After six months of genocide, this is the best the @nytimes editorial board can do—a tepid call for the US to follow its own laws.

In an attempt to save face, this cynical piece scapegoats Netanyahu and portrays Biden as a weary peacemaker. Analysis in 🧵: Netanyahu and his right-wing hardliners are a predictable product of zionism, not a distortion of its principles.

But it is more convenient for The Times to blame Netanyahu for Israel’s politically toxic war—rather than levy a critique which might indict zionism itself.

Today marks six months of war in Gaza.

We’ve compiled a thread detailing half a year of The New York Times’ complicity in Israel’s genocidal assault. Share widely!

🧵🧵🧵 Through rigorous data aggregation, we found consistent patterns of bias in topic focus, sourcing and language:

https://twitter.com/nywarcrimes/status/1771923707331547630

13 years ago, NATO militarily intervened in Libya. In the weeks before intervention, The NYT assisted in creating a pretext for intervention by propagating lies and erasing critical context. Read our history of their blood-stained coverage here, and in🧵: newyorkwarcrimes.com/libya-2011
From the outset, The Times invoked the specter of Srebrenica and Rwanda to depict Gaddafi as hell-bent on massacring the Libyan people. While Gaddafi did crack down violently on initial protests, there was no evidence of any planned, systemic violence against civilians.

This morning, Israel assaulted Al-Shifa Hospital (again) with gunfire, quadcopters and artillery, reportedly killing and wounding dozens of Palestinian civilians.

The NYT’s reporting predictably sanitizes this Israeli war crime. 🧵 The headline itself does not indicate that Israel has begun attacking the hospital — a war crime — and that they have already killed and injured many Palestinians.