I watched part of a video by a local left wing influencer saying how we can’t possibly know the political leanings of the Charlie Kirk shooter, and it’s not appropriate to go on about it. To us who face crazy aggressive trans-activists, it matters. 1/

https://twitter.com/mrandyngo/status/1967631840338153781

We want the state to stop feeding the fiction that “trans people” are a real class of people and are victims of discrimination. What “trans” is, is a violent group of activists. We have been sharing evidence of this for some time, 2/

In light of the comments by the Victorian Premier @JacintaAllanMP about the existence of “trans children” and their propensity to take their own lives, I thought I should post this article I wrote two years ago about the fact that top psychiatrists know that the 1/ “Affirmation model”, including the idea that there is a type of true “trans child”, has no evidentiary basis. despite being promoted by state government paid doctors who are commissioned to set up gender clinics, like Dr Stephen Stathis 2/

That’s right ladies, the people who administer the main legal mechanism designed to protect the female sex from the only other sex, in Australia, declared that when a woman is confronted with a naked man, unknown to her, in a public space designated for same sex changing, 1/

https://twitter.com/msediewyatt/status/1952607727089521145

showering and toileting, she cannot act to protect herself on the basis of sex, because she is not legally permitted to determine that sex under the SD Act. Both the counsel for the SDC and the head judge in #GiggleVTickle highlighted that the very idea that a woman could 2/

The thing with lawfare (tribunals/ commissions/ court cases) in relation to gender identity, for me, is that they are not only to change the law but to raise awareness and to test the operation of the law. People argue about the effective use of crowdfunded money and how it 1/ may be better spent, but I don’t (usually). I would never criticise Sall Grover, Amy Hamm,Maya Forstater, Alison Bailey, etc. in relation to the outcome or process of challenging the law, because it’s the law that’s the problem.They are demonstrating how gender identity in the 2/

The political advisor of Genspect denies that women and girls require protection in law as a sex, because she claims they are not structurally vulnerable to oppression. Here is the problem with that. 1/

https://twitter.com/elegationvain/status/1936830314384630045

Even before female enfranchisement, poor girls and women were being trafficked into sex slavery everywhere. Women, most of them Christian, worked to enshrine principles on law, including age of consent and respect for sexual boundaries that made certain sexual exploitation 2/

I actually understand why some on our own side have gone insane. We have been up against the most stupid arguments possible for years. And those dumb arguments have been accepted by government. Here are some of the most stupid ones. Feel free to add… 1/ Men turn into women with a declaration and are then free of male pattern violence and male pattern sexual deviance.

Everyone is born with a sexed soul that must be affirmed over the sex of the body or the person will die.

Transgenderism is innate like left-handedness. 2/

Feminism is on its own side. As soon as you team the interests of women with any group of men, you stop centring women.
If feminism is the political action of women for the interests of girls and women, it has to just be that. 1/ In that vein, to do feminism you have to see women as a political class, this class has to be exclusively female, but this is just the starting block. To take feminism as a form of political analysis to broader issues you have to show how an issue affects women and girls 2/

Last week @JohnPesutto took the stand to attempt to defend his defamation of @MoiraDeemingMP by insisting he was reflecting and reacting to her irredeemably tarnished reputation in the party for “giving succour to hateful and/or extreme social and or political views” 1/13 The judge interjected to challenge Pesutto and I took some time to rewind the live feed and transcribe, because I enjoyed it very much. Now you can enjoy it.
HH - His Hon Justice O'Callaghan
JP - John Pesutto
SC - Senior Counsel Sue Chrysanthou
2/

I’m further down the gender rabbit hole than most, here’s why:🧵 Once you realise that gender dysphoria entered into the DSM the same year that Gillard amended the Sex Discrimination Act, to effectively include a group of medically diagnosed men into the class of women, 1/8

https://twitter.com/christinerebst1/status/1831506044629156124

you realise this diagnosis of gender dysphoria effectively takes the pathology from the patient and places it on the population, deeming populations sick for recognising human sex categories as unchangeable. Once you see this you realise this is a bullshit diagnosis 2/

Morning fellow #xx chromosome bigots. These articles are exactly three years apart. Three years ago I thought that when people saw this, they would understand the damage of erasing sex in law, but this is what I have learned in three years.
1/8 First! This is not happening!Governments are not really erasing sex categories in law,
and even if they are
women are not being left unprotected,
and even if they are
trans identified males are no threat to women,
and even if they are
Women have to learn to adjust to 2/8

Very middle class to declare feminism something that one does as a life practice and occupation, while slighting women who have normal jobs and families and spend their spare time in state and corporate resistance doing work that is never seen, that will never be in history, 1/

https://twitter.com/bindelj/status/1809600452712911195

nor be written about in media. Such women ask that we maintain a picket line on language, they actively pressure leaders, sometimes from anonymous accounts, to hold the line on language to maintain protest for them in the words they give to men. These women are coerced at work,2/

Moira highlights that Respectful Relationship content will trigger sexual trauma in children. Rainbow Families and Our Watch know the content will trigger sexual trauma and they do so to "out" the child as a sexual abuse victim in a “safe” institutional environment. 1/6 By doing so they grossly underestimate the consequences of a child revealing criminal offenses within their family and the consequences of that on their food and housing security, and the child’s emotional well being. 2/6

Let me tell you this story of a long time mutual follow blocking me. Yesterday Colin’s girlfriend @buttonslives said that I was being unfollowed by the GC elite, not because of my political possitions but because of my personality 1/ It didn’t go that well for her but still it was a slight on my character not based on anything I’ve said. 2/

I’ve just heard that sharing this is something that is being “done to Stella”. It is clear to me that Stella is actively distancing herself from some GC feminist perspectives. Specifically that the public performance of paraphilias is harmful to women and especially lesbians. 1/

https://twitter.com/iseult/status/1756294068311662948

This video is being shown in context of this political point. The video is seen as displaying a kind of both-sideism, a plea for compassion and understanding of men using a comparative type of lesbian sexuality. I am not a lesbian but to me the politics is very obvious. 2/

What is hard line on pronouns? In the world of compelled speech pronouns have become a flashpoint. Hardline GCs have drawn a kind of picket line over them on X. Let’s remember that this the biggest social media platform GCs can organise on. 1/ So using female pronouns for a man is a kind of crossing of the picket line. The GCs won’t come to your house and scream “scab, scab, scab”. They will make a comment under whatever place the infraction has taken place and say “stop this sort of thing”. If these comments 2/

I don’t care why men exhibit abnormal or deviant sexual behaviour. My only interest in the public performance of feminine stereotypes by men is political and cultural, ie. women’s right legally and women’s rights to express cultural boundaries. 1/ The dress is the most stereotypical feminine clothing. It’s disingenuous to say that religious robes, kilts, Tongan sarong etc are the same as the dress that you purchase from the women’s section of a fashion outlet because clothing is culturally specific and it is political. 2/

Overcoming the social mind virus that has been planted by billions of dollars with false rights is not going to be easy, because people enjoy competing for the social capital withe the acceptance of more and more improbable identity claims. 1/ It’s like a human rights cosplay where they can purchase Martin Luther King type social capital for the bargain basement price of a 99c rainbow lanyard or for fee in the shaming of a colleague who doesn’t declare pronouns 2/

So many people repeat the line that “religious extremism is bad everywhere” and they will say “even Christian extremism.” By doing so people equate Islamic terrorist organisations with the local head covering Brethren, and it’s such a stupid thing to do. Joining the mechanism 1/ of the state to religious aims, that include the inhalation or conversion of entire nations of people, is the kind of doctrine that significantly reduces populations in brutal ways that we have all seen before. Palestine will never be free under an Islamist regime 2/

I got a reply from @MissionAust that could have been automated, and it caused me to reflect on the state of Christian organisations that are founded in the service of God and now lap at the government trough that is increasingly captured by a false religion 1/ Mission Australia base their ideology in Matt 25: 35-40, a scripture that bounds believers like myself to the service of humanity “when I was hungry” Jesus will tell us on entering paradise “you gave me food, and when I was thirsty, you gave me water.” 2/

When people compromise the public safety of women and girls by saying that we are in greatest danger in the home, they are doing something very sinister. 1/

https://twitter.com/9newsmelb/status/1649217851751010304

The public safety of women and girls has long been a feminist pursuit, from female public toilets only last century to reclaim the night when I was young. 2/ peril.com.au/back-editions/…

I can’t believe how many “centrists” now tell me, as an argument against feminism, that men and women are different. What in earth do they think feminism has been doing if we don’t know men and women are different. 1/ Hundreds of years of activism, lives sacrificed, the fucking abuse we get, what people say about us in the street and in the parliament, the loss of career opportunities what we face to call ourselves gender critical feminists, and the men, who are supposed to be “on our side” 2/