Nikola Jurkovic Profile picture
AI safety researcher
Aug 13 7 tweets 2 min read
A few thoughts on what an exponentially increasing time horizon means for AI R&D automation:

I think a 1-year 50%-time-horizon is very likely not enough to automate AI research, but I also think that AI research is 50% likely to be automated by the end of 2028. The reason I think AI research might be automated by EOY 2028 is because I think the time horizon at that time will be much higher than 1 year (the result of a naive extrapolation from current rates), as the time horizon will increase faster and faster over time. A few reasons:
Aug 9 9 tweets 3 min read
Has AI progress slowed down? I’ll write some personal takes and predictions in this thread.

The main metric I look at is METR’s time horizon, which measures the length of tasks agents can perform. It has been doubling for more than 6 years now, and might have sped up recently. Image By measuring the length of tasks AI agents can complete, we can get a continuous metric of AI capabilities.

Since 2019, the time horizon has been doubling every 7 months. But since 2024, it’s been doubling every 4 months. What if we irresponsibly extrapolated these to 2030? Image