Dr. Neha Das Profile picture
Indian | Hindu | Karna Kayastha | Unreserved | Against reservation & fake activism! Views are personal. नील-मानव, समाजवाद प्रचारक - कृपया दूर रहें🙏
4 subscribers
Jun 23 7 tweets 5 min read
"Where is casteism?"

Here👇
1. In 99.1% of villages, higher caste dalits don't marry with lower dalit castes!

2. 88% higher caste dalits do not eat/drink in lower caste dalit homes!

(Findings from a 2011 study conducted by Robert F Kennedy centre for Justice & Human rights) Image
Image
Image
Here is casteism👇

Intercaste marriages opposed between SC and ST, even resulting in honor killing!! Image
Image
Image
May 17 10 tweets 5 min read
People ask how common is misuse of SC/ST act?

Here is some data👇
1. In 2016, 8900 cases filed under SC/ST act, were found to be fake! Image 2. 70-100% cases filed under SC/ST act, in different states, in different time-frames, were found to be fake👇 Image
Image
Image
Apr 12 8 tweets 5 min read
"ज्योतिबा ईसाई बन चुके हैं! हमको शर्म आती है कि ऐसा धर्मद्रोही हमारे परिवार में जन्मा, जिसने हमारे देवताओं का अपमान किया है"
-ये बाबूराव फुले (ज्योतिबा फुले के भाई के पोते) का भाषण है, जो उन्होंने पुणे मुनिसिपल्टी मीटिंग में दिया था (जो 8 सितंबर, 1925 को केसरी अखबार में छपा था) Image
Image
अपनी पुस्तक "गुलामगिरी" में ज्योतिराव फुले ने ब्रह्मा के बारे में बहुत ही अभद्र बातें लिखी हैं!
इसी किताब में देवी गायत्री को "यावनी (outsider non indian women)", ब्राह्मण को "भाटमुल्ला", भगवान विष्णु के वामन अवतार को "बंब्या (illiterate)", "घातकी (one who deceives)", "लबाड (Liar)" और "कृतघ्न (ungrateful)" बताया गया है!Image
Image
Mar 15 4 tweets 3 min read
"ब्राह्मण यूरेशिया से आये हैं"
-राजद नेता यदुवंश यादव

अब इन लालटेनियों को कौन समझाए कि ब्राह्मणों से ज़्यादा R1A1 gene तो अहीरों में मिला है!
इतना ही नहीं, कुछ दलित और आदिवासी जातियों में R1a1 gene, ब्राह्मणों के बराबर या उनसे ज़्यादा ही पाया गया है!

तो सबको यूरेशिया भेज दें?😂 Image रिसर्च डेटा (R1a1 gene%)👇
-अहीर (OBC)-63%
-लोहाना (OBC)-60%
-उत्तरप्रदेश के ब्राह्मण-49%
-महाराष्ट्र ब्राह्मण-43%
-पासवान (SC)-41%
-गुर्जर (OBC)-41%
-कथौड़ी (ST)-40%
-जाटव (SC)-40%
-मीणा (ST)-38%
-मध्यप्रदेश ब्राह्मण-38%
-पंजाब ब्राह्मण-36%
-वाल्मीकि (SC)-33%
-रबाड़ी (ST)-32%
-मेघवाल (SC)-30%
-मेयो (OBC)-31%
-Iyengar ब्राह्मण-31%
-गुजरात के ब्राह्मण-31% or 19%
-कश्मीरी पंडित-19%Image
Image
Feb 26 6 tweets 3 min read
How Ambedkarite literature & handles are spreading fake information & hate(🧵)

Ambedkarite book's explanation on Hindu festivals 👇
1. Gudi-Padwa:
"Brahmins killed Sambhaji Maharaj, decapitated him & hung his head on a spear"

2. Holi:
"Holika was gang-r*ped by brahmins & burnt alive"
-"Vishnu was a cunning brahmin"
-"Hirankashyap was a Buddhist"

There are many such absurd claims in this book, which are not only fake but also designed to spread hate against Hinduism, esp brahmins!!Image
Image
Image
Image
Remember:
This absurd book has no sources or facts backing it's claims. Just writers own stories!

But the Ambedkarite-Buddhist YouTube channel named "Science Journey" showcases this book as "scientific research" & makes a video claiming same stories in the book as facts👇 Image
Feb 18 6 tweets 2 min read
2013-2016 UPSC data analysis of ST seats shows monopoly of Meenas in ST reservation👇

Remember:
Meena population in India is ~0.35% (~6% in Rajasthan), but they occupy 70%-90% of ST seats.

If reservation is for representation, why not apply "jitni aabadi, utna haq" logic here? Image This is UPSC APFC result 👇
12 out of 12 ST seats were taken by Meenas,,which is 100% reservation!!

That's not over-representation,, that's monopoly.
What about representation of other ST communities?? Image
Feb 7 12 tweets 6 min read
How fake discrimination stories are created-A 🧵

1-An MP is lying in parliament that his nomination papers were not taken bcoz he was a dalit!

Reality?
-The seat is reserved for SC, all MP candidates are dalits
-His pic submitting nomination papers are still on his FB account😂 Image Here is Mr. MP submitting his nomination paper 👇
Probably he forgot to delete it before lying in parliament 😂

He is London educated, his father was also an MLA. He is rich & comes from privileged family. Still he had to lie.
Why?
-Bcoz discrimination sells! So ppl create it. Image
Jan 28 28 tweets 12 min read
Ppl are talking about misuse of SC/ST act, after Infosys co-founder is booked under it.

But ordinary ppl have been facing this draconian act since many years.

Many families were destroyed, many lives were ruined.

& Many innocent lives were lost due to this barbaric law (A 🧵) Image
Image
Image
Image
A 25-yr old Chartered accountant Rakshit Khandelwal committed suicide in Jaipur after his mother was trapped in false case under SC-ST Act.

The young man was going through a difficult time as a person named Bhim Singh had filed a false case against his mother under the SC-ST Atrocity Act. He was emotionally attached to his mother and hence, was bothered by his mother’s plight. He was disturbed to the extent of committing suicide.

“In this world, powerful people suppress middle-class people like us. A person named Bhim Singh has filed a false case of 420 against my family. He registered a case in Jaipur and Bharatpur. I cannot see my family in such a worried state We are not criminals”, said his suicide note. He further writes that Singh is being supported by Bharatpur DCP Satish Verma. His letter noted that the police was harassing them by sending teams repeatedly.Image
Jan 11 7 tweets 5 min read
Just Imagine-
From just 1 line, in 1 letter-
"Fatima will be overburdened but hopefully she won't do kur-kur",
an entire character was created!

Articles were written, then books!

Her background/family life/even love-interest was invented.

All from 1 line!

This is how fake history is created!Image
Image
Image
Image
Who created this character is a question!
Dilip Mandal didn't create it,, but he certainly brought this fake character into limelight.
There's no evidence of "Fatima-the 1st muslim teacher"-neither in Phule's works, nor in any other contemporary writings.
1st mention of Fatima comes from this 1986 book-a picture and some lines on Fatima Sheikh.
But there is no primary source evidence on existence of this character, & noone knows from where the writer got this information 👇Image
Image
Jan 10 26 tweets 7 min read
Debunking the following fake historical oppression stories: A master 🧵

-Breast Tax
-Jhadu Matki
-Bhima Koregaon
-No Education to Shudra/Dalit
-No Shudra/Dalit Pujari

Big Thanks to all who contributed to debunking all these claims🙏

Save this 🧵 for future references. Breast Tax
Thread 1-By @dintentdata
Jan 6 8 tweets 3 min read
अंबेडकर सावरकर को पसंद नहीं करते थे!
सावरकर अंबेडकर को पसंद नहीं करते थे!
सरदार पटेल, सावरकर और अंबेडकर, दोनों को ही पसंद नहीं करते थे!

मतलब कि ये कन्फ्यूज्ड सदी है, किसी की ideology का अता-पता ही नहीं!!
😂😂😂 1956 में केसरी के एक लेख में, सावरकर ने अंबेडकर के बारे में कहा:
"अंबेडकर बौद्ध इसलिए नहीं बने क्योंकि उनको बौध्द धर्म में श्रद्धा है, बल्कि इसलिए बने क्योंकि उनके अंदर एक हिंदू राष्ट्र घातक राजनीतिक आकांक्षा है, जिससे वो ये सोचते हैं कि अगर बुद्धिस्ट ज़्यादा होंगे तो उनको अलग बुद्धिस्ट राष्ट्र बनाने का मौका मिल सकता है"Image
Jan 3 11 tweets 5 min read
क्या आप जानते हैं?
-ज्योतिराव फुले ने "मानव मोहम्मद" नामक एक कविता लिखी थी, जिसमें मोहम्मद की तारीफ की थी?

कविता का मराठी से हिंदी अनुवाद👇
"मोहमंद एक असली मर्द था संसार के लिए त्याग किया।
सत्य के लिए त्याग दिया।
सबको समझाया कि खोटा (झूठा) धर्म छोड़ो। इसका जन्म इसलिए हुआ था।
जग के हित के लिए लिखा कुरान
कोई भेद नहीं ..सभी मानव हैं।
उसने मूर्ति पूजकों एवम् मूर्ति को नष्ट किया।
सभी ढोंगीयों को सिखाया।
ईसा की ओर झुकाया।
देव एक है ऐसा ग्रंथ स्थापित किया...जग बन्धुत्व के लिए... मनुजो के लिए।"

Source: ज्योति फुले वांग्मय, पृष्ठ 607Image
Image
अपनी किताब "ग़ुलामगिरी" में ज्योतिराव फुले ने लिखा है:
1. ब्राह्मण ईरान से आये थे।
2. भगवान परशुराम ने महारों को मार डाला और उन्होंने महार और मांग महिलाओं के गले में खौलता हुआ तेल और सिन्दूर डाल दिया। यह तब तक जारी रहा जब तक मुस्लिम शक्तियों ने इसे बंद नहीं कर दिया। Image
Image
Jan 2 14 tweets 9 min read
Rahul Chakraborty (aka Rahulseeker) has made a post full with lies & misinformation!

Facts:
1. BAPS case turned out to be fake-No caste discrimination

2. CISCO case turned out to be fake-no caste discrimination

3. Rohit Vemula was not even a dalit, his death wasn't related to caste discrimination

4. Equality Labs is a dubious anti-hindu hate organization with ISI/Jamaat/khalistani links--most of their data has been discredited. Same about Aisha Wahab

5. 80% Indian-Americans are general category, 19% are OBC. Only 1% are SC/ST. Plus most of them do not identity with caste.
So caste discrimination angle is totally fake

6. In India also, only 1% of total crimes are against SC/ST. Out of that, 90% are committed by ppl from same communities/not caste related. In remaining 10% cases under SC/ST act, ~85% are filed against OBCs. So out of 100 cases against SC/ST, only 1.5 are actually committed by GC/UC!

So get educated Mr. Rahul Chakraborty!!
& STOP LYING!!! Now let's debunk his lies one by one.

Case 1.
The case of alleged caste-discrimination by BAPS Swaminarayan temple authorities turned out to be completely fake!
The Artisans who filed the case later withdrew it, claiming they were misled by activist & their lawyer with promises of US citizenship and money!

The artisans later said:
"Swati Sawant, their lawyer, repeatedly intimidated & threatened them to file fake case of caste-discrimination.
Swati Sawant, encouraged them to falsify allegations, with promises of U.S. citizenship & money."Image
Image
Image
Jan 1 11 tweets 9 min read
#गद्दार_दिवस
जानिये भीमा-कोरेगांव की असल सच्चाई जो आपको बताई नहीं गई👇
1. यह लड़ाई मराठा साम्राज्य के पेशवा गुट और ब्रिटिश ईस्ट इंडिया कंपनी के बीच हुई थी

2. इस लड़ाई में ब्रिटिश सेना जीती नहीं थी. सच्चाई ये है कि किसी भी पक्ष को कोई निर्णायक जीत हासिल नहीं हुई. ब्रिटिश सेना वापस सेरूर लौट गयी (वहीं से जहाँ से उन्होंने शुरुआत की थी)

3. दोनों पक्षों की सैन्य संरचना:
-ब्रिटिश पक्ष: 834+ तोप/बंदूकें/अन्य आधुनिक हथियार
-मराठा पक्ष: 1800 सैनिक

4. ब्रिटिश सेना में सिर्फ महार ही शामिल नहीं थे। अन्य जाति/धर्म के सैनिक भी थे

5. पेशवा पक्ष में भी दलित/गैरदलित/मुस्लिम सैनिक शामिल थे

6. महारों ने ब्रिटिश सेना में सिर्फ पैदल सैनिकों के रूप में कार्य किया था। किसी भी महार को ब्रिटिश सेना में कोई प्रमुख पद नहीं दिया गया था

7. 1892 में, अंग्रेजों ने महारों को अपनी सेना में भर्ती करना बंद कर दिया, यह कहते हुए कि "महार एक मार्शल जाति नहीं हैं, बल्कि निचली जाति के untouchables (अस्पर्श्य) हैं"Image 1 जनवरी, 1818 को पेशवा की राजधानी पर हमला करने के इरादे से, ब्रिटिश सैनिकों ने सेरूर से पुणे की ओर मार्च किया।
कोरेगांव में मराठों द्वारा अप्रत्याशित रूप से उन्हें रोक लिया गया। इस लड़ाई में, ब्रिटिश सेना और मराठों- दोनों को हताहत होना पड़ा।
ध्यान दीजिए कि दोनों सेनाओं में दलित/अन्य जाति/मुसलमान/अन्य शामिल थे।
अंततः अंग्रेजों ने अपना पुणे मिशन रद्द कर दिया और सेरूर वापस लौट गये।Image
Image
Image
Jan 1 12 tweets 8 min read
#गद्दार_दिवस
#FakeHistory_BhimaKoregaon
Learn how a myth was turned into history (A🧵)

Facts about Bhima-Koregaon battle👇
1. The battle was between Peshwa faction of the Maratha empire & British East India Company

2. British army DID NOT win. Neither side achieved any decisive victory. British army retreated back to Seroor

3. Battle troops composition:
British side: 834+ artillery
Maratha side: 1800

4. British army didn't entirely consist of Mahars. There were other caste/religion soldiers

5. Peshwa side also consisted of dalits/non-dalits/muslim soldiers

6. Mahars served as foot soldiers in British army. No mahar was given any prominent position in british army

7. In 1892, the British stopped recruiting Mahars in their Army, saying that "Mahars are not a martial race but low caste untouchables"Image On Jan 1, 1818, British troops marched from Seroor towards Pune with an intention to attack the Peshwa capital. They were unexpectedly intercepted by Marathas midway at Koregaon.
In this fight, both the British army, & Marathas (both armies consisting of dalits/other castes/muslims/others), suffered casualties.
Finally British aborted their Pune mission & retreated back to SeroorImage
Image
Image
Dec 29, 2024 7 tweets 5 min read
Ok Mr. Ambedkarite.
Let me explain about this chart to you.
This is NCRB data. NCRB data from 2019-2022 shows:
1. Crimes against SC/ST is just ~1% of total crimes in India (SC/ST population is ~25%)

2.~99% of total crimes in India is against non-SC/ST (their population is ~75%)

3. Crime rates (total as well as individual crimes) of crimes against SC are 15-20 times lower than the national average crime rate

4. Crime rates of crimes against ST are 40-60 times lower than the national average crime rate

5. Only 10% of crimes against SC/ST are filed under SC/ST act.
-That means 90% of crimes against SC/ST are not caste-related/are committed by SC/ST only
-In remaining 10% cases (which are filed under SC/ST act), 81% are filed on OBC, 5% on muslims
Means:
In every 100 crimes against SC/ST, 98.5 are committed by SC/ST/OBC/Muslims!

6. Not to forget, various reports have already suggested that 70-90% cases filed under SC/ST act turn out to be fakeImage
Image
Image
Image
NCRB 2019 data👇
1. Total crime data:
-Total crimes=5156172
-Crimes against SC=45935 (0.9%) {SC population 16.6%}
-Crimes against ST=8257 (0.16%)
{ST population 8.6%}
-Total crimes against SC/ST=54192 (1.05%, SC/ST population is 25%)
--Means ~1% crimes against 25% SC/ST population VS 99% crimes against non-SC/ST population!

2. Crime rate data:
-National crime rate=385.5
-Crime rate against SC=22.8
-Crime rate against ST=7.9
--Means crime rate in SC population is 17 times lower than average national crime rate!
& Crime rate in ST population is 49 times lower than average national crime rate!

3. Real caste based crimes:
-Out of total 45935 crimes against SC population, only 9% cases (4129) were registered under SC/ST act
--Means only 0.08% of total crimes were caste based!
(Note that ~90% crimes against SC population, don't have any caste angle, probably done by people belonging to same communities)
As the reports suggest-70-90% cases under SC/ST act are fake, so out of 4129, only 800 cases may be genuine!

Now think--800 cases in a population of 143 crore!!!Image
Dec 29, 2024 7 tweets 5 min read
ब्रिटिश सरकार ने अपनी शिक्षा व्यवस्था लागू करने से पहले 1828-1833 में पूरे भारत की मौजूदा शिक्षा प्रणाली का सर्वे किया!
उन्होंने पाया कि:
-हर गांव में पाठशाला या गुरुकुल थे! कहीं भी जाति के आधार पर भेदभाव नहीं था
-इन गुरुकुलों में 60-70% छात्र शूद्र और पंचम(दलित) थे
-दलित/शूद्र शिक्षक भी थेImage
Image
Image
Image
Thomas Munro survey (Madras presidency, 1822-26): दक्षिण भारत के गुरुकुलों में शूद्रों/पंचमों की संख्या 60-70% के बीच थी! Image
Dec 29, 2024 22 tweets 9 min read
How SC/ST act has become a weapon to harass people & is being used as a licence to commit crimes---A 🧵

Case 1. An elderly dalit man ₹aped 14 yr old deaf-mute girl. On being caught by police, his family filed SC/ST act on the victim's family Image Case 2. An under age girl is eve-teased daily by a dalit man. When girl's family reached police station to file a complaint against him, accused threatened them with SC/ST act & forced them to compromise Image
Dec 27, 2024 11 tweets 3 min read
Wondering where this hate comes from?

Let's see it's origin (🧵)

"I will not believe in Brahma, Vishnu & Mahesh. Neither would I worship them."
"Hinduism disfavors humanity & impedes the advancement & development of humanity because it is based on inequality."
-Dr. BR Ambedkar "In Hinduism, conscience, reason & independent thinking have no scope for development."
"In the Hindu religion, one cannot have freedom of speech. A Hindu must surrender his freedom of speech."
-Dr. BR Ambedkar
Dec 25, 2024 14 tweets 3 min read
मनुस्मृति के वो श्लोक जिनके बारे में आपको बताया नहीं जाता👇🧵

सत्यं ब्रूयात्प्रियं ब्रूयान्न ब्रूयात्सत्यं अप्रियम् ।
प्रियं च नानृतं ब्रूयादेष धर्मः सनातनः ।।
4/138

यानी
हमें सत्य बोलना चाहिये और प्रिय बोलना चाहिये। कभी भी अप्रिय लगने वाला सत्य नहीं बोलना चाहिये लेकिन प्रिय लगने वाला असत्य भी नहीं बोलना चाहिये।
यही सनातन धर्म है। भद्रं भद्रं इति ब्रूयाद्भद्रं इत्येव वा वदेत् ।
शुष्कवैरं विवादं च न कुर्यात्केन चित्सह ।।
4/139

यानी
मनुष्य के लिये यही उचित है कि वह सर्वदा शुभ
बातें ही कहे। यदि किसी कारणवश अशुभ बात कहनी ही पड़े, तो शिष्ट शब्दों का ही प्रयोग करे तथा किसी व्यक्ति से बिना किसी कारण के वैर या विरोध भी नहीं करे।
Dec 23, 2024 6 tweets 4 min read
Don't want to believe the truth quoted by brahmin & other GC authors??

Then here are the opinions of other dalit leaders on Dr. Ambedkar👇
Will you reject them too??

1. HJ Khandekar (Mahar) opposed Ambedkar's claim to leadership of depressed classes.
He questioned the authority of Dr. Ambedkar to speak for the SC community as a whole.
He said:
"Dr. Ambedkar is the leader of only a small section of Mahars in Bombay & Nagpur. Therefore, he cannot speak on behalf of the whole scheduled caste community."
He also opposed reservation saying it'll lead to more conflicts between caste hindus & dalits.
He said:
"Because of this mentality of Dr Ambedkar, the harijans (dalits) will permanently remain harijans & their position will gradually deteriorate. There are sub-castes within castes among harijans....If election is fought community-wise, then mahars who are 80% will get all votes.. Chamars, bhangis & other sub-castes will not be able to return their representatives in elections because they are minority among harijans. In that case only mahars (a section to which Dr. Ambedkar & I belong), will capture all seats & other harijans will get no seat at all."Image
Image
2. Balakrishna Deorukhar (a Chambhar leader, 1933), said:
"At least, Dr Ambedkar
should have done away with sub-castes
among Harijans before dictating terms to
Mahatmaji." After
Ambedkar's declaration to convert, Deorukhar said: "Conversion will not help Harijans".

3. NS Kajrolkar (a Chambhar leader) asked Ambedkar
not to become a "Lost leader to Harijans".
Said Kajrolkar, "we are shocked at the advice
given to us, Harijans, by our veteran leader
Dr Ambedkar, to abandon the Hindu
religion ... It breaks our hearts to see ...Dr Ambedkar who gave us a prominent lead in the past, should ask us to commit suicide
by abandoning our religion."

4. PN Rajbhoj (another Chambhar leader),
went a step further and said that Ambedkar
was misdirecting his followers. This was
also reported in the Bombay Chronicle of
February 17, 1933. Said Rajbhoj:
"I am not surprised by Dr Ambedkar's
speech as there is nothing new in it ... When ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY March 8-15, 1986
Temple Entry Satyagraha was going on at Nasik some dozen Mahars got themselves
converted into Mahomedans on hearing the
speeches of Dr Ambedkar and his colleagues ... These undesirable elements in Nasik
Satyagraha made me nervous and I severed
mv connection with the Kalaram Temple
Satvagraha ... Dr Ambedkar is not only
misdirecting his followers but also misdirecting his energy, knowledge and leadership
through wrong channels to a waste land."Image
Image