Correction on my latest tweet wrt GrapheneOS. My wording saying it is proprietary software is *WRONG*. Sorry for the clickbait tweet, I'm not used to so many watchers. BUT, from what I'm seeing it's barely opensource either. \ They don't want other people (see github.com/GrapheneOS/os-… and absence of answer until shitstorm), they demand their code removed ( github.com/AOSPAlliance/a… ), that means they do opensource... until they don't, \

Treble has been around for now 4 years, we can now draw conclusions about the idea, its architecture and how Google follows it up. The architecture pretty much stands strongly. Props to the people who planned it, I was impressed then, and still am. 1/26 I'll only discuss about the Google/AOSP-related stuff. There has been a huge lot of stuff going on related to how OEM/SoC vendors make things complicated (and unlike what many people would believe, Qualcomm is a big offender, while Mediatek is quite okay). 2/26