So yesterday I showed that 9/14 people who RFK fired from ACIP had direct or indirect ties to pharmaceutical money. It's only fair we run the same research task on the new panel, and, you can judge for yourself the difference. 🧵👇 1/9 Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, MD - A psychiatrist & neuroscientist, Dr. Hibbeln is a noted Omega-3 expert. His research focuses on Omega-3s & fish oil. He serves on the Advisory Council of the Seafood Nutrition Partnership ; the funding sources of this partnership would be relevant to assess potential indirect conflicts. His publications primarily cite NIH funding.

RFK recently fired the entire panel that advises the CDC about vaccines. The press dropped the ball on the reasons, so I asked Gemini to investigate their conflicts of interest. It actually did a remarkably good job - would you like to see what it found? 👇🧵 First up, Dr. Yvonne Maldonado (Stanford). A leading pediatric vaccine expert.

COI: Acted as site Principal Investigator (PI) for Pfizer's COVID-19 & RSV vaccine trials.
Also a site PI for an AstraZeneca vaccine trial.
Previously served on a Pfizer data safety monitoring board.

Pfizer's stock is getting absolutely hammered, and I'll summarise one explanation as to why.

Pfizer gave your regulator data on their mRNA product in the hope to get it to market. The data impressed your regulator, and in a slight panic, your regulator approved it

However...🧵 The data Pfizer gave was only relevant to their 'Process 1' mRNA product. Their 'concept car' basically.

The mRNA product finally shipped to your health service and injected into arms was made in a very different way, it was called 'Process 2' or the 'commercial process'

I spent an hour or two digging around on this. It seems to me that Jordon Walker in the very least worked for Boston Consulting Group, as per his recruitment site pages.

Quick thread to store this information long term:

https://twitter.com/Doctor_I_am_The/status/1618428509340454913

Here is the 'Apollo' recruitment page archived on Google Cache:
webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache…

I also archived it here:
archive.is/Kqu4e

The page has now been deleted, but it *did* say he worked at Boston Consulting Group, but what if this apollo recruitment is just made up?

A story.

In 2020, a facebook user spotted something, which I've had to censor for the twitter filter: "Hydroxychloroquine is ch3ap-91% 3ff3ctive." the user said.

"Remdesivir is $1000-under 50% effective. Why is Fauci pushing Remdesivir? It was invented by Fauci and Gates. It’s stock is now soaring. Always follow the $$$"

It's clumsy language...but

Article from 2006 which is so reminiscent of today. Parts of society - rightly - start to figure they are being played by the industry during a potential pandemic. The Guardian dutifully uses its platform to warn them against seeking alternatives
1/5
theguardian.com/society/2006/f… 2/5 "Tamiflu and Relenza, the antiviral drugs that are the best hope against bird flu" the Guardian told its readers in an article kicked off by a scientist briefing at the 'Science Media Centre'.

For the past 2 years, twitter has been censored.

Making "claims contrary to health authorities" is against the rules.

Twitter "primarily enforce this policy in close coordination with trusted partners, including public health authorities".

A🧵on how this worked against you... Doctors and researchers with a different perspective to the WHO were silenced, a policy enforced 'in close coordination' with WHO

Alex Bereson, Covid19Crusher, Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Mary Beth Pfeiffer, Tess Lawrie and many more.

Were you aware of the scale of censorship?

A $40 million grant may have given Unitaid the right to 'have a say' in the conclusions of scientific research on Ivermectin. Whether you agree with the data supporting Ivermectin or not, a lobby altering key research conclusions is not OK. Here's what we know 🧵 Dr Andrew Hill of the University of Liverpool was a huge advocate for Iver before January 2021. He admitted 'a very powerful lobby' had a say in the conclusions of his 'very unusual' paper, which showed a 75% reduction in mortality in COVID patients

philharper.substack.com/p/the-very-unu…