Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Sam Haselby Profile picture
Sam Haselby
@samhaselby
Historian, wrote Origins of American Religious Nationalism; Eagle Scout, Wisconsinite
Jul 28, 2024 • 8 tweets • 2 min read
Here's a short media literacy🧵for scholars and other people who haven't worked in the field (especially TV) to help you understand what historians they are doing on TV news. They are not chosen for scholarly reasons. Even in print media, the difference between being an editor.. ...at a scholarly journal and a magazine is in the former you are representing the interests of the discipline in the latter you are representing the interests of readers. TV news is a more peculiar market: small, super competitive, highly lucrative. It's this way because its...
Jul 21, 2024 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Jim is expressing one of the oldest chestnuts of American exceptionalism: 'Europe has bad ethnic nationalisms but the US has salubrious civic ideals or patriotism.' It's not true. First, Jefferson and Andrew Jackson and then many New England intellectuals could not have... ...been any clearer in expressing white nationalism. Jefferson wrote about how putative physical differences of people of African descent made them incapable of the duties citizenship. That's white nationalism. Andrew Jackson was as explicit in his addresses to Congress on...
Jul 5, 2024 • 8 tweets • 3 min read
By request, a short 🧵on why among hundreds of learned and capable historians of America, Chris Hayes would turn to Thomas Zimmer, who has never published any scholarship in English, and Kevin Kruse, who got caught plagiarizing. This may help media people who think this...
Image
Image ...is solid history or historians who are wondering about the principle of selection at work. First, doing TV is hard. It is very different from how historians learn in scholarly communities to think and talk. You have to speak quickly, make your point economically in active...
Nov 29, 2023 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Rachel Maddow is paid $30 million a year is because she is skilled and effective at her job. Her job is helping convince American liberals that foreign tyrants or totally marginal losers like Idaho Nazis are a huge, dangerous threat. This is propaganda for the 1% and... ..if historians at the schools for the 1% want to join this project, that is what, thinking historically, we'd expect of their social role. The rest of us should however not believe that "engaging with the public" or "broad publics" are kinds of magic...
Aug 14, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
In the end, all the utilitarian arguments for saving or preserving the study of languages and philosophy and history and literature in colleges are concessions to neoliberal premises and fail. People simply have to find studying them fun and important in deep ways. No one wants to hear lectures on the potential market value of studying history or Persian poetry. It's mostly bullshit anyway. One thing that is not going to be good though is these things disappearing from West Virginia University while getting ever richer at the Stanfords.
Jun 23, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
A coterie of liberal elites remains committed to maintaining that poor and working class voters are not moved by material interests but motivated by atavistic resentments and primordial cultural patterns. They make this argument mostly through...
democracyjournal.org/arguments/the-… ...awkward rhetorical assertions: "Delivering for people on economic issues is an important goal in itself, but it is not an antivenom for the snakebite of authoritarianism." Snakebites. Antivenom. How do they explain risiing mortality rates? Well it is poor white peoples'...
May 18, 2023 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
Fox News is the fake problem most beloved by our neoliberal elites. Fox has lost 1/3 of its audience since 2020 (now down to 2 million viewers, fewer people than Queens or Houston) and will be replaced by the even worse Newsmax or Breitbart or something else. Media-brain addled neoliberals who don't want to change anything real have convinced each other Fox controls the world. But Fox didn't want McCain in '08, Romney in '12, or Trump in '16. They couldn't even get the Republican presidential candidate they want.
May 15, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
The paradox pioneered by our elite neoliberal institutions: standpoint diversity, viewpoint orthodoxy. People are blaming the consultants but (I admit I am biased because I know, like, and respect several people who do this professionally) their view is they are hired to provide cover for what institutions already want to do. Image
Apr 4, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
If you want to understand why "racial capitalism" is being theorized at Harvard and Stanford and the schools for the 1%: 60% of their undergrads go into finance, consulting, or tech. They want to look anywhere except to class and economic inequality to explain our political ills. People who think racial capitalism is a radical or left wing theory might ask why the NYT, Disney, Hulu, the Carlyle Group are publicizing it (in form of 1619 Project), and why pharma, finance, and Silicon Valley are giving Kendi millions of $ to promote it.
Feb 16, 2023 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Prestige legacy media often more interested in what Fox says about events than the events themselves. Liberal media depends on Fox. They report not only on things which appear on Fox News but things that Fox employees allegedly said in private and in this way contribute to everyone becoming dumber: