I’d like to share below a few thoughts on meta-/normative-ethics and how its challenges might be similar to some well known problems of computer programming languages and — consequently — how similar solutions might perhaps be applied: (0/12) (1/12) Lots of clashes in society seem to be caused by *implicit* assumption that other persons should subscribe to the same ethical system as we do (and more generally to the same axiological systems).

IMHO there are “only” two skills required in infosec: 1. curiosity about tech, and 2. tendency to spot holes in reasoning. Different people mix these two in various ratios. If #1 is stronger with you, you might feel more “outdated” after a longer break.

https://twitter.com/jeremiahg/status/1111751817736536064

... and if you more of a “hole poker” type, be especially wary not to abuse this tendency in relations outside work. Won’t make you happy long term wise. #IMHO

Only a few more and it'll be just like on Qubes ;)
- USBGuard
- NetStackGuard
- GUIGuard (aka win32k)
- ClipboardGuard
- KernelGuard

https://twitter.com/aionescu/status/865955829177925632

But to be fair: only Qubes 4.1 (i.e. when we introduce full GUI domain) will be protected against DMA from malicious GPU devices.