🧵
I don't know whether @ProfAliceS has seen this yet: if so, I have no doubt her public response will be infinitely more erudite than mine is about to be. 2/5 "Beware of calls for clarity" they conclude, and quote The Lemkin Instiutute and asserting that sex is "bi- or multi-modal" 🤦♀️
"533 geographical scholars". Well, put out the hurry-up flag if the geographers are concerned.
The authors want ethics committees more involved, when what most of us think should be happening is that "ethics committees" stop being woke and start remembering what ethics are.
May 23, 2025 • 9 tweets • 6 min read
🧵Last month I filled in the GenderGP online form (thread quoted below) as a 17 year old boy seeking 'feminisation'.
See thread below
I've just done it again, as a 15, soon to be 16, year-old girl seeking 'masculinisation'.
Results as expected 1/n
"Your Journey with GenderGP"
I filled in the form. They expect a lot of knowledge from people wanting to sign on and one is left with the clear impression that 1 Form + £195 'Set up Fee' + £65 'consultation' (which they used to call an 'information gathering exercise') gets you exactly what you want.
I filled in the form with details as if I were a boy who had just had his 17th birthday.
No checks on ID at all.
1/n2/n
Oct 28, 2024 • 7 tweets • 3 min read
.@RSPCA_official @RSPCA_PATeam
🧵 1/ The Equality & Diversity monitoring form used in your job application process says this 2/ Your list of Protected Characteristics is incorrect. 'Gender' is not a Protected Characteristic & is not defined in the Equality Act.
Mar 24, 2024 • 5 tweets • 4 min read
🧵
Dr Ronx (henceforth Dr Wrong) has posted a long diatribe on Insta. I've screenshot it all in case she decides to delete or go private.
Some astounding comments in this.
Jan 29, 2024 • 13 tweets • 3 min read
🧵 16 long months after initially submitting an FOI request to the CPS which they refused under S36, followed by the Information Commissioner’s decision that the CPS must provide the requested information, and the CPS saying they were going to appeal this decision >
but then deciding otherwise, they have finally provided the names of the “interested groups” which were consulted during the pre-consultation process on “RASSO, specifically Chapter 6: Consent, the section on Deception as to Gender.”
>
2/5
