🧵 Get. This. Deceit.

On Wed, Matt Miller, in response to a question from me about if the State Dept recognized that the Geneva Conventions applied to the occupied Palestinian territories, proclaimed: “We of course accept the Geneva Conventions” -- I said thanks and moved on... The next day, I raised my hand the entire briefing (as I usually do) and he didn't call on me.

I went up to him after and asked why he didn’t specify occupied Palestinian territory, he said: “I said exactly what I meant”.

NEW: State Dept says they wouldn't “support” the UN General Assembly suspending Israel under the “Uniting for Peace” resolution, but fails to answer my question about what they'd DO if it’s invoked 🧵

Video by @decensorednews: The point I tried to make amid the crosstalk is that Israel is still bombing Gaza depite the UNSC Resolution and ICJ Order.

That's why Uniting for Peace is needed. Obviously he cut off my follow-up completely.

More coming soon via husseini.org

#InvokeGenocideConvention

My latest --

To Save Gaza, Invoke the Genocide Convention

The ICC is a "puppet institution". What's needed is a country to invoke the Genocide Convention at the International Court of Justice. Here's how, with argument, phone numbers, addresses and emails.

Some of the greatest successes in recent human history have combined protest movements with strong diplomatic moves.

In February 1998, the Clinton administration seemed poised to inflict a massive attack on Iraq, but vocal opposition from the US public, especially at a CNN town hall meeting in Ohio, combined by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan going to Iraq, repelled the US government attack.

The following year, in the Battle of Seattle, combined protests in the streets and delegations from the global south finding their backbone resulted in the World Trade Organization’s plans collapsing. This was a major setback for global corporate interests.

There is now effectively a global movement, largely based around mass protests, to stop Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza.

Several countries, including South Africa, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Comoros, Djibouti as well as Colombia and Algeria and Turkey have moved for the International Criminal Court to prosecute Israeli officials.

The problem is that ICC has been dragging its heels for years on prosecuting Israelis. It has been called a “white man’s court” after only going after Africans, and, after letting Israel off the hook during an earlier assault on Gaza, “a hoax”. Some of these nations have called Israel’s war crimes “genocide”. They should act on their words and invoke the relevant treaty. Other nations that have been especially critical of Israel are Pakistan, Brazil, Chile, Belize, Jordan, Chad, Honduras, Bahrain, Venezuela, Iran, and Cuba.

The International Court of Justice, also called the World Court, in contrast has ruled against Israel. But so far these rulings have been advisory opinions. It ruled against Israel in a case regarding its wall in 2004. In another case before it, is expected to rule against Israel’s long term policies.

But what can be done now, Prof. Francis Boyle, who successfully represented the Bosnians before the World Court, argues is to use emergency processes to give more teeth to the World Court. This can be done by invoking the Genocide Convention. This is outlined by Boyle, noted by UN whistleblower Craig Mokhiber, backed by Nobel Peace Prize winner Mairead Maguire, and written about by myself. And most recently by Craig Murray, now a human rights activist who was the British ambassador to Uzbekistan and Rector of the University of Dundee.

Murray just wrote the piece “Activating the Genocide Convention” which states: “There are 149 states party to the Genocide Convention. Every one of them has the right to call out the genocide in progress in Gaza and report it to the United Nations. In the event that another state party disputes the claim of genocide — and Israel, the United States and the United Kingdom are all states party — then the International Court of Justice [also called the World Court] is required to adjudicate on ‘the responsibility of a State for genocide.'”

Murray quotes from the Genocide Convention and cites evidence that Israel is conducting genocide and that the US and British governments are at minimum complicit in that. He then states: “The International Court of Justice is the most respected of international institutions; while the United States has repudiated its compulsory jurisdiction, the United Kingdom has not and the EU positively accepts it.

“If the International Court of Justice makes a determination of genocide, then the International Criminal Court does not have to determine that genocide has happened. This is important because unlike the august and independent ICJ, the ICC is very much a western government puppet institution which will wiggle out of action if it can. But a determination of the ICJ of genocide and of complicity in genocide would reduce the ICC’s task to determining which individuals bear the responsibility. That is a prospect which can indeed alter the calculations of politicians.

“It is also the fact that a reference for genocide would force the western media to address the issue and use the term, rather than just pump out propaganda about Hamas fighting bases in hospitals. …

“I am afraid the question of why Palestine has not invoked the Genocide Convention takes us somewhere very dark. … It is Fatah who occupy the Palestinian seat at the United Nations, and the decision for Palestine to call into play the Genocide Convention lies with Mahmoud Abbas. It is more and more difficult daily to support Abbas. He seems extraordinarily passive, and the suspicion that he is more concerned with refighting the Palestinian civil war than with resisting the genocide is impossible to shake. By invoking the Genocide Convention he could put himself and Fatah back at the centre of the narrative. But he does nothing. I do not want to believe that corruption and a Blinken promise of inheriting Gaza are Mahmoud’s motivators. But at the moment, I cannot grab on to any other explanation to believe in.”

Thus speeches from Abbas and allied Palestinians figures should be viewed extremely skeptically. It is also very odd, to say the very least, that Francesca Albanese , Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, and other officials put out a statement “Gaza: UN experts call on international community to prevent genocide against the Palestinian people” — but make no mention whatever of the Genocide Convention.

As Murray writes: “Any one of the 139 states party could invoke the Genocide Convention against Israel and its co-conspirators. Those states include Iran, Russia, Libya, Malaysia, Bolivia, Venezuela, Brazil, Afghanistan, Cuba, Ireland, Iceland, Jordan, South Africa, Turkey and Qatar. But not one of these states has called out the genocide [by invoking the Convention]. Why?

“It is not because the Genocide Convention is a dead letter. It is not. It was invoked against Serbia by Bosnia and Herzegovina and the ICJ ruled against Serbia with regard to the massacre at Srebrenica.” Murray notes that this helped lead to prosecutions.

He adds: “Some states may simply not have thought of it. For Arab states in particular, the fact that Palestine itself has not invoked the Genocide Convention may provide an excuse. EU states can hide behind bloc unanimity.

“But I am afraid that the truth is that no state cares sufficiently about the thousands of Palestinian children already killed and thousands more who will shortly be killed, to introduce another factor of hostility in their relationship with the United States. Just as at [the recent] summit in Saudi Arabia, where Islamic countries could not agree [on] an oil and gas boycott of Israel, the truth is that those in power really do not care about a genocide in Gaza. They care about their own interests.

“It just needs one state to invoke the Genocide Convention and change the narrative and the international dynamic. That will only happen through the power of the people in pressing the idea on their governments. This is where everybody can do a little something to add to the pressure. Please do what you can.”

What can you do? Urge countries which have been critical of Israel to invoke the Genocide Convention at the International Court of Justice. Get groups and influential people to make this a primary ask.

Protests in NYC should include visits and vigils to the missions of those countries. Activists who have been arrested for protesting against Israel’s slaughter can ask UN officials from countries critical of Israel to invoke the Genocide Convention.

Palestinians in Ramallah may be able to directly contact the representatives of various countries to Palestine.

This can be done anywhere. Protests in London can respectfully appeal to the embassies of various countries critical of Israel.

We need to keep pressing directly against the US and Israeli governments, but their hearts are like stone. If we reach other states to invoke the Genocide Convention, it may be a key stop in curtailing the slaughter.

Moreover, it could be a turning point in global relations. Should a positive emergency ruling by the International Court of Justice be forthcoming, it would dramatically isolate the US and Israel at the UN. The US would of course try to block anything at the UN Security Council. But with a World Court ruling, Boyle argues, the stage would be set for the General Assembly to assert itself using the Uniting for Peace procedure. Combined with sustained protests, like the WTO and other critical confrontations, the costs of continuing the slaughter could become unsustainable. Moreover, a World Court ruling could facilitate other legal efforts, like universal jurisdiction.

For all that to happen, a country needs to step forward and invoke the Genocide Convention.

Make no mistake; any nation that does this may well be targeted in insidious ways by the US and by Israel. Any such nation should be afforded every bit of support people of goodwill can muster.

Here's a website that seems to list all the embassies and other diplomatic missions around the world. People from anywhere can be emailing, calling and going to these embassies and missions, urging these countries to use every legal mechanism to pressure Israel to stop, including invoking the Genocide Convention: .

A friend extracted emails of missions to the UN:

info@afghanistan-un.org
mission.newyork@mfa.gov.al
officeofthepr.albania@mfa.gov.al
algeriamission.ny@gmail.com
contact@andorraun.org

....embassy-worldwide.com Accounts of relevant officials to contact encouraging them to #InvokeGenocideConvention

@AzizAkhannouch
@AmbHHajoui

@AUC_MoussaFaki
@anwaribrahim
@MMuizzu
@jonasgahrstore
@AHuitfeldt
@SultanHaithamT1
@TamimBinHamad
@JalilJilani
@ArifAlvi
@LulaOficial
@CyrilRamaphosa
@LuchoXBolivia
@KingAbdullahII
@GabrielBoric
@petrogustavo
@JohnBricenoBZE
@RTErdogan
@GmahamatIdi
@XiomaraCastroZ
@khalidbinhamad
@TebbouneAmadjid
@NicolasMaduro
@khamenei_ir
@DiazCanelB
@sanchezcastejon
@PresidentIRL
@LeoVaradkar
@ClareDalyMEP

@jokowi
@Azali_officiel
@IsmailOguelleh
@PresidentISL
@LPCLYM

Thread:

The best avenue to stop Israel's assault may be to invoke the Genocide Convention.

Several heads of State have charged that Israel is committing genocide including Lula of Brazil:
middleeastmonitor.com/20231027-brazi… Such countries -- including South Africa, Bolivia, Chile, Venezuela, various Arabic and Muslim countries, and certainly any country which has charged "genocide" should invoke the Genocide Convention.

Thread! -- from my latest -->>

Should Hamas Release Its Captives?

In 1990, Saddam Hussein listened to those advising he release captives he had. He did so. Within a few weeks, the disaster really began for Iraq. In December 1990, Saddam Hussein released Western captives he had. Leftist scholar Eqbal Ahmad would comment at a teach-in that I attended shortly thereafter as I recall that it was an act of “ridiculous generosity”.

It simply enabled the US to bomb Iraq the following month...

After not a word of criticism of Israel was uttered at the State Dept briefing for the first 15 minutes, I spoke up.

In the course of the event I asked a series of questions including:

“Does Israel have a right to kill civilians, Matt?”

"Will You Urge Israel to Not Starve and Slaughter People?"

He never called on me, but, after I first spoke up, Miller finally did call on @SMArikat who raised issue of Israeli war crimes.

Then @StateDeptSpox called on @MaxBlumenthal who asked a series of strong questions and I followed up:

“So baby killing is ok here?”

WATCH:

https://twitter.com/decensorednews/status/1711923194133708990

George W. Bush, 2003:
"The United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people."

Matt Miller, @StateDeptSpox 2023:
"We do not have any quarrel with the Palestinian people."

BREAKING - State Dept refuses to address how much USAID money went to Wuhan Institute of Virology and collaborator Ralph Baric, who developed techniques for weaponizing viruses (h/t @decensorednews)... @decensorednews My exchange with State Dept spokesperson Matt Miller today comes just days after The BMJ reported that the funding for such viral collection work was just cut off by USAID.
bmj.com/content/382/bm…

My latest --

Covid Origins: Progress or Orchestrated Next-Stage Deceitful Narrative?

Lab origins is now increasingly accepted, so now a major goal of the establishment is to focus blame on China so US institutions are not scrutinized and dangerous lab work continues.... Michael Shellenberger, the lead writer on a story (with Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag) citing US government sources that the index cases of Covid worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology asks ... the US government would withhold info about lab origins of Covid.

🧵 - #Nakba #Nakba75
75 Years of Israel and Zionism's Continuing Ethnic Cleansing of Palestinians
Zionist forces drove out hundreds of thousands of Palestinians 75 years ago to create their state. Here's my father's story. This piece of mine was published by the Baltimore Sun on May 31, 1998 — 25 years ago. It’s about the Nakba or Catastrophe — the massacres and forced expulsions of Palestinians which enabled the creation of the modern state of Israel... My dad died in 2017.

🧵It wasn't just Bush & Cheney who lied their way into the Iraq invasion 20 years ago. Possibly the most important Dem, who had been threatening and falsifying about Iraq for years, was Biden. See clip from his war speech and my piece on his endless lies: husseini.substack.com/p/joe-biden-wo… Perhaps Biden's biggest lie was from 2007. He claimed on "Meet the Press" about Saddam Hussein's alleged WMDs: "The real mystery is, if he, if he didn't have any of them left, why didn't he say so?" Of course, Hussein repeated say exactly that, and Biden would dismiss it.

Establishment tools Lieberman and Ridge are plugging the House “Oversight” hearings on Covid origins tomorrow. That and other factors would indicate the hearings are part of an elaborate coverup.

https://twitter.com/biocommission/status/1620456156908118019

This is live. Hearing on covid origins energycommerce.house.gov/events/oversig…

At the top of his opening, chair Griffith initially frames "biosecurity" as the solution rather than potential problem. But his remarks got better.

Why are they doing this now? Are they intentionally wanting to time things with US Jan 6? Would seem to me that they would have done something in accord with their own calendar, which would have been at some point during the transition.

https://twitter.com/UrbanNathalia/status/1612150826809839619

One thing that the timing of events in Brazil would suggest is that the actual goal of the protests is not to get JB back in as president. Rather, it’s narrative control and possibly to destabilize Brazil in some way….

The #TwitterFiles is similar to the 1993 disclosures of El Mozote massacre by 60 Minutes. It happened because an arm of the establishment -- in that case the new Secretary of State Warren Christopher -- wanted it to come out. Why? Possibly partisan gain. Possibly so that the establishment could get a re-branding. The big challenges for the establishment then were to kill off the calls for a "Peace Dividend" after the end of the "Cold War" and to continue the sanctions on Iraq.

1/x -- BREAKING -- In-depth investigation with virologist Jonathan Latham of @BioSRP and myself -- “Did West Africa’s Ebola Outbreak of 2014 Have a Lab Origin?”

In 2014, some Africans charged that the Ebola outbreak was connected to US labs in Sierra Leone...

https://twitter.com/BioSRP/status/1584914301214662656

The Ebola outbreak of 2014 was a disaster for West Africa. Over 11,000 lives were lost amidst intense negative social and economic consequences. It is today commonly cited as a bona fide example of a natural zoonosis -- but the evidence doesn't hold up: husseini.substack.com/p/did-west-afr…

My latest —

How Fauci Channeled Cheney

20 Years After Dick Cheney Lied the US into Invading Iraq, His Spirit Lives on Through Covid Origins Disinformation

husseini.substack.com/p/how-fauci-ch… On Sunday, Sept. 8, 2002, the New York Times ran on its front page the story "U.S. Says Hussein Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts" by Michael Gordon and Judith Miller. nytimes.com/2002/09/08/wor…

It’s just not logical to presume lab escape means accidental. It’s probable but not necessary. Best to remove ref to “accidental” and just say lab release.

https://twitter.com/gdemaneuf/status/1390881134628589572

If it’s intentional lab release, one of the mostly likely possibilities is that someone was trying to frame the Chinese labs. This is actually what happened with the 2001 anthrax attacks which were a false flag attack designed to look like they were from Arabs or Muslims....

Not seeing much coverage of the ten year anniversary of the Arab uprisings. They helped spawn OWS as well. The reason they and other movements lost their way is largely because they didn't have an indep media base. Al Jazeera and other Gulf media were essentially able... ...to steer the uprisings to suit their interests. This is largely why there were sustained uprisings in secular Arab states (that were militarized esp in Libya and Syria) and not in Saudi, Jordan, et al. ...

Barr is Cheney 2.0. He is CIA from way back. His father was OSS. His father hired Jeffrey Epstein to be a math teacher at the Dalton School. Barr was AG when Bush I gave Christmas eve pardons to Elliott Abrams and others after Bush I was voted out of office in 1992.... Barr was brought into the Trump administration about the same time as Elliott Abrams. He basically declared that based on his reading of the Mueller report that there was no obstruction of justice. So Barr basically got to decide if Trump stays or goes.

Adam Schiff immediately asserts virtually unlimited time for himself and makes it about demonizing Russia, the actual purpose of this process for Schiff. #ImpeachmentHearnings Adam Schiff immediately frames Biden as Trump alternative.

Yes, US gov as global mafia: "Shame what happened to your nice tanker, Mr. Abe, would be terrible if that sort of thing kept happening." Reminds me of US bombing Chinese embassy in Belgrade on May 7, 1999, shortly after China questioned the ongoing US war on Yugoslavia.

https://twitter.com/tparsi/status/1139147102225936384

AFP from April 15, 1999: "China slams NATO strikes on Yugoslavia, calls for end of action": "We express our great concern over the humanitarian catastrophe unleashed by the NATO bombs," foreign ministry spokesman Sun Yuxi said.

The OPCW yesterday announced it was about to enter Syria. US media spent today not covering this critical fact. I put it atop news release today. As much as anything else — as with the US attacks on Iraq — the targets are law, inspections, open process. accuracy.org/release/inspec…

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @opcw view original on Twitter

I was alerted to this by Noam Chomsky who really deserves the credit here. He was totally spot on. I don’t think he would mind if I shared his note from yesterday afternoon to me: