I have asked this on here before and suddenly all those "Rashford" types have no answers.
Why should a taxpayer fund meals for children that are not their own, when the parents of those children already receive taxpayer funding via Child Benefit and Universal Credit etc.?
For .. what other purpose are those parents using the money intended for the upkeep of their children?
Would those clamouring for this funding to be given, support taking all of those children into care? After all, their parents are supposedly saying that they can't cope.
From where