells had been stacked to the ceiling with 2,500 dead bodies.

In the NKVD investigative prison in L’viv, the victims were thrown, dead or alive, into basement cells, locked the doors, and set fire to the building.

In the Tartu prison, 250 political prisoners were shot in cold blood.

In the Kharkiv tragedy, NKVD officers burned alive 1,200 political prisoners. The prison was located on Chernyshevsky Street in Kharkiv, Ukraine.

And many more…

Medical students describing the scene at one of the prisons:

"From the courtyard, doors led to a large space, filled from top to bottom with corpses...Among them were many women. On the left wall, three men were crucified, barely covered by clothing from their shoulders, with severed male organs. Underneath them on the floor in half-sitting, leaning positions – two nuns with those organs in their mouths...most were stabbed in the stomach with a bayonet. Some were naked or almost naked, others in decent street clothes. One man was in a tie, mostly likely just arrested." A Lviv resident tries to find relatives among those killed in the yard of the Lviv prison.

On the matters of Casual anti-Semitism

The more one digs into the national myth of Winston Churchill, the more comes to light the rollercoaster side of his personality.

It seems that the man had no real principles, no ideology, and no moral code to follow, and instead, he switched his philosophical beliefs and views at convenience.

One noticeable shift was the back and forth between antisemitism and pro-Zionism, contradicting his statements throughout the years. Let’s explore some events.

The Churchill of 1920, specifically after WWI saw himself as terrorized by jewish revolutionaries. Through his article of February 8, 1920, entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” We can witness a glimpse at the struggle.

“And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical…
…This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs.
Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth
Century; and now at last this band of
extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire… There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual
bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical
Jews…”

On a side note, Spartacus-Weishaupt is actually Adam Weishaupt.

Sir Martin Gilbert (Goldberg) Winston Churchill's official biographer, expanded:

“Churchill was a ferocious advocate of intervention to quell the Russian Revolution, and wrote furiously about the dangers of the ‘International Jews.’

Churchill then expressed in 1935 that he “disliked Hitler’s system” but “admired his patriotic achievement” and “his long weary battle for the German heart,” admiring and supporting from the shadows, a war of annihilation against “Jewish-Bolshevism.”

Churchill became an advocate of rearmament, who wanted to be on Hitler’s side in his war against Soviet-Bolshevik Russia.

During the Spanish Civil War, Churchill considered the Republic a “communist front” and the Hitler-backed Fascists as a beautifully perfect “Anti-red movement.”

In his 1937 book Great Contemporaries, a collection of 25 essays about famous people, he wrote referring to Adolf: “If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as admirable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.“

Through Italy’s Fascism, Churchill believed Mussolini to be a good ruler for the land, and fascism a useful bulwark against Communism.

Historian Paul Addison shares that
“With fascism as such . . . he had no quarrel. In February 1933 he praised Mussolini . . . as ‘the greatest lawgiver among men” going as far as to thank Mussolini for “rendered a service to the world” in his war against communism.

Follow the 🧵 below… 2. When visiting Italy in 1927, he also declared: “If I had been an Italian, I am sure I should have been wholehearted with you from the start to finish in your triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism.”

The historian Joanna Bourke shares Churchill’s appeal to Mussolini in May 1940:

“Is it too late to stop a river of blood from flowing between the British and the Italian peoples? . . . Down the ages above all other calls comes the cry that the joint heirs of Latin and Christian civilization must not be ranged against one another in mortal strife. Hearken to it, I beseech you in all honor and respect before the dread signal is given.”

In the same year, 1940, Churchill offers remarks on the figure of Francisco Franco:

“British interests and policy are based on the independence and unity of Spain and we look forward to seeing her take her rightful place both as a great Mediterranean Power and as a leading and famous member of the family of Europe and Christendom.”

After the war, and as prime minister beginning in 1951, Churchill maintained most of the reforms implemented by Labour, a jewish-Communist party which to this day is destroying the UK.

It is important to notice that once Churchill turned his views on fascism in a 180-degree move, the great majority of bombs he sent against Germany were aimed at and fell on residential areas, rather than the strategic infrastructure. This strangely resembles the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, bombs that fell on predominantly Catholic areas.

It seems that there was a Churchill before the war, and a Churchill after the war. For the man, basically, fascism only became a real problem when he saw a threat against the Rothschild banks.

On the issue of jewish Tribalism.

The next post is not against the jews. I (somehow) applaud the jews, mostly because they have successfully achieved the most effective global brainwashing campaign, ever imagined.

Why do I applaud this? Because they are simply looking after their people. I applaud this because they are looking after their Tribe.

But, here is where it becomes an issue, I don’t belong to that Tribe. This issue grows exponentially when those who don’t belong to that Tribe cheer for the success of the Tribe.

This is the problem with the Judeo-Christian, or most recently the Zionist-Christian.

The problem, in part, resides in the effective global brainwashing mentioned above. The jews, especially after 1945, have captured and controlled every aspect of the media, entertainment, and education institutions.

Imagine what would happen if, from birth, one gets bombarded with “facts” throughout all institutions. Schools, entertainment, history… repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.

Going back to this Judeo-Christian, and Zionist-Christian, the major obstacle I see among these self-declared jewish-tribe followers is that they haven’t read the Bible at all.

Most people read the Bible when they are young, having not the necessary level of comprehension to go through it, to then never read it again. Most people don’t ever read the Bible, and all the knowledge of it, they get through sermons at Church.

This is a major complication. Several huge misconceptions come with this issue, misconceptions which are then promoted hard by the self-proclaimed Zionists that are not jewish at all. To keep it short, let me share two.

The first is the idea that jews are the Chosen People. This is simply a misinterpretation of the concept of “Chosen” and this misinterpretation comes mostly from, of course, not reading the Bible.

See, jews are (or were) the Chosen People, but not in a good way. Throughout the entire Bible, God chose leaders among the Tribe, to test the Tribe the same way God tested Adam and Eve. What we then see is the Tribe repeatedly ignoring the Chosen leader, abandoning God, and spewing on the rules and laws. Many times even the Chosen leaders do this as well.

What happened with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ was a parallel of both the expulsion from paradise of Adam & Eve and Noah’s flood. God tested the Tribe, and the Tribe failed, miserably. The Christ event effectively became the Last Strike for the Tribe.

As a consequence, God abandoned the jewish Tribe and started the process anew. Reason for the expansion of the knowledge to the Gentiles. Reason for the rejection of Jesus Christ as the Messiah from the jewish people.

The second misconception is that Israel belongs to the jews. Abraham wasn’t a jew in the modern concept of jewish people. Abraham was a Hebrew. Abraham wasn’t born or didn’t come from Israel. Abraham was born and lived in the city of Ur in Chaldea (modern-day Iraq) and he came out of Ur towards Canaan, the land of the Canaanites (Israel)

Abraham’s most important instruction was to NOT mix with the Canaanites, a mission which of course, his followers ignored along the way.

Misconceptions as these two previously mentioned are many. But the world goes around on the path of ignorance, and this ignorance is used as a tool of manipulation by the Tribe.

This ignorance is exactly the mechanism used to manipulate people in favor of Zionism. This Zionism is simply jewish Nationalism. In the same way, German Nationalists declared the right to a land for a tribe, the jewish people are now declaring the right to a land for a tribe. The issue is that people who don’t belong to this tribe think that they belong to this tribe, and then they act as if they belong to this tribe.

Continue the thread below 🧵… Going back to the Tribalism issue, this post came to life because of a wonderful share from @ashalogos that caught my attention. In it, Asha exposes the jewish-tribal issue in Europe, in four points.

Through this share, we can notice one of the most common jewish tribal behavior. They are invited into a country, just right after they were expelled from another country, to then destroy that country from within, in favor of their tribe, to once again get expelled, and later do the same, while they claim victimhood.

It is an endless circle in which the major player is the ignorance of history by the people accepting in the tribe.

The first of these four points was that of the Spain tragedy. I argued that for me, it has become extremely difficult to teach people about the issue because even when I expose people to the Spain issue, which is closely related to my ancestry, the people mostly end up in denialism. So, why would I even take the task to go through three more points?

This demonstrates that it is not a censorship problem. History is widely available. Books are widely available. The knowledge is at the reach of a click. It is mostly a denialism and self-inflicted ignorance type of situation. The world has not only forgotten the past, the world has also forgotten what it has forgotten.

Of course, the main issue with this Tribalism is that we are now starting to live it through Europe, and America, which makes it reason number two for this post. It is a warning from those who know towards those who don’t want to know.

To conclude this extensive post, I would like to share pieces from three important men from the past. Unfortunately, even when wise men spoke loudly (and still do) their knowledge remains out of reach of the modern man, due to majorly, self-inflicted ignorance.

*I am sharing the quotes through screenshots because the Chosenites at X didn’t like it.

Religion is enemy number one of the Communist cult, because religion means there’s someone (or something) above the Communist leader.
Lenin said that Orthodox Christianity, ironically the mostly prevalent among the peasant population and the exploited working class, had to be eradicated completely in order for the class struggle to succeed.

Karl Marx said that “religion is the opium of the people” and "the soul of soulless conditions."
Marx considered religions and churches as “organs of bourgeois reaction" used for "the exploitation and the stupefaction of the working class" and declared that “Communism begins where atheism begins.”

Stalin definitely took it to the next level, by enforcing militant atheism, and only during the purges of 1936 and 1937, tens of thousands of clergy were imprisoned and shot on the grounds of being anti-revolutionaries.

The new “socialist man,” was an atheist one, said Stalin, while launching The “Godless Five-Year Plan.”

By 1939, only 200 churches remained open, out of about 46,000, and those 200 churches were controlled by clergies who remained sympathetic to the communist cult.

Among the most beautiful churches destroyed and demolished during the Stalin’s Communist nightmare, just to name five:

Church of St. Euplus, destroyed in 1926 under the pretext of building a Palace of Trusts.

Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Pokrovka, demolished in 1936, despite that many architects and art conservators campaigned to preserve it.

Church of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker in Stolpy, demolished in 1938

Church of Cosmas and Damian in Nizhnye Sadovniki, demolished in 1938.

St. Michael's Lutheran Church, demolished in 1928 to build an aviation institute. Poster depicting Jesus as a capitalist hawking his wares. The caption reads, 'Under the shop window this weasel has set himself up nicely. There's a foolish fashion that means they'll snap his junk right up'

Everyone knows about the Tank Man photo, or I must say, the cropped version of it. This one that I am sharing is the real, unedited version. This one that I am sharing is the photo of the Chinese man who stood in front of a column of Type 59 tanks leaving Tiananmen Square.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… British ambassador to China Sir Alan Donald wrote a secret diplomatic cable around 24 hours after the massacre, which was declassified in 2017, sharing that at least 10,000 people were killed.