Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Secrets and Laws Profile picture
Secrets and Laws
@secretsandlaws
Former CIA attorney, addressing all things relating to national security, secrecy, classification, FOIA, climate change, and bird law.
25 subscribers
Oct 9 • 5 tweets • 1 min read
It took a while, but I finally got the For You tab to look less like Stormfront & more like a regular feed. I spent two days clicking "Not Interested in this post" on over 100 right-wing accounts that Elon kept resurfacing. After an epic battle, I finally defeated the algorithm. It really was a battle. As you've experienced, prior to doing this I usually saw some combination of Elon, Vivek, Vance, CatTurd, or some other freak of the week in three of the first four posts, and then it the feed became more mixed between incel & regular content after that.
Sep 9 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Kudos to @jdawsey1 and @AshleyRParker for finally covering the fact that Trump has been devoting time to lining his own pockets through another grifting scheme, rather than raising money for his struggling campaign.

If you bitch about bad journalism, reward good journalism. Their article calls a spade a spade, and doesn't engage in silly both sides-ism. Imagine if all political coverage was like this.
Image
Image
Aug 27 • 6 tweets • 4 min read
Perfectly normal for a presidential candidate to try to line his own pockets in the home stretch of the campaign.

"CIC Digital" = a Trump-owned entity that licenses his likeness for this NFT nonsense. Trump gets a hefty license fee for every set that is sold.
Image Literally selling access -- not to raise money for his struggling campaign -- but to line his pockets. $7425 per ticket.

And if I understand correctly, they are charging more for dinner tickets if you pay with crypto, which isn't exactly a vote of confidence in the industry! Image
Aug 27 • 9 tweets • 2 min read
With Jack Smith not seeking Cannon's removal at this time, I think we can say that the MAL case is unlikely to go to trial until 2026 at the earliest, if Trump loses the election.

Cannon will be reversed by the 11th Circuit in the pending appeal. Assuming no SCOTUS review... ...she'll get the case back in late 2024/early 2025. But then immunity will be considered next, and I believe Cannon will rule in Trump's favor there too. See thread. Even then, it will be hard for Smith to seek her removal in light of the SCOTUS ruling.

Aug 25 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
Your weekly swing state climate news:

1. Arizona, yesterday:

2. Arizona, two days ago:

Jul 15 • 13 tweets • 4 min read
The MAL case was never going to a jury with Cannon, so other than the political gift of the timing, today's development merely accelerates the process of DOJ figuring out next steps. However, there are no "good" options for Smith. The question is which is the least worst. I'd start from the premise that Smith appealing and NOT asking for her removal may be the worst option. She's proven that she'll do everything she can to tank the case for Trump. But asking for her removal is a pretty dramatic step, one that DOJ will not take lightly.
Jul 14 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Just as you shouldn't spread false information, please avoid rushing to judgment until all the facts come out.

For example, lots of people are criticizing the two snipers in the video for not firing earlier. As this shows, it's POSSIBLE that their view was obstructed by a tree. There was absolutely an F-up here, don't get me wrong. But trying to ascribe individual blame without all the facts is inappropriate. These are public servants putting their lives on the line for the protectee. Let's just let the facts come out before throwing them under the bus.
Jul 2 • 11 tweets • 2 min read
As others have noted, the SC's immunity decision may also imperil the classified documents prosecution against Trump. Emboldened by the ruling, he will continue to argue that his designation of certain records as “personal” under the PRA was an official act subject to immunity. It would be a stretch to say this act relates to a core function, but who knows with Cannon? Instead it likely falls into the middle category of non-core official acts that are presumptively immune from prosecution. Of course, Cannon has shown favor toward the PRA argument…
Jun 26 • 10 tweets • 3 min read
This Jim Jordan report on the letter from the former intel officers is one of the dumber things I’ve ever read. It doesn’t appear to even have a good theory about what the CIA did wrong, but it assumes that randomly quoting some internal emails will give Fox News what it needs. First, it suggests that the CIA should have stopped the letter even though it didn’t contain classified information. This would violate the 1st Amend rights of these individuals. If it doesn’t contain classified information, the CIA cannot stop its publication. See Constitution.
Jun 23 • 18 tweets • 4 min read
One of the most frustrating aspects of the Biden campaign to date has been its failure to make climate change a leading campaign issue. The climate crisis no longer theoretical; it’s here. And his opponent is a climate change denier. Failing to rectify this would be unforgivable. Putting climate near the top of the agenda is first and foremost the moral thing to do; we owe it to our children and future generations. But let’s put that aside and just focus on the politics. While I don’t agree, I understand Democratic reluctance in the past to making…
Jun 22 • 7 tweets • 2 min read
One of the most infuriating and under-the-radar things Judge Cannon has done recently is postponing the hearing on Trump's motion to compel discovery that was supposed to be held this upcoming week. Trump filed this motion in January, and she still hasn't ruled on it! From a timing perspective, this is the most important issue pending before the court. If Cannon orders additional discovery, DOJ will have to search for responsive records from other agencies, and if any are classified, go through the CIPA process again - which could take months.
May 28 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
A few reactions to Trump's filing:

1. On the merits, this points out the big issue with Smith's motion, which is the lack of a supporting declaration & evidence about threats to law enforcement. That seems imperative here, esp. given how Cannon has reacted in the past. IMO, Smith's team should have taken the time to provide that declaration, even if it meant waiting until Monday. Maybe we'll see it in a reply brief.

2. The lack of meaningful meet and confer is a red herring here. The point is to try to narrow disputes before the court.
May 27 • 10 tweets • 2 min read
Since the "Smith should have just brought the documents case in DC" chorus is picking up again, it's time for a reminder as to why that's not true. Please read before continuing to propagate this false premise. Smith is bound by the Constitution, federal law, and case law -- which collectively requires that, at minimum, a "conduct element" of the offense be committed in the district where it's charged. Let's look at the offenses.
May 18 • 9 tweets • 3 min read
Judge Cannon's failures in the MAL case have been obvious to all, but when you step back and look at the bigger picture, her record is even more indefensible. As I outline in today's NYT, in over 11 months she's made virtually no progress in the case.

nytimes.com/2024/05/18/opi… It's important to remember the fundamental purpose of pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case, as I outline here. Image
Apr 10 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
If Cannon was going to grant Trump's motions to compel classified discovery, or to include the IC in the scope of the prosecution team, it wouldn't make sense for her to schedule Trump's Sec. 5 notice for less than a month from now. So perhaps a good sign for DOJ, but who knows? Granting the motions would mean DOJ would have to search for add'l records, review them, & work with agencies on CIPA protections. That would take well more than a month. Trump's team would want to see these records before issuing its Sec. 5 notice (info it wants to use at trial)
Apr 4 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Look, even if Cannon did the right thing on the PRA, she could still:
-Grant the presidential immunity MTD
-Grant the selective & vindictive prosecution MTD (or permit discovery into the same)
-Issue quite a few detrimental CIPA rulings
-Suppress the search warrant returns -Suppress the attorney-client privileged material (critical for obstruction)
-Run a bad voir dire process
-Adopt whacky jury instructions on other issues
-Issue a whole host of bad evidentiary rulings at trial
-Oh, and disclose witness identifying information prior to trial.
Apr 3 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
I am here for the Jack Smith sass.
Image More sass: Image
Mar 24 • 11 tweets • 3 min read
Here's the argument as to why Cannon's potential removal is not ripe at this time:

1. She won't recuse herself if DOJ moves for it, & the district chief judge won't either. It would only come from the 11th Circuit via reassignment on remand after a successful DOJ appeal. 2. Obviously DOJ hasn't appealed anything to date. Frankly, there's been nothing to appeal. DOJ is not going to appeal pre-trial & trial scheduling issues, as a court of appeals is EXTREMELY unlikely to second guess how a judge runs their docket. Being bad on scheduling, and...
Mar 19 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
I agree with @MuellerSheWrote and @BradMossEsq that as for the second scenario in Cannon's order, DOJ will likely argue that if this were the law, she should just dismiss those counts now as a matter of law, and then they'd appeal to the 11th Circuit. At least this avoids the scenario @JoyceWhiteVance worried about, where Cannon reserved on these issues until after the jury was impaneled, when a dismissal might be non-appealable due to double jeopardy issues. Better to find out where she's at now.

Mar 14 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Today's hearing in the MAL case will be very telling.

First, Trump's separate presidential immunity motion hinges on this PRA argument. It's the "official act" underlying the immunity assertion. If Cannon thinks it's a close call, that means a stay is likely coming. When we eventually get to Trump's presidential immunity assertion, even if Cannon denies it, she will stay the case unless she finds that the assertion is "frivolous." So today will be the early tell as to how she's leaning on this question.

Mar 5 • 6 tweets • 2 min read
My prediction:

The Biden Administration would very much like to continue these briefings, as it won't want to break from precedent & they are not that sensitive.

But it ultimately will not do so bc of the MAL prosecution, for two distinct reasons. First, giving the briefings also sets a bad precedent. How can you deny clearances to rank & file employees for minor transgressions while treating Trump as if he's cleared after he absconded with 100s of classified docs, refused to give them back, & obstructed the investigation.