Debunk the Kang of Jats on Chachnama to prove Samma, Lakhas as Jats

A Thread....🧵 Jats frequently cite the Chachnama to claim that Lakhas, Sammas, and Lohanas were “Jat people,” but this is a fundamental misreading of the text.

Let's examine the mindset and philosophy reflected in the arguments of an ignorant, irrelevant, poorly informed, and jealousy-driven individual, as exemplified through this person.

A Thread..🧵

https://twitter.com/thehistoropill/status/2007185650647552079

Here, he is unable to even read his own cited snippet. His excerpt falsely claims that the Gunda Inscription identifies the Abhiras as Sakas, whereas the inscription clearly does the opposite—it explicitly differentiates between Abhiras and Sakas.

https://x.com/i/status/2007187343304995085

Yadu In Rigveda

A Thread 🧵.. Not all mandalas of the Ṛgveda are considered to belong to the same period. According to historians, different mandalas of the Ṛgveda were composed at different times. Scholars who have closely studied the Ṛgveda—such as Talageri—regard Mandalas 6, 3, and 7 as the earliest.

Jārtika ≠ Jārta ≠ Jat
exposing the linguistic loophole and highlights the evasive strategy employed when Jats are confronted with evidence, A Thread 🧵

https://twitter.com/swarnprastha_/status/1807343306642174207

Here, Jats cherry-pick Hemachandra’s usage of the term Jārta; however, grammatically, a tribal name cannot take singular or plural forms, as it denotes a collective group rather than an individual.