A bunch of apps promise to detect ChatGPT. That's great! But before you go uploading student assignments to them, here are a few questions to ask yourself... 1: Do I have the students' permission to upload it? Historically, some students have objected to the use of text-matching tools, and some have even taken legal action against them. It's likely some students will object to ChatGPT 'detectors'

For years I've been trying to get any proctoring company to agree to a study where I try to cheat. None have agreed. I've had legal advice not to do such a study without permission from the vendors.
I'm delighted to share that someone else has done one: ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles… "The most important findings were that none of the cheating students were flagged by Proctorio, whereas only one (out of 6) was caught out by an independent check by a human agent. The sensitivity of Proctorio, based on this experience, should therefore be put at very close to 0"

Can someone, in a single tweet, please define what #ungrading is? Even better if you can state how it’s different to assessment for learning. Huge thanks to everyone who replied here. A helpful and diverse set of responses. The big takeaway for me is that ungrading is as much about the 'why' (the rationale for ungrading) as the 'what' (the specific practices).