DEBUNKED: A THREAD 🧵

https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1805344652528435340

DEBUNKED: Trump is a racist/White Supremacist/Neo-Nazi

https://twitter.com/therealzno/status/1804877128166490607

‼️💣 BREAKING: Hunter Biden was just indicted by a grand jury in the Central District of a California.

🧵 Full review below: ‼️ Overview of Hunter Biden Indictment:

Allegations of Financial Misconduct:

• Engaged in a scheme from January 2017 to October 15, 2020, to evade at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes for 2016-2019.

• Subverted his company’s payroll and tax withholding process.

• Spent millions on a lavish lifestyle instead of paying tax bills.

• Stopped paying outstanding taxes for 2015 in 2018.

• Willfully failed to pay taxes on time for 2016-2019 despite having funds.

• Included false business deductions in his 2018 tax returns to evade taxes​​.

🚨🧵 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP. V. MEDIA MATTERS:

Plaintiff: X Corp., a Nevada corporation operating the X social media platform (formerly Twitter).

Defendant: Media Matters for America, a DC-based media watchdog.

Additional Defendant: Eric Hananoki, a writer for Media Matters, domiciled in Maryland.
🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP. V. MEDIA MATTERS:

- Allegations Against Media Matters -

1. Misrepresentation of X Corp. Platform: Media Matters accused of maliciously portraying X Corp.’s platform as dominated by extreme content.

2. Manipulated Images: Allegedly manufactured images showing advertisers’ posts next to extremist content to mislead viewers.

3. Intention to Damage: Aimed to alienate advertisers from X Corp. and harm its business.

4. Selective Following and Manipulation: Media Matters accused of manipulating its X account to create misleading ad/content pairings.

5. Excessive Scrolling and Refreshing: Allegedly engaged in unnatural user behavior to generate desired ad/content pairings.

6. Omission in Reporting: Failed to disclose the manipulated and rare nature of the content pairings.

7. Impact on Advertisers: Many advertisers, misled by the report, withdrew their ads from X.

8. Privacy Settings Manipulation: Used privacy settings to hide its methodology from the public.

‼️⁉️ CHILD ABUSE AT COVENANT? We know of the evil event that took place on 03/27/23, when Audrey Hale slaughtered 6 individuals at The Covenant School.

Speculation regarding the shooting spans the political divide, encompassing theories of a hate crime and a panic-driven response to perceived "trans-genocide."

But a once-unvoiced theory now emerges into the discourse: the possibility of underlying child sexual abuse.

DISCLAIMER: This thread aims to illuminate the apparent concealed scandal of abuse at Covenant, providing clarity on lawsuits, records, and details involving the church, the school, and its leaders by presenting just the facts.

Following the shooting by Hale, whose actions stand out in the rarity of female-perpetrated school shootings (4 out of 147), I delved into Covenant's past.

My quick search unearthed lawsuits, documents, records, audio files and other details that, intriguingly, had not been explored in news coverage post-shooting, raising any questions about a possible link.

Covenant Presbyterian Church and School seems to have been embroiled in a convoluted child sexual abuse scandal that unfolded between 2002 and 2012, as well as a massive cover up since then.
This 2012 legal claim accuses individuals linked to Covenant - Jim Bachmann, Joe Eades, John Avery, and Worrick Robinson - of participating in the concealment of illicit child sexual abuse committed by John Perry, w/o the plaintiffs (The Davis Family) knowledge until that year.

🚨🧵 If approved by Congress, a recently introduced Senate bill by Sen. Michael Bennet would establish a federal commission responsible for monitoring Americans' speech for instances of “misinformation” and “hate speech”.

S.4201 Digital Platform Commission Act The newly proposed commission, the Federal Digital Platform Commission, would consist of five commissioners who would be appointed by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

🧵LONG FORM THREAD: The Legal Flaws in Roe and Casey's "Abortion Right" & Why SCOTUS Overturned its Federalization.
1/
Roe & Casey supporters speak of an "abortion right" that is claimed to be protected by our "liberty" of the 14th amendment.

But this "abortion right" they speak of is critally different than any other right held by the 14th amendment.

Supporters of Roe claim the abortion right is as similar to the rights recognized in past decisions involving matters to include intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage, but abortion is fundamentally different. 2/
Both Roe and Casey acknowledged this fundamental difference during their case, because it destroys the decisions that they called "fetal life" and what the law now describes as an "unborn human being".

Reading the cases of both Roe and that of Casey, their reasoning was extraordinarily weak.

Roe's treatment of the constitutional text was remarkably loose. Its argument was that the abortion right, which is not mentioned in the Constitution, is part of a "right to privacy", which is also not mentioned in the Constitution.

THE RESTRICT ACT THREAD 🧵:

1/The RESTRICT Act will have a significant impact on our freedom and rights.

First, look at the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The IEEPA is a US federal law that authorizes the president to regulate commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual or extraordinary foreign threat to national security, foreign policy, or economy. 2/The RESTRICT Act operates on a similar concept as IEEPA, where OFAC is authorized to prevent US citizens from conducting business with foreign individuals subject to sanctions.

However, the RESTRICT Act establishes a separate set of sanctions managed by the Secretary of Commerce in addition to those overseen by the Treasury Secretary through OFAC.