Ambedkar writings analysis Part - 2

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar hailed as a crusader for the oppressed, held shockingly regressive views about women. He believed women in politics had “loose morals,” that their place was at home, and their duty was to cook, not lead.

This thread exposes the deeply misogynistic and patriarchal side of a man often glorified as a champion of equality.

(For reference see -Letter dated: 15-10-1956, addressed to Mayor of Nagpur Municipal Corporation) (1/n):

Amebdkar writes: "At present, the number of women in Congress politics is increasing. But it is not clear what this Congress-style women’s politics actually means. Women are abandoning their own duties to enter politics; to me, this is deeply shameful."

Instead of celebrating it, Ambedkar calls it “deeply shameful” and mocks women for stepping into public life.

This reveals his internalized patriarchal anxieties about women in power.

Only individuals who marry under the Hindu Marriage Act, or whose parents were married under the Hindu Marriage Act, should be eligible for caste-based rights, reservations, and related government benefits.

This will not only solve the problem of conversion but protect Bharatiya Civilisation from vested interests.

Here's a thread explaining the reasons behind the above mentioned things: (1/n):

Post-Independence “Buddhism” in India

Most post-1956 converts are Neo-Buddhists, followers of Ambedkar’s 22 vows and not traditional Buddhism. These vows not only reject Hinduism but also have little connection to Buddhist Dhamma or philosophy.

He didn’t know Sanskrit, yet somehow earned a PhD in Vedic outrage. Ambedkar was proving that you can critique an entire civilization without reading its original texts.

Here’s a thread exposing the colonial and Christian roots of Ambedkar’s “Hindu criticism” :

(0/n)

Dr. Ambedkar’s entire understanding of Hinduism and Buddhism came not from authentic Sanskrit and Pali sources, but from colonial translators and Christian missionaries.

Hence, almost his entire understanding and criticism of Hindu religion falls flat on it's face. His ideology is just a product of British - Christian colonialism. Presently, Missionaries along with the Leftists are using Ambedkarism as a tool to divide the Hindu society and destroy Bharatiya Civilisation. (1/n):

Sources of Ambedkar’s textual knowledge.

Ambedkar almost never worked directly from Sanskrit or Pali manuscripts. In his own prefaces he thanks or cites:

•G. Bühler’s The Laws of Manu (Oxford, 1886)
•Max Müller’s Sacred Books of the East series
•T. W. Rhys Davids and other members of the Pāli Text Society
•Monier-Williams, P. V. Kane, and Colebrooke

These Indologists were trained in the British Orientalist tradition; their editions were produced to serve colonial legal and missionary purposes.