Critique of The Economist’s “Somalia in Tatters” Article:

The Economist published its Somalia piece on July 24, just one day after the federal government (FGS) condemned Puntland’s seizure of a Turkish-linked ship as piracy. Yet… no mention of the incident. Why? On July 18, Puntland intercepted the MV Sea World, a vessel allegedly carrying Turkish-marked weapons. The FGS called the seizure piracy. Somali media was ablaze; but The Economist didn’t mention that.
Instead, it spotlighted Puntland’s interior minister, a staunch FGS critic.
The FGS’s stance? Missing in action.

@MPDrAbib , Full Salary, Empty Seat: The Abdillahi Hashi Standard.
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴 MP Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib now lectures government on responsibility, leadership, and billion-dollar proposals.
Bold words, from someone who hasn’t shown up to most parliamentary sessions. But his paycheck? Always on time.

A Masterclass in Legal Illusion – Responding to Sheikhnor Abucar Qassim 🧵
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴
1/7
@SheiknorQassim , Adeer Sheikhnor, your tweet is a dramatic display of political theatre wrapped in legal confusion. You wave around Chapter 7 of the UN Charter like it’s a “Game Over” card ; but either you’ve misunderstood it, or you’re hoping others have. Let’s unpack your misconceptions. 2/7

Chapter 7 status does not nullify sovereignty. Many sovereign nations have operated under Chapter 7 mandates ; Iraq, Liberia, even Haiti. It authorises measures to maintain peace and security, not to revoke statehood. Somalia is not a UN protectorate.

@SheiknorQassim , Adeer Sheiknor, your tweet is a dramatic display of political theatre wrapped in legal confusion. You toss around Chapter 7 of the UN Charter as if it’s a ‘Game Over’ card ; but it’s clear you’ve either misunderstood it or are hoping others will. Let’s unpack that
🧵 1/6
Chapter 7 status does not nullify sovereignty. Many sovereign nations have operated under Chapter 7 mandates ; Iraq, Liberia, even Haiti. It authorises measures to maintain peace and security, not to revoke statehood. Somalia is not a UN protectorate.

🧵 Thread: Why Somalia’s Unity Remains Legally Intact Under International Law 🇸🇴⚖️ 1/4
Somaliland’s 1991 independence claim lacks legal force. On 1 July 1960, British Somaliland & Italian Somaliland united to form the Somali Republic. This union was later confirmed in the 1961 national constitutional referendum, where 90% of voters approved unity. 🗳️

This is not Article 65 on MP qualifications — this is Article 65 on the Speaker and Deputy Speakers.

Here’s the key part
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴 Clause (3): “Before assuming office, the Speaker shall relinquish any official position in a political party, and shall be strictly neutral in the performance of his or her functions.”

There’s a growing myth that a Deputy Speaker must be politically neutral—even unaffiliated. Let’s unpack that using the Somali Constitution.
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴 Article 22 actually protects political rights: the right to form parties, participate in political life, and express opinions. That applies to everyone, including MPs and Deputy Speakers.

Hello CBB, Dishonest intellectuals
👇
Uganda Meeting: United Strategy for Somalia’s Security.
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴
At the Extra-Ordinary Summit, leaders agreed on urgent steps to strengthen Somalia’s security. They directed Defence Chiefs to prepare a comprehensive plan to deter, degrade, and eliminate Al-Shabaab. #Somalia #AUSSOM Leaders also called for boosting Air Assets, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, and using all resources in a fully coordinated manner for maximum effectiveness. #Somalia #Support

Why did Somalia sign with @Starlink To bridge the digital divide. Many parts of Somalia, especially rural areas, still lack reliable internet. Satellite broadband brings fast, affordable access without needing fibre or towers.

Dissecting a Dubious Letter: Why the Somalia–Trump Letter Appears Inauthentic The tone is unusually flattering, closer to political praise than formal diplomacy. It offers the U.S. exclusive control over Somali airbases and ports, an unrealistic claim without any reference to legal or procedural backing.

Mr. Accidental President Farmajo @M_Farmaajo , your statement seems like propaganda in support of the terrorist group Al-Shabaab. The IED attack yesterday was not near Villa Somalia but targeted innocent civilians. Stop spreading misleading narratives and stand with the Somali people against terror When you were president, Al-Shabaab was openly collecting taxes in Mogadishu, and the city was not safe. Now, under the current leadership, there is no more Al-Shabaab tax, and Mogadishu is more peaceful. Stop distorting the truth

Maqal majiraa, CBB, dishonest intellectuals, opportunistic job seekers, and corrupt Somali parliamentarians. Beesha Caalamka.
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴

Why was Dr. Cabdullaahi Xaashi Cabdi removed from Parliament? Let’s break it down using the Somali Constitution and parliamentary rules. 🧵👇 Legal Basis for Removal
According to Article 59(1)(a) of the Somali Provisional Constitution, an MP loses their seat if they miss two consecutive parliamentary sittings without a valid excuse.

Maqal majiraa, CBB, dishonest intellectuals, opportunistic job seekers, and corrupt Somali parliamentarians. Beesha Caalamka.
🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴

🚨 🚨

The fight against Al-Shabaab and all terrorist groups is necessary. Still, it’s also important to address misconceptions about the law and recognise the rights of families and children who are not responsible for the actions of terrorists. 🧵@threadreaderapp unroll Al-Shabaab and ISIS are non-state actors and are not recognised as legitimate governments or military forces under international law.

Should Somali MPs Be Prosecuted for Undermining the War on Al-Shabaab? 🇸🇴⚖️ Let’s examine. 🧵👇

🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴🇸🇴 🔹 Both are sitting Members of Parliament (MPs) and have a duty to uphold national security.
🔹 Their words carry significant influence, and if they weaken counterterrorism efforts, they could be held accountable.
🔹 Somali Constitution (2012):
•Article 18: Protects freedom of speech, BUT…
•Article 126: The state must protect national security & public order