How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/ArmsControlWonk/status/1646638052360572930Solid propellant grain, once cast, is sensitive to humidity/temperature/physical stress (during transport, for instance). That's why large, valuable solid-fuel missiles are canisterized. Over years in storage, solid fuel missiles can degrade. 2/n
One more image. Per North Korean state media, the test was meant to demonstrate a “nuclear counterattack” capability and to “make the enemies suffer from fear and anxiety.”
https://twitter.com/nktpnd/status/1604600012146704386Beginning in 2009, North Korea began to comply with internationally accepted satellite prenotification practices (ICAO, IMO, etc.). Unclear if that practice will resume for a satellite with an ostensible "military" role. voanews.com/a/a-13-2009-03…
Emphasizing negative control is important as KPA moves toward deploying TNWs to "frontline" units (as was decided at last June's WPK CMC meeting): "...adopting important military measures to enhance the operational capabilities of the frontline units" kcnawatch.org/newstream/1656…
Here’s the state media report on this new “secret weapon”. This appears to be something of a North Korean analog to Russia’s Poseidon, but I have ... questions. https://twitter.com/GalloVOA/status/1639015698084265986
The coordinates provided in NK state media correspond to this point. That's an unprecedentedly southeasterly splashdown point for any North Korean missile.
First, it's unprecedented for North Korea to introduce and test a new long-range missile type on a "normal" trajectory; usually, they "loft" their large new missiles (firing them at a sharp angle to reduce demonstrated range). [2/n]
https://twitter.com/nknewsorg/status/1579218841481408512
https://twitter.com/JPN_PMO/status/1577070110430613504On the ICBM possibility.
https://twitter.com/nktpnd/status/1201982627605073921?t=oRTDZIdluW73Il5Y1vauKg&s=19
https://twitter.com/joshjonsmith/status/1568039955649425408


More to say soon! This is all very interesting.
https://twitter.com/fravel/status/1555181655136112641The “nuclear” DF-15 assessments, as best I know, trace their origins to a 1993 CIA assessment that suggested there could be a nuclear warhead for the system. More recent US intelligence assessments (including NASIC 2021) describe DF-15/CSS-6 as “conventionally-armed.”