ringwiss Profile picture
🏳️‍🌈 🇪🇺 🇵🇱 🇬🇧 He/him. Armchair parliamentarian. I type at 140 wpm. RTs are endorsements.
Feb 27 19 tweets 6 min read
Not being a lawyer, I will focus on those aspects of this opinion that deal with parliamentary procedure.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
I'll get the pedantry out of the way first.

1. Why would you count 'not voting' as a vote?

2. To claim that the proper denominator is 435, even if there are vacancies, is simply wrong. This is not a discharge petition. There were 431 members at the time, so a quorum was 216. Image
Feb 14 16 tweets 5 min read
The previous question "is an ingenious method [...] but its technical name does little to elucidate its operation", so here's a 🧵 to consolidate everything there is to know about defeating the PQ.

TL;DR: This is the best method by which a majority can bring up the supplemental. First, a very general explanation:

1. In the modern House of Representatives, the previous question is the motion used to bring the House to a vote on something without further debate and amendment. Image